It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
an obvious question :
if this allegation is true :
WHY ?
or more specifically - why is " 2 or more gunmen working to a common purpose " a taboo subject ???
i personallly dont see it as any sort of issue - if there are one , 2 , 7 gunmen
so why this conspiracist obsession that alledged " second gunmen " are being " covered up " ??????????????
originally posted by: MarioOnTheFly
I hear nothing obvious in this video that would point to a second shooter.
I'm not ruling it out though.
Can someone explain...which part points to it ?
originally posted by: MarioOnTheFly
I hear nothing obvious in this video that would point to a second shooter.
I'm not ruling it out though.
Can someone explain...which part points to it ?
originally posted by: TheJesuit
Why aren't the police, fbi, Homeland security, or any other investigators asking publicly for footage from phone users or otherwise to get footage ?
Is it really a open and shut case to placate the herd?(by herd I mean the public/you) if you think of the American people as cows to be herded then the narrative fits. Because there are people screaming on social alt media and also Facebook that are witness that are saying otherwise of the official narrative .
Metal detectors/scanners , antifa, socialism, isis believe it or not is big business billions of your tax dollars at work.
originally posted by: WhyDidIJoin
originally posted by: MarioOnTheFly
I hear nothing obvious in this video that would point to a second shooter.
I'm not ruling it out though.
Can someone explain...which part points to it ?
How about the fact a 65 year old man managed to hit people in the middle of the night, 35 stories high and 300 metres away.
originally posted by: AnonymousTi
originally posted by: MarioOnTheFly
I hear nothing obvious in this video that would point to a second shooter.
I'm not ruling it out though.
Can someone explain...which part points to it ?
From 0:48 seconds to 1:20 seconds you can tell its not echo's or impacts. The shooter is slightly over 400 meters from the target. The speed of sound is 340meters/s which means echos should only take about 1.2 seconds.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: 727Sky
n
There were camera's that someone had set up in the hall way to observe anyone approaching his room.
Hotel corridors are all under cctv observation. You can't go anywhere in Las Vegas and not be on camera except your own hotel room or the restrooms. There are cameras everywhere. No one set up a camera to watch him specifically.
originally posted by: opethPA
originally posted by: WhyDidIJoin
originally posted by: MarioOnTheFly
I hear nothing obvious in this video that would point to a second shooter.
I'm not ruling it out though.
Can someone explain...which part points to it ?
How about the fact a 65 year old man managed to hit people in the middle of the night, 35 stories high and 300 metres away.
I know right..22000 people in tight compressed area would be so hard to hit ..Hell with only 22k people tightly packed you couldnt even spray and pray..
Or not.
originally posted by: Taggart
originally posted by: opethPA
originally posted by: WhyDidIJoin
originally posted by: MarioOnTheFly
I hear nothing obvious in this video that would point to a second shooter.
I'm not ruling it out though.
Can someone explain...which part points to it ?
How about the fact a 65 year old man managed to hit people in the middle of the night, 35 stories high and 300 metres away.
I know right..22000 people in tight compressed area would be so hard to hit ..Hell with only 22k people tightly packed you couldnt even spray and pray..
Or not.
65, 1/4 mile away, no scope in darkness. - Just saying.