Chapter Numbers and Verses are Inspired of the LORD.

a reply to: Noinden

You used the word Satan! You must be a Christian

a reply to: Noinden

That is your opinion. But I have proven it is true.

As you can prove your god of stone Cromeocha is real. This is why I said you like using old words. Like I wouldn't have known it was an old word like Gnoses is an old spelling that 99% of the population do not use like Cromeocha. I have followed many world religions, beliefs, worships, and faiths the following is from a book I have read and posses. It is from a book by G Higgins "The Celtic Druids" 1829.

These single stones in the British islands are very common They have no known name unless it be that of Cromleh To this there is no objection except that this name is given also at times to two others kinds of stones I shall adopt the Greek words Lithos and Lithoi In order to account for these Lithoi Cromlehs or Cromleacs every supposition has been made by different inquiring philosophers which human ingenuity could devise It is only necessary to notice that which seems to be the most probable Mr Toland explains the word Cromleac from the Irish crom to adore and leac stone stone of adoration But Crom was one of the Irish names of God Daghda was called Cromeocha the good Crom Crom cruadh or Crom cruach was the name of an idol celebrated in Ireland and in fine in ancient Irish the name of a priest was Cromar or Cruimthear that is servant or adorer of Crom Then Cromleac may mean the stone of Crom or of the Supreme God The Cromleac is also called Bothal from the Irish Both a house and al or Allah God This is evidently the ox non bit a or Bethel or house of God of the Hebrews This name is inscribed upon a Cromleac in the cavern at New Grange in Ireland where the most ancient inscriptions are to be found See Plates 19 20 21 The Cromleac was also called indealbha which M Pictet explains by iondealbha the image or symbol of Ion the God Supreme The word Ion is curious with reference to what we have seen of the Island of Iona Cromleacs are of three kinds the single Lithos or upright stone or pillar the same with a cross piece on the top and athird consisting of two upright stones fixed in the ground with a third at the top Why should not these have been figurative of the ancient Triad To distinguish the latter they have been called trilithons They are often much too lofty to have been any thing of the altar kind and are generally of very large unwrought stones The Trilithons are found in India on the coast of Malabar

I can get you a link to an online version if you wish but from using that word I figured you knew what it was and used it as such in your PM.

This book is one of the preeminent works on the Stone Henge and the Druids. They were a people, it was a lifestyle not just a position.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

No you haven't. You haven't proven a single thing true. All you've done is put your fingers in your ears and say "I'm right. Everything else is wrong" like some spoilt child.

Your failure was so bad you had to change your op lol.

a reply to: TerryDon79

Sorry I cannot prove anything to you it is a journey you must take. It will take you at least three years and you have to do it with a pure heart in wanting to know the TRUTH!

Are you willing to do this?

If so you shall know the TRUTH and it shall set you free.

otherwise step off

a reply to: ChesterJohn

So when you said this...

But I have proven it is true.

...it was just another one of your many lies you've been spouting.

Just like your threads. Full of "it's true!", but failing to actually prove a thing.

a reply to: TerryDon79

I dare you to prove it for yourself.

No one else just you and God and a heart will to let him teach you.

Are you willing to do it or not?

a reply to: ChesterJohn

I was a Christian (past tense). There's a few reasons I'm no longer one. A big part of it is there's no evidence. Not a single bit.

a reply to: TerryDon79

I'm accused of being an anti-Christian (Satanist) by these folks fairly often None the less like you, that moniker is not appropriate for me. In my case it never has been.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

You are not very good at picking your sources. A book from 1829. Really? You could have at least picked a modern scholar? But of course you don't know anything about the subject.

I will give you a hint: I have a very large library of books on mythology, lore, and the like. I've read them all.

Its not a old word. It is a title, in Gaelic. Just as my real name is Cymric, you can not have a hissy fit over that. Well you can, but it would be intellectually dishonest.

I'm a Celtic Reconstructionist, previously a NeoPagan Druid. You know nothing of our ways.

a reply to: Noinden

gave my reason on why I don't trust modern scholar and academia in the other thread.

Oh I know more than you think about your ways.

You can claim to be what you want, but as you stated you are a religious polygamist and that is about as honest as you have been.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

polytheist .
quick, edit before time runs out.

Unless you are equating polytheism with spiritual marriage to multiple deities.

ETA

That would depend upon the tradition and/or civilization. In most civilizations, only the royalty and priesthood were required to assume deity and marry deity. Common people were not compelled.

Religious celibacy does not necessarily equal atheism.

a reply to: TerryDon79

You never were a Christian, you are in denial of that truth.

What evidence would satisfy you?

I have given you the two most effective ways of gaining the proof for yourself.

Both of them you obviously do not want to try.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

So now you think you know me and my history? You dont even know yourself.

But keep it up. Showing your true atheism to people here is a good first step.

a reply to: TerryDon79

I am truly an Anti-Athiest.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

I doubt that. I reckon you're a full on atheist and just here to make real Christians look bad.

You don't even follow the bible you say you worship (that's idolatry, by the way).

a reply to: TerryDon79

you don't know the Bible well enough to know what your are talking about.

Take the challenge, are you afraid? Fear is a good thing, so go ahead and study the word of God in the AV with a pure heart and see what happens.

Any other heart will not do.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

Now I don't know the bible well enough? LOL

Remember, I've had to correct you, multiple times, in different threads, about the bible.

But you keep moving the goalposts.
First it was first death.
Then it was first "natural" death.
And the "5 letter words" nonesense? You've ignored all of the ones that don't confirm your (edited, because you were wrong) op.

Just add it to yet another, failed thread.

a reply to: TerryDon79

Ahh but remember this is someone who thinks he understands my religion, based on a book from 1829, about a different group entirely

Goal post shifting is sort of his thing

a reply to: Noinden

Well, he wouldn't want to say your religion predates his "preserved word of god". He'd probably cry lol.

a reply to: TerryDon79

Well it might predate it (I don't know how old that book he bought is ), but I admit my path is a modern one, based on an older ones.