It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: muzzleflash
What makes you an expert in identifying all aircraft worldwide and puts you in the "0.1% of the world that can identify aircraft"?... Where did you get that number from?...
I have had dreams of being inside some spaceships but don't think it means I was abducted. I was trained in the military in identifying aircraft, but I am not the only one. Everyone who has trained in aviation warfare knows how to identify different aircraft, and there are many of us all around the world who went through that training. That still doesn't put any of us in a "top 0.1%" list.
You make exaggerated claims that make me thing the whole thing was made up by you. Can't believe this is the top story in ATS.
You describe yourself as being self-centered and not caring about what happens around the world, and only caring about things that happen to you. Why would any intelligent beings communicate or even abduct you?
And who is JT?
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: muzzleflash
My experience was for me.
As I read your account, what I found was two distinct aspects.
One, the lights overhead and two, the abduction itself.
From your accounting of the time in the ship, it sounded to me as if you were in a dream or maybe fugue state. I say this because of the emphasis you placed on aspects of the experience. For one, finding oneself in an abduction situation would, it seems to me, have you blown out of your mind the whole time. Know what I mean?
Another little bit was the lights over head. Who knows what they were, maybe physical and maybe not. One of the things that I came away with from my experiences so long ago was that physical manifestations from the other realm, or the higher realm or whatever we wish to call it are rare and this is do to the amount of energy needed to make the manifestation.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: muzzleflash
Certain elements suggest you had an out of body experience...
originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: muzzleflash
Anyway. The Aliens used the screen memory process on you. Your body was prolly still back on the ground and they took your consciousness onboard the craft. a forced Out of body experiance. I know y agonna ask...what about feeling sick and throwing up? That was to further confuse you as to not actually being there except in astral form. It just instasntly went away right? it was because it wasnt actually real.
originally posted by: muzzleflash
originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: muzzleflash
Anyway. The Aliens used the screen memory process on you. Your body was prolly still back on the ground and they took your consciousness onboard the craft. a forced Out of body experiance. I know y agonna ask...what about feeling sick and throwing up? That was to further confuse you as to not actually being there except in astral form. It just instasntly went away right? it was because it wasnt actually real.
Ok at least you devised an explanation for why I puked while astral traveling.
But one thing I'm actually blown away by is this hardened determination and ceaseless insistence on saying "You weren't really there man, you were there but you weren't there".
Like I don't get it. Why is everyone so adamant that it "MUST BE" some form of astral traveling?
Does it make any difference in the end? If I astral projected onto a ship and met aliens, or if I was teleported onto the ship and met aliens, I don't see why this distinction is such a hard-line ideological issue.
I mean theoretically either is possible right?
Do any of us really know either way which it was or even which is more probable?
No we don't actually know.
This is the new frontier, undiscovered territory.
I just feel like we're getting trapped into irrelevant distinctions and I am very very surprised to see so many people are just so certain they know which one of the two it is.
This thing happened to me and I don't know which it was. I'm a pretty cognizant guy, if there was any solid indications I would have mentioned them. The vomiting thing was my only clue it was physical rather than astral. But if we're going to throw out the only clue favoring one over the other, what's the point?
I am going to argue that because I have at least 1 solid clue pointing to one over the other theory, that it seems more probable and likely that it was that one over the other one. It isn't definitive, but I have one clue. Sure, that clue could have been planted there to deceive me into thinking it was one and not the other, but what's so incredibly important about creating this deception anyways? Why confound and mislead me on this one seemingly irrelevant detail? It doesn't seem to make much sense.
originally posted by: KansasGirl
Here is a question: these abduction experiences, would they be different if we didn't have the "Star Trek" TV series? I just find it....curious that a lot of the descriptions of technology, etc. in these ships often are similar to Star Trek.
originally posted by: muzzleflash
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: muzzleflash
What makes you an expert in identifying all aircraft worldwide and puts you in the "0.1% of the world that can identify aircraft"?... Where did you get that number from?...
I have had dreams of being inside some spaceships but don't think it means I was abducted. I was trained in the military in identifying aircraft, but I am not the only one. Everyone who has trained in aviation warfare knows how to identify different aircraft, and there are many of us all around the world who went through that training. That still doesn't put any of us in a "top 0.1%" list.
You make exaggerated claims that make me thing the whole thing was made up by you. Can't believe this is the top story in ATS.
You describe yourself as being self-centered and not caring about what happens around the world, and only caring about things that happen to you. Why would any intelligent beings communicate or even abduct you?
And who is JT?
99% of the population could not identify more than 5 aircraft by name if you showed them photographs. They simply don't care about anything like that, nor will they. They might be able to ID a B747 but they definitely won't know variants.
In that 1 % that does note a few names and learns this information - less than 10% of them are really proficient at it. Like, for example, they probably couldn't identify an F-111 or a Saab Viggen, and they wouldn't know their Hueys from their Cobras.
But who can, by just merely looking at an aircraft, tell a normal F-111 Aardvark from a Sparkvark? I could just glance at it and tell you which one is EW...
Tail mounted receiver pod, EF-111A Raven.
The one in the back (darker colored) is the Aardvark.
I'm not an expert on avionics or engines like Zaph is though.
He definitely knows way more configurations than I do.
But still, this is an extremely small community of people that learn this information.
It's probably .01% of the population.
.1% was me playing it safe.
originally posted by: toysforadults
Welcome to my world.
I had been contact by the nordics as well and had the sphere/ orb experience.
originally posted by: putnam6
Im telling you,you ned to go to TJ and confess this story to her before its too late. You have a unique opportunity to become a human ambassador to no doubt the Asguardians but other races as well. In fact it could be the first step to disclosure of the UFO phenomenon. You got to show her your mind is open and willing to accept that she is an Asguardian,though I suspect there are other unions like this, who knows yours might be the first, take advantage and go live among the stars,spread humanity where you go.
You have no idea what you're talking about here.
Physical = exists.
Not physical = doesn't exist.
originally posted by: CynConcepts
So I ask again, has your family ever mentioned even nervously, seeing UFOs?
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: muzzleflash
You have no idea what you're talking about here.
Physical = exists.
Not physical = doesn't exist.
Ah, a materialist.. Never mind.
My ''speculation'' was of course only speculation. It was based on a slightly different understanding of reality. That what we know of as physical is only one state of realities potential. As you clearly are not wont to even consider that I see no reason to continue with this. Bye
originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: ElectricUniverse
And who is JT?
He's probably talking about John Titor??
I'm still waiting for his answer on getting a brain scan for a headache instead of taking aspirin or ibuprofen.