BOMBSHELL: Health Ranger id's distance of 2nd shooter at LV massacre and it’s NOT the MB hotel

originally posted by: Granite
Here it is right now:

Not finished yet, but one thing that I question with his analysis so far...he claims second shooter at 250-270yds, wouldn't he have to make the assumption that all the bullets "hitting pavement" as he is, would be hitting the pavement in the same spot relative to the microphone location? Wouldn't the overall timing change if the shooter were "spraying" the crowd?

In summary, Mike used his mass spectrometer to get very accurate "schedule" of the sound waves from the typical video recording. This result showed 450 ft for shooter #1 (Manadaly Bay range) and 250 ft for the second shooter. Mike drew a circle on his map 250 ft from ground zero. Within this range, is AM PM, Catholic shrine, Oasis Apartments and a dirt hill.

Mike said it is up to authorities to investigate to triangulate where the 2nd shooter was located. They have access to the crime scene and should find a lot of spent brass, bullet holes in walls, etc..

He offered to send his Excel spreadsheet to authorities for them use.
He mocked the lone shooter narrative the FBI is spreading thru fake news.

a reply to: Granite

Mike used his mass spectrometer

Interesting.
Mass Spectrometer

originally posted by: Ranger351

originally posted by: Granite
Here it is right now:

Not finished yet, but one thing that I question with his analysis so far...he claims second shooter at 250-270yds, wouldn't he have to make the assumption that all the bullets "hitting pavement" as he is, would be hitting the pavement in the same spot relative to the microphone location? Wouldn't the overall timing change if the shooter were "spraying" the crowd?

The answer is a mass spectrometer is providing a perfect record on which to do the forensics...and his point about the bullet is hitting just a split second prior to the gunfire sound waves.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Granite

Mike used his mass spectrometer

Interesting.
Mass Spectrometer

Please elaborate...how does one get the precise timing of the sound waves without a mass spectrometer?

a reply to: Granite

One does not get the timing of sound waves with a mass spectrometer. Precise or otherwise.
en.wikipedia.org...

a reply to: Granite

How from the audio do you determine what is an originating shot vs the echo of a originating shot. If you don’t model the area by computer to determine how the sound will travel, tag what are echoes, isolate echoes from the audio, the analysis is useless.

a reply to: neutronflux
Mass spectrometry, of course.

a reply to: Granite
He's got you on specific semantics.
Audio Spectrum Analysis.
Still two rifles though..

a reply to: Phage

Is that like a flux capacitor?

a reply to: UnderKingsPeak

Not unless that "mass spectrograph" does magic.

a reply to: neutronflux
No. It's a real thing.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Granite

One does not get the timing of sound waves with a mass spectrometer. Precise or otherwise.
en.wikipedia.org...

Well, right 50 seconds to 1:20 seconds he mentions he used a mass spectrometer.
Please re-watch the beginning and tell us where Mike is incorrect.

a reply to: Granite

Well, right 50 seconds to 1:20 seconds he mentions he used a mass spectrometer.

If that's what he said, he's an idiot as well as a snakeoil salesman who revels in clickbait.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Granite

Well, right 50 seconds to 1:20 seconds he mentions he used a mass spectrometer.

If that's what he said, he's an idiot as well as a snakeoil salesman who revels in clickbait.

No, please re-watch the beginning and mention precisely where Mike is wrong.

a reply to: Granite
I've showed you, twice, what a mass spectrometer is and does.

originally posted by: Granite

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Granite

One does not get the timing of sound waves with a mass spectrometer. Precise or otherwise.
en.wikipedia.org...

Well, right 50 seconds to 1:20 seconds he mentions he used a mass spectrometer.
Please re-watch the beginning and tell us where Mike is incorrect.

A mass spectrometer measures mass in physical and chemical compounds, if I am not mistaken.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Granite
I've showed you, twice, what a mass spectrometer is and does.

And I have clicked your links and read the contents.
What I am asking for you to please watch the beginning of video where he explains in detail the lab equipment and analysis techniques he is an expert at to make a nice living.
Explain where Mike is incorrect.

a reply to: Granite

No. I don't go for clickbait.
A mass spectrometer has nothing to do with sound.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Granite

No. I don't go for clickbait.
A mass spectrometer has nothing to do with sound.

You are proving you did not watch ANY the video...