It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Indian woman divorce husband because dem no get toilet
One woman for India don get permission from court to divorce her husband because im no gree build toilet for dem house..
The woman wey dey for her 20's don dey married to her husband for five years, but na for inside bush she dey poopoo.
Indian law dey only allow divorce for limited circumstances like beating or wicked behaviour.
originally posted by: ChaoticOrder
-why it's good to have a news service utilizing broken English, etc ...
One woman for India don get permission from court to divorce her husband because im no gree build toilet for dem house..
The woman wey dey for her 20's don dey married to her husband for five years, but na for inside bush she dey poopoo.
Indian law dey only allow divorce for limited circumstances like beating or wicked behaviour.
originally posted by: paraphi
originally posted by: ChaoticOrder
-why it's good to have a news service utilizing broken English, etc ...
Because the BBC is a multi language broadcaster and pidgin is how English is spoken and read in some parts of the world.
originally posted by: Azureblue
a reply to: ChaoticOrder
I think you have an incorrect approaach on this one. These sorts of things all fall into the basket labeled "Dumming Down"
Immgrants are just the vehicle for the dumbing down journey.
If you want to legally watch live tv you need to have a tv licence and the money from it funds the bbc, yes it is wrong but it is now a decriminalised offence and you can own a tv or watch catchup or dvds ect just not as it streams live.
originally posted by: ChaoticOrder
Any form of media funded by mandatory taxes is clearly not a good thing and is what happens in communist nations with state sponsored TV.
originally posted by: audubon
originally posted by: ChaoticOrder
Any form of media funded by mandatory taxes is clearly not a good thing and is what happens in communist nations with state sponsored TV.
Why is it not a good thing? And the BBC is independent of the Government, so what happens in 'communist nations' is irrelevant.
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
Wait a second... Do you realise you are arguing that it is a good thing to have limited information through media outlets ?
originally posted by: audubon
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
Wait a second... Do you realise you are arguing that it is a good thing to have limited information through media outlets ?
No, because I'm not doing that.