It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: FHomerK
Lots of us have survival skills. From veterans to hunters and fishermen which are all over my area. The people that would survive any "apocalyptic event", would first have to be lucky enough to be in an area that is not the epicenter of such an event. Second, those people who think they can survive by themselves, or with just their family, will quickly learn that is not what happens in a shtf scenario.
originally posted by: Anathros
originally posted by: Reverbs
a reply to: FHomerK
its funny the responses in this thread almost all of which miss the mark on what was said. Some are focusing on Graham Hancock. Some on Ancient civilizations. Some on survival.
No Our CULTURE has no way of surviving. Only stories would remain and in one generation your kids are hearing about buildings and ekectricity without ever turning on a light. "Back in my day we were magic." basically.. That won't translate well to ywo or three generations.
The gods will be long dead by then.. Some notion of a Golden Age will remain. Some will tell stories of gods.
Anyway, can you imagine being reincarnated and finding some piece of a car in the jungle and having dejavu.. Like "I know what this is its an engine block."
but having no clue how you know this now you are a shaman or something haha..
I'm saying a country boy will survive anything short of a nuclear holocaust. There's very few of us that panic when the lights go out. We may not all be the professor from Gilligan's Island but most of us will get by.
Down here, we raise our own chickens for eggs, we can hunt, and we keep a garden every year. Lights go out, I won't be watching football but living off the land pretty much is our culture.
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: Harte
On the one hand, he's right that if there was an apocalypse, we wouldn't survive as our current culture.
You'd have to be an idiot not to see that.
On the other hand, he only tells lies, mischaracterizations, and half truths when he tries to convince the chronically astonished that he has any evidence at all of ancient advanced but unknown civilizations.
On balance, then, he's basically a con man, though not as bad as several others I could name.
Harte
And he's bad at modeling.
His scenario makes some romantically bad assumptions (the basis of every bad apocalyptic film and book around) = that every single group on Earth is either city-dwelling Americans or they're bush-dwelling primitives. He doesn't account for non-English speaking cultures (nor cultures like New Zealand.)
In his scenario, Earth is hit with the Great Stupidity Field where everyone walks outside and says "man, what just happened?" and then throws away all their tools and the bits and pieces of culture and technology (like, say, flush toilets) and it happens overnight.
So let's say the EMP took out the power grid everywhere. People would be upset, they'd be trying to figure out what was going on, they'd be trying to figure out how to save what food they have and how to get around and find out if friends and/or family are okay. We'd still have our tools and some of us would still report to work. Emergency services would regroup (and probably use bits and pieces from the "Zombie Apocalypse" scenario - municipalities and other agencies run disaster drills once every few years. "Zombie Apocalypse" was a recent one that they've been running.)
Globally it would take decades to get everything patched up, BUT, we would still have manuals, still have materials, still be able to fabricate things we need. We would still have libraries and hundreds of thousands of small home workshops (my husband has a one-man woodwork shop of his own.) In other countries where transportation and culture are different (Germany, for instance), the scenario would play out differently than in the US... as it would in countries that are mainly agricultural based.
Development would be slowed... if that happened, your flying car prototype will be delayed by decades. But we won't go back to knocking rocks together. There'll be new "how to" books, infrastructure changes (which could be good... a forced instant upgrade of the whole system) and many cultural changes.
But it's not going to knock us back to living in trees and fainting when we see sabertoothed cats.
So, I've got a new video game addiction on the PS4 called Elite Dangerous.
As it stands today, almost nothing of importance for survival skills or our culture is even documented in a manner that would not disintegrate over time (such as books) or require our currently existing technology to access the information (electronic data on computers and computer networks). As an IT professional, I've often thought this was ridiculous.
Lots of people know how to plant, and harvest vegies like tomatoes, pears, apples, etc. But if you don't know how to hunt you won't survive long without any protein.
My 9 year old daughter can field clean a deer. She's accurate with her bow out to 30 yards and a better riflle shot than some of the men at our deer camp. The best part is she actually enjoys it. Haven't started on the "survival" aspect but I will in time. I think it's just different here in the South. I know most people don't have these opportunities with their children. I've been blessed.
originally posted by: Reverbs
originally posted by: Anathros
originally posted by: Reverbs
a reply to: FHomerK
its funny the responses in this thread almost all of which miss the mark on what was said. Some are focusing on Graham Hancock. Some on Ancient civilizations. Some on survival.
No Our CULTURE has no way of surviving. Only stories would remain and in one generation your kids are hearing about buildings and ekectricity without ever turning on a light. "Back in my day we were magic." basically.. That won't translate well to ywo or three generations.
The gods will be long dead by then.. Some notion of a Golden Age will remain. Some will tell stories of gods.
Anyway, can you imagine being reincarnated and finding some piece of a car in the jungle and having dejavu.. Like "I know what this is its an engine block."
but having no clue how you know this now you are a shaman or something haha..
I'm saying a country boy will survive anything short of a nuclear holocaust. There's very few of us that panic when the lights go out. We may not all be the professor from Gilligan's Island but most of us will get by.
Down here, we raise our own chickens for eggs, we can hunt, and we keep a garden every year. Lights go out, I won't be watching football but living off the land pretty much is our culture.
you missed the point.
YOU are not culture..
you will live but trying to explain what the imternet was will be imposible.. How many books do you have?
basically this idea of a worldwide culture will be a myth.. you made it up and good for you, you can survive...
thats not the point.
in two generations your great grandkids wont know what roads are for. None of you will write on rocks.. All your paper will melt away. You remember ATS but your great great grandkids will think you are talking about magic.
I dont think you understand this topic.
its not if YOU survive.. Its CULTURE.. our current culture has billions of nodes.. Going from paying money to get on an airplane to surviving in the woods without other people.... It wont take long till you are drawing a vw bus in the dirt and no one has any clue what it means.
youll survive.. but our grand civilization is dead. Not long until you lose all machines.... another few hundred years and we are wearing animal skins..
You cant remember everything.
hence... Maybe we forgot the past.
originally posted by: Wolfenz
just curious Byrd ,
seeing from you have said :
how many Mass Extinctions that MODERN MAN Went Through and Survived ?
and you Lead me to believe Man did not Create an Advancement until the Last 10,000 years ?
Until 10,000 years ago! ? when Man had the first Written Communicative language ? close to 8,000+ years ago?
yet we have Beautiful Advance artwork in the Caves of France that is claimed to be 40,000 year Old
and a Figurine of a Half Lion Half Man that is also around 40,000 years old .. made from Ivory of a Mammoth ?
originally posted by: Jimjolnir
I know and see too many people that work from home, or don't work at all, with not even a potato in a garden box, let alone any sort of survival skills. The Huns would have a field day.
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: Wolfenz
just curious Byrd ,
seeing from you have said :
how many Mass Extinctions that MODERN MAN Went Through and Survived ?
So far, we're surviving the first one.
"Mass Extinction events" aren't a "something clobbers the entire earth" sort of thing. They take place over thousands to millions of years. The extinction of the non-avian dinosaurs actually happened before the big meteor strike. Ice Age extinction took place over thousands of years.
and you Lead me to believe Man did not Create an Advancement until the Last 10,000 years ?
Yep.
You need trade and technology and that means large populations. Your average hunter-gatherer doesn't have the time or the resources to create a functional light bulb and battery. Oh, the materials might be around, but they would first have to research candles and then lanterns and then voltaic piles and then wires and then insulators and then electrical circuits and then clear glass, etc. That's hard to do when your day is spent making weapons and chasing antelope and there's only 40 of you and one of those is your crazy old uncle Harry... and six of you are still toddlers.
Until 10,000 years ago! ? when Man had the first Written Communicative language ? close to 8,000+ years ago?
yet we have Beautiful Advance artwork in the Caves of France that is claimed to be 40,000 year Old
and a Figurine of a Half Lion Half Man that is also around 40,000 years old .. made from Ivory of a Mammoth ?
That's symbolic art with common materials. And I'm not dismissing that but societies were too small and too mobile to develop much technology (for really good metal work you need forges which develops from ovens ... and you don't get that with camp fires.)
(and that gizmodo article is badly written and poorly researched.)
Technology is persistent. Once we develop something (like the plow), the collapse of civilizations and the destruction of a lot of people (Black Death) doesn't mean we forgot that technology or that we had to work our way back up.
You need trade and technology and that means large populations. Your average hunter-gatherer doesn't have the time or the resources to create a functional light bulb and battery. Oh, the materials might be around, but they would first have to research candles and then lanterns and then voltaic piles and then wires and then insulators and then electrical circuits and then clear glass, etc. That's hard to do when your day is spent making weapons and chasing antelope and there's only 40 of you and one of those is your crazy old uncle Harry... and six of you are still toddlers.