Mutiple shooters confirmed by taxi driver footage WE are being lied too.1st 2 Mins vid

As you can see and hear there is at least two different shooters from just the audio alone it pretty obvious

I wonder how long the media will push" lone gunman" as the footage gets posted will these questions be answered or even addressed

90% ofAmerica is watching MSM its only a few that visit these sites and actually watch .


www.youtube.com...

originally posted by: TheJesuit
As you can see and hear there is at least two different shooters from just the audio alone it pretty obvious

I wonder how long the media will push" lone gunman" as the footage gets posted will these questions be answered or even addressed

90% ofAmerica is watching MSM its only a few that visit these sites and actually watch .


www.youtube.com...

Thanks for posting, interesting if true.

However, it is a ~20 minute video - could you point to a specific point where it is obvious?

Hotel Guest Next Door To Las Vegas Shooter Saw ‘Multiple Gunmen’

Don´t know much about the source and if it is credible!

a reply to: TheJesuit

Wow, nice find. That ain't no echo. Definitely 2 different locations. Could it be one of the strike teams firing back?

a reply to: DupontDeux

Fast forward to the 4:57 mark.

an obvious question :

if this allegation is true :

WHY ?

or more specifically - why is " 2 or more gunmen working to a common purpose " a taboo subject ???

i personallly dont see it as any sort of issue - if there are one , 2 , 7 gunmen

so why this conspiracist obsession that alledged " second gunmen " are being " covered up " ??????????????

a reply to: ignorant_ape

In all seriousness, the lone wolf story serves a purpose in the narrative.

a reply to: ignorant_ape


To me it is a big deal. They need to get the facts straight. What if it was your wife that was killed. Wouldn't you want the facts straight and the proper people brought to justice?????

I hear nothing obvious in this video that would point to a second shooter.

I'm not ruling it out though.

Can someone explain...which part points to it ?

originally posted by: ignorant_ape



[...] why is " 2 or more gunmen working to a common purpose " a taboo subject ???

Because then it becomes an actual conspiracy. And it then legitimately becomes a question of the size of the conspiracy.

And you would not want to legitimise or just lend credence to those pesky conspiracy theorists, would you?

a reply to: TheJesuit

What you're hearing is ECHOS...Echos...echos...

a reply to: watchitburn

hm..on second hearing...I'm not sure about that.

The echo is simply not consistent, if it is echo...every shot should be echoed, no ?


edit:

perhaps the gunman changed weapons during the firing. Perhaps that could explain the differences in shot sounds ?

originally posted by: MarioOnTheFly
I hear nothing obvious in this video that would point to a second shooter.

I'm not ruling it out though.

Can someone explain...which part points to it ?

From 0:48 seconds to 1:20 seconds you can tell its not echo's or impacts. The shooter is slightly over 400 meters from the target. The speed of sound is 340meters/s which means echos should only take about 1.2 seconds.

Wasn't he in a corner suite? Windows facing different directions?

a reply to: AnonymousTi

The speed of sound is 340meters/s which means echos should only take about 1.2 seconds.

I agree...the time to "echo" is too long.

originally posted by: Domo1
Wasn't he in a corner suite? Windows facing different directions?

that too could explain the sound difference. If he was switching windows...and directions of firing.

As i ex freedom fighter, i could tell There is defo two different locations where firing comming from..

a reply to: watchitburn

The question here is about the different volumes, not the echoes I believe.

originally posted by: Pandaram
As i ex freedom fighter, i could tell There is defo two different locations where firing comming from..

or..different directions of firing..

firing towards you or away from you..the sound will be different.

originally posted by: Domo1
Wasn't he in a corner suite? Windows facing different directions?

It appears he was but the other window that was broken was only 45degrees off angle at most.