It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: queenofswords
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
Was Charles Whitman evil? He had a brain tumor. Can we rightfully call him evil after the fact? Is brain tumor evil?
If his brain tumor caused him to perpetrate this horrendous act causing him to hallucinate or something, then evil is absent. However, if he was despondent, bitter, and angry because he was dealt the tumor card, and decided to lash out in that state of mind, then THAT is evil. You know it when you see it.
There is a whole host of things that make it evil.
originally posted by: randyvs
originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: introvert
As I said, when you see evil, you just know it.
There are actually people walking around this world upright
saying they don't believe evil exists?
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: knowledgehunter0986
Are you sure? Can you imagine doing "evil" things to others, being fully sane and with 100% conscience? No matter how angry you are at others, can you see yourself making the ultimate leap?
I think it's definitely possible for a perfectly sane person to commit an evil act.
originally posted by: Liquesence
But WHY are they this way?
That is the question....
originally posted by: knowledgehunter0986
a reply to: Deaf Alien
I think the problem is determining what is considered evil. Morals in general are highly subjective.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: ketsuko
Writing about doing evil things and actually doing evil things are quite different.