It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: IAMTAT
Well, if you believe the picture of the perp (dead) is real, then it would seem to me to suggest he was rolled over upon discovery, whereupon congealed blood flooded out of the exit wound in the top back of his skull onto the carpet. This would explain the two different types of blood stains on the carpet below his head. It would also tend to explain how why some of the shell casings have blood on top of them which appears congealed like the blood on the carpet, and some don't (because the thinner blood just flooded the carpet underneath them.
Just my opinion, but whatever.
originally posted by: 0x6372756d6273
Guys, we really need to discuss this.
SWAT claimed they had to breach the connecting door to 32-134. That is because these doors have two deadbolts, one on each side, so the room can be rented individually and locked by either party.
That means the shooter, who is claimed to have been shooting out both windows, at some point locked the connecting door from the inside and went out the front door of 32-134.
If Stephen was the only shooter, that means he went back into 32-135 front door, barricaded the door with furniture, continued to shoot at security officer through the door, and then killed himself at one point. None of that makes sense....
Why was that inner door locked? Why was it locked from the inside so that anyone in 32-135 couldn't get into 32-134? Why have an elaborate camera system set up through room 32-134 if you are just going to walk out the front door past the camera?
It almost seems like someone trapped Stephen in the room, and then shot at the front door of 32-135 any time he tried to escape.
On that note, I am not buying the security guard story. They want us to believe an unarmed security guard was trying to enter room 32-135 because the door was ajar, and he found that it was barricaded, then got shot. All the security guard had was a baton.
Who in the right mind brings a baton to an automatic rifle fight?
For those that still don't understand the layout of the room, and the fact that two rooms were rented:
www.nbcnews.com...
But a week later, he rented two rooms at the Mandalay Bay and opened fire on the Route 91 Harvest festival 32 floors below, killing 58 people
Here is a walk through of the exact room:
www.youtube.com...
This has a very nice panorama of the room near the bottom, and on the far right is the "door to the next hotel room".
www.nytimes.com...
We need more information about what happened inside of 32-134... Someone locked it from the inside, and walked right out the front door. I highly doubt he walked right into 32-135 because it was barricaded. I think they escaped. They trapped Stephen in and he had no choice but to kill himself.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: IAMTAT
Well, if you believe the picture of the perp (dead) is real, then it would seem to me to suggest he was rolled over upon discovery, whereupon congealed blood flooded out of the exit wound in the top back of his skull onto the carpet. This would explain the two different types of blood stains on the carpet below his head. It would also tend to explain how why some of the shell casings have blood on top of them which appears congealed like the blood on the carpet, and some don't (because the thinner blood just flooded the carpet underneath them.
Just my opinion, but whatever.
originally posted by: 0x6372756d6273
Wow, I am not alone. Check out 4:38 on this video.
So the security guard didn't help stop anything.
originally posted by: firerescue
a reply to: judydawg
Correct and if he was suicidal why not by a LEO in a blaze of glory shooting as he goes down...
Because chance would only be wounded and survive
He did not want to wind up in jail (like his father) for rest of life
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: yuppa
Not really. They stay the same color actually. However, the skin darkens to a blue-grey color, making them less prominent, less contrast. Remember, tats are usually blue and black. Would one disappear? I don't think so, personally.
So, I have no explanation for the apparent discrepancy. I lead off the post with "if you believe the picture". The other photos seem pretty consistent with that one, but they all could be faked for all I know.
One thing I am reasonably confident in is the carpet color and pattern. So, if these photos were faked, then someone did one hell of a job on the photoshop efforts and staging.