The Colonel on Republicans

Here is another dem in trouble. This guy is an idiot. Ruined our whole state. Wasted every penny CA had.And he had a budbet surplus to work with.

Recall milestone claimed
www.bayarea.com...

Your right about one thing Colonel,this is to easy.

Hmmm. Black sell out. Are you Black, ever been??
You dare assume my motivations.

I say you are a POS. I hope you are good with acronyms, because you are not very good at constructive debate. Your only talent, besides being an asshat, is making your fraud of a political party look even more patheitic- I am glad to be under the Big Tent, not the big Pile.

Yes, I am black and yes, you are a sell out too. No self-respecting black person could join a party that tries to keep them back. How could you even think to be associated with them after the Florida election---that could've been YOU down there being culled from those voter rolls by republicans with the rest of the black populace. Pathetic. You disgust me.

Originally posted by Tassadar
Ok Letz go back in time to the last time we had a good president,

Bush: no, u said he was bad
Clinton: dirty boy
Bush: related 2 Bush

(skip a few)

what, JFK?- he got killed by the government, or someone anyways.

Who do you suggest for President Colonel? BIll Gates, Kianna Reeves, Shaq? I really can't hink of a good one so we might as well accept it or move to Canada, sry.

Tassadar

Clinton was dirty but which president wasn't. I posted an article here about the gay call boys scandal running thru the White House during Bush 1.

Clinton offered prosperity tho which we had with our trilion dollar surplus. And, truth to tell, he WAS trying to be like JFK.

[Edited on 3-7-2003 by Colonel]

Clinton had the trillion dollar surplus because Bush Sr. brought our econmoy back after desert storm and liberating Kuwait!

That was Bush that brought our economy forward, not Clinton. Clinton had no political experience except for being governor of Arkansas or whatever for 17 years. Bush was a rich oil man,
who do you think could make more money?

That money you say Bush Jr. wastes his being spent on the people of the United States, Afghanistahn, Iraq, Liberia, etc...

Can you name a good democratic President from the past 100 years?

Tassadar

Originally posted by Tassadar
Clinton had the trillion dollar surplus because Bush Sr. brought our econmoy back after desert storm and liberating Kuwait!

That was Bush that brought our economy forward, not Clinton. Clinton had no political experience except for being governor of Arkansas or whatever for 17 years. Bush was a rich oil man,
who do you think could make more money?

That money you say Bush Jr. wastes his being spent on the people of the United States, Afghanistahn, Iraq, Liberia, etc...

Can you name a good democratic President from the past 100 years?

Tassadar

Ya know. I like you that's why I won't be so harsh. But, that is not true what you wrote. At the time Bush was in office, unemployment was as high as it is now, we were running a massive deficit from the Reagan years, and our country was depressed.

That's why Clinton ran with the phrase "It's the economy, stupid." HE brought the 8 yrs of prosperity---not any of the Bushes which is evidenced from the fact that we have ANOTHER Bush in office and we are back to the same depressing economy.

The economy runs in cycles.It sucked under Carter,was good for a few years under Reagan,Bush got it going again by the end of his term,in fact I more work than I could handle by the of Bush Sr. term, Under Clinton it was good for a few years,and started to slump the last two. Bush Jr got an economy that was crash,if Gore was presisent he would be having the same problems.

K, you've got a point,
Bush is wasting the country's money on his private 'lil war that's alraedy killed thousands and yes, the tax cut doesn't help at all.

But even the democrats have been complementing Bush's action's.
This may sound a 'lil self righteous and cruel but you must have noticed the drop in gas prices haven't you.

Part of the reason the economy is so low is because we're still recovering from 9/11 2 years ago. Bush had no, well, I think Bush had no control over that.

Tassadar

Of course there was a deficit after Reagan. War costs. The War which was won by Reagan was the Cold War. He ran the Soviets into the ground. Of course, you leftists want to cut Reagan out of the equation as it is disturbing that, once again, you guys were wrong. All a leftist or a liberal wanted was to appease the Soviet Empire,either because they were sympathetic to them or out of fear. Depands on the particular one. Reagan knew the truth and was unafraid to get the job done. Luckily he was able to do it, elsewise the democrats would have come along and we'd still be in that battle, or basking in a radioactive sunburst.

As far as the deficit, let's not forget who cut taxes from an absurd level, which allowed more people to keep what's theirs so they could spend it or invest, and corporations were able to expand and grow, creating a larger tax base from which the government got even MORE money. A concept democrats have never grasped; you cannot tax (steal) your way to prosperity.

What happened to you man? You used to make true and valid points, real and honest responses... and now its just the party line propaganda and BS!!

Amazing!! I thought you were one of the few thinking republicans but I and others now see that is no longer the case. Its too bad really, although our political preferences may differ I always thought you'd be a guy I wouldn't mind sitting down with and have a cold beer or two.

I do so often with other republican friends, we share and discuss ideas in an open minded manner but once the rightwing brainwashing takes affect as it has with you, that open mindedness is no longer there.

So sad. Perhaps someday you'll be able to see what shrub and cheney have done, how wrong they've been. Until then... peace.

Originally posted by Colonel

Hmmm. Black sell out. Are you Black, ever been??
You dare assume my motivations.

I say you are a POS. I hope you are good with acronyms, because you are not very good at constructive debate. Your only talent, besides being an asshat, is making your fraud of a political party look even more patheitic- I am glad to be under the Big Tent, not the big Pile.

Yes, I am black and yes, you are a sell out too. No self-respecting black person could join a party that tries to keep them back. How could you even think to be associated with them after the Florida election---that could've been YOU down there being culled from those voter rolls by republicans with the rest of the black populace. Pathetic. You disgust me.

I assume you are good with acronyms. POS

I am glad I disgust you. It is you who I want to disgust. You need to be made to feel at home. A slave to the neo-conventions of the neo-democrat. What- and I hope the Caucasion folk here won't mind- makes you think that those wealthy white democrats have your best interest in mind? I harbour no such illusions my friend. I am my own man.
You spout invective and vile rhetoric to give pading to your twisted political view. It shows in your lack of history. Do you think that democrats have always been the party of MLK or what?! Are you duped as well?

As I asked YOU before with no response: where were the Democrats when we were being lynched?? Democrats in 1836 showed no compunction to go against slavery- they were too busy worrying about re-election. You need to At- Ease your crap and name calling.

Like I said before, people like you are the reason I find the democratic party un-savory.

Just a little side note, a budget surplus is illegal according to our constitution. BTW, why do we associate prosperity with a rich self-feeding government when the people that earned the money that fuel it are punished for their toil?

The government might have been showing a profit in the 90s but I was sure paying through the teeth...I still am...More tax cuts!! Less government waste!!! 73% is too much to attribute to "incidental costs".

To all of you who have been appaulled at statements made in the name of the democratic party, please do not assume that all of us follow this neo-socialist drivel. Only those that assume they are (oh here comes that word again) entitled to take from those who earn it and re-distribute it to those who have made their choice to not try for nothing more than to add numbers to their political base.

Oh, and anote on sodamy since you brought it up....

Look, you can try with every last effort from message board posts to episode after episode of Will and Grace but the bulk of America will never except homosexuality as a norm. Why? because aside from all the fronts projected about the comical comradery of the males in these little sitcoms and the ideology that its just about snappy dressing or style, we all know that the one thing which has so many times been attempted to be camoflagued is the pure sexual act that cannot be forced upon a person who doesn't have the same deviant sexual desires. Thats what homosexuality boils down too. If a homosexual can't accept the thought of sex with a female, how then can we force the opposite on someone o views it in disgust?

A side note to this..sodamy with a minor should be (and is)illegal gay or straight, consenting or not. So, don't pull out the gay rights dialogue to explain this act away.

I am glad I disgust you. It is you who I want to disgust. You need to be made to feel at home. A slave to the neo-conventions of the neo-democrat. What- and I hope the Caucasion folk here won't mind- makes you think that those wealthy white democrats have your best interest in mind? I harbour no such illusions my friend. I am my own man.

Hmmm, let me give you a bit of edification, sell out.

Before, all the racist republicans WERE the Democrats. (Shocker) See, they were democrats who were quite happy to segregate, lynch, and hose blacks. Then, Lyndon Johnson came along with his Civil Rights Agenda for all and the democrats weren't having that.

So, the racist portion broke off and formed the Dixiecrats with Strom Thurman and his segratoinist platform going against Johnson. In any event, Johnnson won.

Then, seeing the the turmoil in the Democrat party on this ideological split on civil rights, the republicans created "The Southern Strategy" to recruit those disaffected racist democrats into their party.

Which forms the Republican party of today which you, black man, are apart of, sell out.

[Edited on 4-7-2003 by Colonel]

Originally posted by astrocreep
Just a little side note, a budget surplus is illegal according to our constitution. BTW, why do we associate prosperity with a rich self-feeding government when the people that earned the money that fuel it are punished for their toil?

The government might have been showing a profit in the 90s but I was sure paying through the teeth...I still am...More tax cuts!! Less government waste!!! 73% is too much to attribute to "incidental costs".

To all of you who have been appaulled at statements made in the name of the democratic party, please do not assume that all of us follow this neo-socialist drivel. Only those that assume they are (oh here comes that word again) entitled to take from those who earn it and re-distribute it to those who have made their choice to not try for nothing more than to add numbers to their political base.

Oh, GOd, did I mention that republicans were selfish and anti-Christian? Ok, In any event, why do we need to pay taxes for a financially strong government? So, maybe foreign investors will invest in America like they used to? So, maybe the dollar can still be the fiat currency worldwide instead of the Euro? I dunno. I think these are good things instead of some old man hording it til he's dead.

Government waste? Well, apparently the only part of government doing the real wasting is the Pentagon. They still can't account for a TRILLION dollars of taxpayer money...

Yet they can cut Veternas Bebfits by 25 billion....

And the republican will continue to blame the poor and the weak and begrudge them a decent existence from a lousy social program.

wowsey wowsey woo wooo.....

Originally posted by Tyriffic
wowsey wowsey woo wooo.....

Sorry, but its the truth and those very dixiecrats (former democrats) are alive today.

Originally posted by Colonel

Originally posted by Tyriffic
wowsey wowsey woo wooo.....

Sorry, but its the truth and those very dixiecrats (former democrats) are alive today.

Let me get this straight. You are calling Republicans former democrats who are now dixiecrats? You make no sense.

Or, are you blaming some other body??

Originally posted by Tyriffic
Let me get this straight. You are calling Republicans former democrats who are now dixiecrats? You make no sense.

Or, are you blaming some other body??

You're being silly. I said, the republicans of today were former democrats in the 50's and 60's. They despised the Civil Rights movement and became Dixiecrats. Then, with the help of the"Southern Strategy, became republicans.

You're being silly. I said, the republicans of today were former democrats in the 50's and 60's. They despised the Civil Rights movement and became Dixiecrats.


I think that is what I was asking you.
You need to go back a little further....................

You have not responded to any of MY statements.