Flat earth theory?

a reply to: neutronflux

In physics, an orbit is the gravitationally curved trajectory of an object,[1] such as the trajectory of a planet around a star or a natural satellite around a planet.

74!

You are unbelievable.

around a planet

A geostationary satellite doesnt go around the planet. Is this news in any way familiar to you?

a reply to: InfiniteTrinity

I think I understand what your argument really is here, for flat Earth validity.

What you're really saying is, your mama so fat, she confirm flat Earth theory.

a reply to: InfiniteTrinity

I gave it to you. What did you not understand/are unhappy with?

originally posted by: InfiniteTrinity
a reply to: neutronflux

In physics, an orbit is the gravitationally curved trajectory of an object,[1] such as the trajectory of a planet around a star or a natural satellite around a planet.

74!

You are unbelievable.

around a planet

A geostationary satellite doesnt go around the planet. Is this news in any way familiar to you?

It does go around the planet. Only that the planet turns with it.

It does go around the planet. Only that the planet turns with it.

originally posted by: InfiniteTrinity

It does go around the planet. Only that the planet turns with it.

a reply to: InfiniteTrinity

I gave it to you. What did you not understand/are unhappy with?

originally posted by: InfiniteTrinity
Sorry all your points have been refuted, agreed upon, or have nothing to do with any point I made. Told you 100 times now. Seriously doubting your cognitive abilities.

central mass

Can you define that.

You have refuted nothing , you cant just say its debunked because you think you are right and simply stating your own opinion isn't refuting anything !


I've repeatedly told you , provide evidence which shows that geostationary satellite doesnt orbit the earth

provide evidence which contradicts the theory of gravity

we wont hold our breath because you cant even debate a subject properly , you just give your opinion and put semantic spin on words .

As we have all said , just because you cant understand (personal incredulity) it doesn't make it any less real for the rest of humanity !

You are creating a circular loop of idiocy and you change the goal posts every time a member schools you .

a reply to: InfiniteTrinity

refute
/rɪˈfjuːt/
Learn to pronounce
verb
prove (a statement or theory) to be wrong or false; disprove.
"these claims have not been convincingly refuted"
synonyms: disprove, prove wrong/false, show/prove to be wrong/false, rebut, confute, give the lie to, demolish, explode, debunk, drive a coach and horses through, discredit, invalidate




Your opinion is not refuting orbital mechanics or gravitational field theory !

all it is doing is proving you are a fool

a reply to: InfiniteTrinity

I gave it to you several times now.
What did you not understand/are unhappy with?

a reply to: sapien82

I've repeatedly told you , provide evidence which shows that geostationary satellite doesnt orbit the earth

You guys really are special people to me.

Let me explain it to you. Lol.


To orbit the Earth, it has to move around the Earth.......

Did you know that a geostationary satellite doesnt move around the Earth?

a reply to: ManFromEurope

You gave the definition for center of mass.

originally posted by: InfiniteTrinity
a reply to: ManFromEurope

You gave the definition for center of mass.

You are argueing about the distinction between "center of mass" and "central mass"?
That is all what is left of your argument?

Why are you wasting your and our time with this?

a reply to: ManFromEurope

You are argueing about the distinction between "center of mass" and "central mass"?

I am not arguing. I asked a question for clarification. I didnt even ask you.

Why are you wasting your and our time with this?

Do I control you?

a reply to: InfiniteTrinity

that is where you are wrong a geostationary satellite does move around the earth , it just moves at the same speed that the earth is rotating, so it appears stationary to the observer

that is what you cant understand

but Like I said , " provide evidence that it doesnt move around the earth and then we can debate

but so far your just running your mouth and making you look like a fool


I posted to you before that you didnt get the concept of geostationary satellites

you refused to accept that because you couldnt understand it

originally posted by: InfiniteTrinity
a reply to: ManFromEurope

You are argueing about the distinction between "center of mass" and "central mass"?

I am not arguing. I asked a question for clarification. I didnt even ask you.

Why are you wasting your and our time with this?

Do I control you?

Thisis the first time I will say you are correct, you are correct you are not arguing at all , because to argue requires having a valid point and evidence to support your claim or back up your position , but you have nothing !

Nothing but your EGO

a reply to: sapien82

that is where you are wrong a geostationary satellite does move around the earth , it just moves at the same speed that the earth is rotating, so it appears stationary to the observer

So it is not moving around the Earth. It is moving through space. If it moved around the Earth it wouldnt appear stationary, would it, sapien82 ? This is getting embarrassing.

that is what you cant understand

a reply to: InfiniteTrinity

what part of movement dont you get ?

it is moving around earth at the same speed the earth rotates, and so because of this it appears stationary to the observer , however the satellite is still moving and therefore is considered still in orbit !

seriously mate your just acting like a fool

a reply to: sapien82

however the satellite is still moving and therefore is considered still in orbit !

You said it orbits the Earth. It doesnt. Changing the goal posts now are we.

what part of movement dont you get ?

You tell me. I didnt deny movement. Why is it impossible for you people to respond to what is actually said?