It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
a reply to: neutronflux
They didn't really "collapse" at all.
What you believe and are asking people to believe is outside the realm of possible and you want to argue a case based on credulity?
originally posted by: SuicideKing33
a reply to: neutronflux
You're just doing what you are supposed to...keep the subject on the towers collapsing...that's why you keep asking people to explain it for you.
Telling the truth gets personal attacks? You mean you are "telling the truth?" By asking people to explain how buildings were demolished??? Wtf?
originally posted by: CajunMetal
One thing I don't get though: how'd they coerce the "let's roll" statement or get a regular guy under duress to act out the counter attack without it sounding suspicious to his partner?
Although there were high volumes traded on these days, for instance, they weren’t as exceptionally high as some sites like to claim. Here’s one analysis.
There were very good reasons to sell American Airlines shares, too, as they’d just announced a string of bad news. Read more here.
United Airlines stocks were falling in price, too. If investors anticipated they were about to release bad results then their put options would also be worth buying (although keep in mind that the UAL put volumes weren’t the highest in the year anyway).
originally posted by: CajunMetal
One thing I don't get though: how'd they coerce the "let's roll" statement or get a regular guy under duress to act out the counter attack without it sounding suspicious to his partner?
originally posted by: Willtell
originally posted by: CajunMetal
One thing I don't get though: how'd they coerce the "let's roll" statement or get a regular guy under duress to act out the counter attack without it sounding suspicious to his partner?
I don’t know if you’ve seen this, I posted it twice
Go to 17:00 and be SHOCKED and appalled...
This entire video answer’s your question
It deals with the impossibility of those cell phone calls being legit
Hijacking America's Mind on 9/11: Counterfeiting Evidence
originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
originally posted by: CajunMetal
One thing I don't get though: how'd they coerce the "let's roll" statement or get a regular guy under duress to act out the counter attack without it sounding suspicious to his partner?
But the calls were very "canned". People only generally hear what they they are told. In the case of Cee Cee Lyles she even whispered at the end of her message on her husband's answering machine, "it's a frame".
Pressure points of some kind would keep them on track for those calls, which all had an unusual, canned quality about them, as if they were working from a script that they'd been given. Maybe they were led to believe that their own lives depended on it, say, with the narrative of taking over the cockpit by slamming a cart into the door (which doesn't work), allowing for an alternative outcome. Something was motivating them not to go off script and blow the whistle, but Cee Cee Lyles went ahead and did it anyway at the of her message when she whispered "it's a frame".
This piece of independent research by an Icelander covers the calls aspect in great detail. It's horrifying.
Hijacking America's Mind on 9/11: Counterfeiting Evidence
Was there a need for it as propaganda? Why? Come to think of it we didn't hear about any other passenger heroism like this? Could it be they anticipated the need for it? That the public wouldn't believe that no one would try to stop it?