It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Jacksonsman1
Couple Questions though, Is it widely believed that the F-117 and the Companion were not developed together, but were later found to be complimentary? Or from the get-go it was flying alongside the f-117 during testing? Once they are retired, would they likely be put in to the same type of storage the f-117 is in out at TTR??
originally posted by: boomer135
a reply to: weavty1
I couldn't tell you if it was built at the very same time but within years of each other. [...]
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: BigTrain
[...] The companion was flying with the F-117 when it was still black.
originally posted by: boomer135
[...]Someone asked how I knew it was still flying this year and the answer is a boom from Edwards let me know that he refueled it as recently as January [2014].
Did the companion come out of one of these projects which had an initial aim of being something else but proved to be successful at other missions and eventually evolved in to the role it does now?
While looking in to these projects I stumbled across a site which mentions the Northrop Grumman AX17 which apparently is a fictional plane but mentions that it was based on the F23 but with swing wing. Certainly the F23 was a highly capable plane so does the companion share some of the DNA of the F23? It would certainly tick some of the boxes and I seem to recall mention of the F23 being considered for a bomber/ground attack role based on it's capabilities.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Barnalby
Very interesting thoughts.
Wrong, but very interesting.
Well on the shape it's wrong. Not bad on the rest.
originally posted by: Barnalby
a reply to: Zaphod58
So you're saying the companion was/is a stealth A2A/Wild Weasel/ECM craft NOT built by Lockheed, and there was a "missing link" between the Tacit Blue and the YF-23, but they weren't the same aircraft?
Maybe it *was* a Boeing-built evolution of the Quiet Bird
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Barnalby
I have said what I said and that's what I said.
originally posted by: boomer135
Lets think about this. Most people will agree that the YF-23 whipped the crap out of the YF-22 in just about every aspect of the competition, with a few exceptions. Now why would the YF-22 get picked for the contract over the -23? Perhaps the YF-23 went blackworld as either a RF-23 or FB-23, or even taken a step further and made into a sixth gen fighter to replace legacy fighters in a decade or two.
The two most people talk about are the grey one and the black one. I was given the opportunity to refuel the black one once, and mind you this was after the competition was already over and the F-22 was in production. Sooooo why were they still flying it? I'll let ya in on a little secret...there's more than just two of them built....
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Blackfinger
Not necessarily. Best way to hide it is put it under somewhere you wouldn't look. There is a reason the F-117 got a fighter designation.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: spaceman42
Interesting tidbit, the Air Force quietly redesigned the B-2A into the B-2B.
originally posted by: spaceman42
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Blackfinger
Not necessarily. Best way to hide it is put it under somewhere you wouldn't look. There is a reason the F-117 got a fighter designation.
Because both the F-117 and the companion were build close together timewise, it would be logical to assume the companion also got a 'F' designation. My best guess would be F-119 if it was named later or F-115 if it was named earlier. If they were really sneaky they could just as well have called it the F-117E and probably most would have considered it a typo
originally posted by: B2StealthBomber
a reply to: Forensick
The companion is very real, it's also not called the f-19, it follows the f-117 in its designation but not the fighter part.
originally posted by: EBJet
It also wasn't designed and built specifically to compliment the F-117 initially, so look to that for clues as to it's designation..
originally posted by: EBJet
It also wasn't designed and built specifically to compliment the F-117 initially, so look to that for clues as to it's designation..
originally posted by: spaceman42
originally posted by: EBJet
It also wasn't designed and built specifically to compliment the F-117 initially, so look to that for clues as to it's designation..
Well, then it might very well be an RF designation. A stealth/night follow-up to the RF-4C or something like that.
originally posted by: clay2 baraka
originally posted by: boomer135
a reply to: Stealthbomber
Zaph knows it. Lol. You do too, although I can't say how.....
So it's a TR-3 type craft with a different designation, likely evolved from the Sneaky Pete demonstrator..
So, let's call it an RF-2 Manta..
originally posted by: boomer135
a reply to: clay2 baraka
Not even close. Lol