It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: nonspecific
I enjoyed Enterprise. The one I didn't like was DS9. I just couldn't get into it. No idea why though.
I noticed in the trailer that they looked on the younger side, but if you watch the recent films, they all seem pretty young too. Or it could just be we're getting older
originally posted by: nonspecific
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: nonspecific
I enjoyed Enterprise. The one I didn't like was DS9. I just couldn't get into it. No idea why though.
I noticed in the trailer that they looked on the younger side, but if you watch the recent films, they all seem pretty young too. Or it could just be we're getting older
I find most of the startreks are terrible to start out with and DS9 in particuar. Give it another go and force your way through the first half of S1.
originally posted by: eriktheawful
I also liked Enterprise, it was different and refreshing to see them take us back in a time before the "Federation", just to see what it was like.
I know a lot of hard core fans were unhappy with it because it wasn't the same as TNG, DS9 and Voyager, and hard core fans tend to be very unflexable and demanding.
The Stargate universe is a great example of that. SGU was much darker and different and the hard core fans screamed so loud about it, bam, the show was gone. But, that bit them in the rear end too. No more Stargate at all.
I think fans should have some input, but I think they also need to realize that you have to be tolerant, else you can really hurt the franchise. I didn't really care for DS9 that much, but I also knew that there were people who loved it, so I was happy for them, knowing that eventually another ST show would come along that I would like, and sure enough, Voyager came out.
So yah, hard core fans need to learn how to share and not get greedy and demanding everything be their way.
originally posted by: Nyiah
I'm going to borrow Erik's format and give my take on Discovery here.
I missed the CBS broadcast last night, and therefore had to watch it elsewhere online.
Suffice it to say we're going to be paying for the All-Access subscription after next payday, Discovery alone is more than worth the $6. Right off the bat here, I'm going to give the show a 9 on a scale of 1 to 10.
I like Burnham. Some don't, some do, and many others are still trying to figure if she's a yay or nay character. To be honest, it remains to be seen with future episodes, but thus far, I do find her very intriguing as a Human, but raised with Vulcan ideals and expectations.
I think the inner conflict of trying to be both at once comes through well, the Vulcan logic and precision coupled with natural Human impulsiveness and uncertainty shines, and the arrogance of both kind of acting as the threads binding both cultures together in Burnham.
It's a pretty good overall allegory for what we (real life humans) want to be, versus who we are by nature. I can appreciate that, it's very relatable, and Martin-Green did a damn good job bringing it to life.
I wasn't going to let the make-up change regarding the Klingons impact my perception of the portrayal of the culture, so it didn't bother me that they're bald & more "hard alien" in appearance. I actually like it, it's a visual merge between TOS appearances, and TNG & subsequent series.
It was a gutsy choice, but if you can deal with TOS-era Kor and not be put off by him & the other human-like Klingons (retcon explanation or no retcon explanation) and still appreciate DS9-era Kor, as well as going from short-haired Klingons in TOS, to bald Klingons in the movies, long-haired Klingons in TNG & later -- and vice versa -- then this is an OK nod to those series predecessors to adapt to. That's just my personal take, though.
The one thing they remedied on Discovery that always bugged me was the lack of very different skin tones. It just did not seem feasible that an empire of warriors that apparently has a population large enough to absorb & replace their fallen without much detriment to the population size & empire stability** doesn't have enough genetic variation to provide....varying skin tones beyond brown.
**Although the Qo'noS population is around 3-4 billion, it's not as large as one would have expected for a warrior race. However, it's only Qo'noS, and doesn't include colony populations across the empire.
As Erik mentioned, whatever political BS people expected to immediately crap on was not there to do so. I'm sure story allegories will be in there at some point, but the major focus is on the Klingons and The Federation coming to a head.
And again, as Erik mentioned, the SFX are top-notch. I have zero complaints there, they did an excellent job on the SFX aesthetics.
If these first 2 episodes are any indication, the show is very high quality writing, acting & visuals, and has the strong potential to re-iginite many more years of additional series.
if you have a problem with being taught lessons in morality by a science fiction show.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
Well I finished watching the 1st 2 episodes. I like it, A LOT.
Yeah, there's some things that seem a bit weird just now.
-The show assumes you know ST already.
-The story is very focused on a person who isn't a captain.
-Klingons. I'm sure we'll get told why they look like they do, but they're just weird. It's almost like someone made a parody of ST and didn't want to pay copyright fees.
That being said,
-The CGI is outstanding.
-The characters and their scripts feel natural.
-It feels like watching ST!
So far, I would give it a good 8/10.