The "Atlantean" Pyramid Cover-Up Exposed

a reply to: Byrd

Maybe the OP will show up and explain why a fictional movie with no research and a Youtube video somehow equal evidence... and what it's evidence for? I haven't figured out why Atlantis is in there yet.

You could have just said, nothing to see here folks ,move along and left it at that . How many of the pictures linked to in the movie are fictional ? Those were taken back in 1955 or earlier sketches from researchers . How about the Google earth images in the vid ...are they fictional too ? How about this wiki entry is it fiction too

Gaston Maspero, then director-general of the Supreme Council of Antiquities of Egypt, visited Barsanti's excavations and was struck by the monumental size of the construction. He writes:[4] “ ... I hope that the best informed amongst the tourists will come to admire the monument: the pleasure they will experience during this trip is worth the two or three hours it will take. At first, the immensity of the task undertaken by the Egyptians will not appear to them, it is only at the bottom of the stairway, when they will walk upon the granite pavement that it will become obvious. It is not that anything in particular when examined in details is remarkable or out of the ordinary, but the general feeling is one of those one never forgets. The size and richness of the materials, the perfection of the cuts and joints, the peerless finish of the granit sarcophagus, the boldness of structure and the sheer height of the walls, everything comes together to compose this so far unique ensemble. It is an awe inspiring shock and nowhere is the power and mastery of the old Egyptian architects so suddenly and strongly obvious as here.

en.wikipedia.org...

Or how about this quote about what this is about ...from the wiki entry

Since 1964 the pyramid of Baka lies within a military restricted area. Consequently, no excavations are allowed, the necropolis surrounding the pyramid is overbuilt with military bungalows and the shaft is misused as a local dump. Thus, the status of the burial shaft is now uncertain and most likely disastrous

Maybe its nothing ,maybe its something ...maybe you should just move along seeing you have already pointed out the fictitious nature of the op and lack of scholarly input ... Maybe you could or should make a thread about what we should look at and how we should look at it pertaining to the site. You do have your papers correct ?

a reply to: the2ofusr1

Where you aware there is actually two pyramids there? The unfinished pyramid you seem so fascinated with wasn't building it was digging into acreation layers. They dug and then lined passages with filspar and morter. It by no means some hidden technology in fact just the opisit it was ditches dug into rock.

It wasn't complicated it's only practicality was to give us an idea of how pyramid construction started. The reason it became a military base us because of the movie. They built fences and the army protected the area during filming. This led to barracks being built to support the military. After the movie left the army decided to keep using the area since they had to build support services in the area. Without the movie this wouldn't be a base at all.

a reply to: dragonridr

There is a lot about it I have not heard or know . Using it for a dump seems a bit much though .What do we know about other restricted areas ? There is a theme that emerges from this type of suppression much like

originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: dragonridr

There is a lot about it I have not heard or know . Using it for a dump seems a bit much though .What do we know about other restricted areas ? There is a theme that emerges from this type of suppression much like

Did it ever occur to you that you believe because you want to. Seeing this video posted shows me your concerned with a narrative and not the facts. Here since you like videos watch this.

originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: the2ofusr1

Where you aware there is actually two pyramids there? The unfinished pyramid you seem so fascinated with wasn't building it was digging into acreation layers. They dug and then lined passages with filspar and morter. It by no means some hidden technology in fact just the opisit it was ditches dug into rock.

It wasn't complicated it's only practicality was to give us an idea of how pyramid construction started. The reason it became a military base us because of the movie. They built fences and the army protected the area during filming. This led to barracks being built to support the military. After the movie left the army decided to keep using the area since they had to build support services in the area. Without the movie this wouldn't be a base at all.

The unfinished pyramid WE all seem so fascinated with.

Has it occured to you the Movie which by proxy is a part TPTB Global Entertainment arm of the Cabal was a smokescreen facade to slip a suppressive military base over an area holding ruins critical to experiencing our true history....as a part of a much bigger anti-humanitarian terrorist global Cabal coverup effort.......an effort which in todays world cannot be questioned or brought into dispute...intelligently.

a reply to: dragonridr

You believe you are qualified to parse the narrative seperately from the facts.

The proxy definition of "facts" you use is a peer approval based status quo driven manipulated perspective shared by many...and it is the non-status quo driven narrative which will bring us closer to the truth ....your "facts" will inevitably change as your status quo perspective is disenfranchised more and more by real-time online volume data driven narratives which ask and answer questions the Cabals Publishing house driven peer approval status quo perspective will skirt...and suppress...and artificially disenfranchise.

originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: dragonridr

There is a lot about it I have not heard or know . Using it for a dump seems a bit much though .What do we know about other restricted areas ? There is a theme that emerges from this type of suppression much like

Thank you for the video....I had already put that site on my cerebral rolodex marked with a red-flag having recognised the directed suppression.Its nice to see others digging deeper and pushing for disclosure all around us every day.

originally posted by: one4all
a reply to: dragonridr

You believe you are qualified to parse the narrative seperately from the facts.

The proxy definition of "facts" you use is a peer approval based status quo driven manipulated perspective shared by many...and it is the non-status quo driven narrative which will bring us closer to the truth ....your "facts" will inevitably change as your status quo perspective is disenfranchised more and more by real-time online volume data driven narratives which ask and answer questions the Cabals Publishing house driven peer approval status quo perspective will skirt...and suppress...and artificially disenfranchise.

Wow you used a lot of words just to day you choose to ignore facts. Facts don't change what does is people's interpretation of them. If you filter everything with the idea that some cabal is manipulating everything you will find ways to prove your asumption correct even if it means ignoring the facts.

As my quote says the truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is.

very confused and confusing thread..the guy in the original video (on the first page) is obviously a strong believer in strange conspiracy theories.

a reply to: dragonridr

93-77......16 more words than you used.

"Wow you used a lot of words just to say you choose to ignore facts.".....bam ......you are outta there disinfo Cowboy.

Evidence has been provided outlining why your facts are not only skewed they are by proxy flawed manipulated and missive.I see no rebuttal.

Ok you will percieve so you may endure malice and derision to defend your perspective.....just like the rest of us.

originally posted by: anti72
very confused and confusing thread..the guy in the original video (on the first page) is obviously a strong believer in strange conspiracy theories.

Its ok to be confused when you are engaged in the learning process you know ...right?.....it means everything is going tickety-boo......IMHO the OP is a strong believer in DISCOVERING and DISCLOSING the TRUTH of the many acts of global suppression forced upon us which hide Humanities One True History from all of us....the same modus oprandi is evidenced over and over and this is a fine example which fits the bill....IMHO the guy in the original video[on the first page] is curious .

a reply to: anti72

I found this video to be enlightening and maybe you will to,it is illustrative of the suppression of a ancient sites similar to the one discussed in this thread.

IMHO it is absolutely a Global Cabal conspiracy to suppress and confuse our One True Humanitarian History.

www.youtube.com...

I see no real reason 'believing' in such a conspiracy BS that pops up on YT.
I have no problem with 'enlightenment' though.
The video guy seems to base his ideas on stange fringe sites without an real archeological research.
I dont like twisting or ignoring scientific facts.

the guy has to come up with evidence of:
- 'conspiracy' coverup about archeological site
- ' Atlantis' connection

a reply to: LABTECH767

This one was interesting, one i don't recall having seen before. I took a look at another video by this guy and was intrigued by his knowledge of not only archaeology, but carbon dating and other things, many 'rock' specialists seem to toss aside. Thanks for the video post LABTECH

a reply to: dragonridr

Did it ever occur to you that you believe because you want to. Seeing this video posted shows me your concerned with a narrative and not the facts. Here since you like videos watch this.

Here is a fact for you .Mount Sinai according to the New Testament is in Arabia not in Egypt . The vid I showed shows a place in Arabia with a fence and keep out warnings . But if you want to take the tourist tour then you go to Egypt where they have a Mount Sinai too and one where you can buy all the tokens to bring home ...That is a fact

originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: dragonridr

Did it ever occur to you that you believe because you want to. Seeing this video posted shows me your concerned with a narrative and not the facts. Here since you like videos watch this.

Here is a fact for you .Mount Sinai according to the New Testament is in Arabia not in Egypt . The vid I showed shows a place in Arabia with a fence and keep out warnings . But if you want to take the tourist tour then you go to Egypt where they have a Mount Sinai too and one where you can buy all the tokens to bring home ...That is a fact

Just watch the video I posted it explains how those amatuers miss identified everything at the site because they know nothing about geography of history. By the way speaking of history you do know the sainai peninsula was part if Saudi Arabia dont you. You learn that in history you can't use modern maps things change.

a reply to: the2ofusr1

Regardless of the debate as to the actual location of Mount Sinai, the political regions back then were much different than they are today. The Egyptian empire encompassed parts of the Middle East as we tend to call it now, but then came the Romans and Ottomans to change the political climate. There may have been times when references to the region of Arabia as a whole would have included the Sinai Peninsula as far as Egypt proper. In other words, an Arab could be from anywhere between the Suez to the west, the Euphrates to the north-east and the Tigris to the south-east, much farther either way and we’d probably be referring to Africans or Asians. So what I’m saying is that if somebody were to have said 3,000 years ago that Mount Sinai is in Arabia, then it could have been on either the Sinai or Arabian peninsula. In any case, I think the biggest clue here is in the name; why call it Mount Sinai if it’s not actually on the smaller peninsula itself?

a reply to: VigiliaProcuratio

Alot of people here want to believe something so bad that any evidence feeds their dulusion. For example what they appear to not under stand is Saudi Arabia is a member of ICOMOS, the International Council of Monuments and Sites. This is an “international non-governmental organization of professionals, dedicated to the conservation of [the] world’s historic monuments and sites.

Do you know what being a member requires you to do? Simple preserve these sites put up fences to prevent thief's and scavengers and oh yeah post the sign they have stating it's an archeological site and keep out. Now according to their agreement if your an archeologist your welcome to visit and do research as long as you done damage the site. Shocker real archeologists have been to the area and even wrote papers. But alas that's just contradictory to a made up scenario of archeological repression.

Look at the original thread I had to tell them their was two pyramids at that location. And basically the unfinished pyramid wasn't much more than a quarry since all they did was dig into accretion layers. They were in the process of digging in to a small mountain. From an archeological standpoint the only thing enlightening is it proves the theory that pyramids tended to be located on hills makes it easier by using less material.

a reply to: dragonridr

you do know the sainai peninsula was part if Saudi Arabia dont you.

Yes on maps of today but not back then . Even Josephus says its in Arabia .

a reply to: dragonridr

For example what they appear to not under stand is Saudi Arabia is a member of ICOMOS, the International Council of Monuments and Sites. This is an “international non-governmental organization of professionals, dedicated to the conservation of [the] world’s historic monuments and sites
[/quote Which could apply to the op and that site being used as a dump and locked away from the public .