It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Aeshma
a reply to: olaru12
You just totally discredited this entire event by insinuating sandy hook was not as it was. Im actually incredibly insulted and disgusted by your comment.
originally posted by: hartbeat
a reply to: Mandroid7
Hi ATS, haven't posted in forever, good to be here.
Anyways, in that video, around the 1:45 mark, watch, as the 2 ladies are crouched behind the vehicle, the lady on the left is smiling....continuing to smile almost laughing it seems, then gets up and just jogs off.....if i was somewhere that was being shot up last thing would be to smile or laugh. Not saying it didn't happen, just found her expression and reaction bizarre.....
originally posted by: djz3ro
...looks like crap and smells like crap, he'll it's even starting to taste like crap...
If they keep pulling stunts like this it's going to be so obviosly a false flag that the story is going to unravel before our very eyes. Maybe "they've" been creating so many false flags they're becoming complacent?
originally posted by: djz3ro
originally posted by: TheOnlyBilko
After shooting into the hallway, Paddock would be expecting the Police to show up at literally any minute. So why did he wait the 6 minutes before starting to shoot from the windows?
Bleeding out maybe? 6 minutes is indeed a long time in all this, even if the gunman shot and killed Jesus, 6 minutes is still a long time to go undetected after firing 200 rounds in a busy hotel.
Perhaps Jesus was a complication and, after being discovered by him, they had to change their plan and that 6 minutes was the planning phase?
Or maybe, if it was Paddock simply having snapped, he was having a change of heart and trying to psyche himself up?
The sad fact is, we'll never know.
I wonder if phorensics can tell if he was crying as he shot his victims...
originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask
Not all of them were. Yes I know he did have 100rnd mags...but really...he dumped 2 of them into the hall...like he dumped 100rnds blind into the hall...then dumped 100 more?? Like sure I can see letting loose one 100rnd mag sure...but to reload and dump the second...then go to the window and let lose for another few min and hundreds of rounds. Doesn't sound like a very smart plan by someone who was so thought out.
originally posted by: Mandroid7
originally posted by: Sabz228
originally posted by: Mandroid7
This whole story is off.
This video is floating around now. it shows the singer giving a que, and people running from the gunfire prematurely.
Psyops were legalized by Obama, so good luck prosecuting.
That video is edited and faked...
here is the original
Reply to:sabz228
what is edited?
looks the same in both videos
Same comment was on 4chan claiming it's fake
GO to 3:30 and watch the crowd pile out before shooting starts
Looks like the official story is starting to fall apart.
originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: carewemust
So in that article it says the guard began approaching then was shot by some of the well over 200 rounds he fired into the hall. So now its well over 200...and he began approaching sounds like he got shot before he made it to the door.
Well...tucked into the end of the article it says he did have cameras set up to watch the hall...but they say he wasn't using them at the time of the shooting, so how the f*#% did the shooter know someone was approaching and why/how could he have hit him but not killed him with well over 200 rounds if he knew where the guy was somehow.
Also the cops were checking the 31st floor but they had a door ajar alarm on the 32nd floor...so they let the security guard head past to move into an unsecure area while they knew there was a shooter...so he could check a door ajar alarm??? Does that seem remotely like cop crime scene security SOP??? Let some security guard go check it out while they cleared the 31st???
I call bollox on that article or whoever is telling them them that crap!
originally posted by: and14263
Question - in the UK people launder money by talking cash to a casino, changing it into chips then changing it back and requesting a receipt/written verification. Gambling money is tax free in the UK and there is no trail as to where the £thousands came from.
In Vegas can this be done? Can someone take money from a dodgey deal, change it into chips and come back an hour later and get it back in cash??
originally posted by: TobyFlenderson
a reply to: trollz
This is odd because there was nothing reported on the radio scanners about it. I wouldn't be surprised if he reported it to his security boss and they kept it in-house not realizing the full extent about what was to go on.