It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: Stevenjames15
a reply to: network dude
Intent, intent, intent. IT DOES NOT matter if they got any damning information or not. The intent was that they were excited to receive damning information from a hostile foreign power. Using your logic, if someone intended on robbing someone and were not successful. Would that person not be charged with a crime?
Ah yes, the "intent" angle. Just like you have to have intent to be charged, now you can be charged on intent alone.
You lefties sure do have a strange interpretation of the law.
Luckily, the laws are not for you to interpret, they are written plain enough that anyone thinking clearly can see that none of them were broken in that instance. A political campaign was offered dirt on their rival. It's a lot like if an ex-MI6 agent compiled a list of bad things against someone's opponent then offered to sell it to them. let me know when McCain and the DNC are arrested sport.
Yes, the law is pretty easy to read when it comes to this issue. It has been pointed out that there does not need to be any exchange for the law to be broken. There only need to be a promise to receive such materials.
A foreign national shall not, directly or indirectly, make a contribution or a donation of money or other thing of value, or expressly or impliedly promise to make a contribution or a donation, in connection with any Federal, State, or local election.
Of course, you know this. You've been told many times and you still just can't seem to grasp it.
So if Trump Jr. "intended" to pay for any juicy information, this would not be an issue? How is it that you know he didn't intend to pay for something, but was given nothing?
I don't think you thought this through.
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: Stevenjames15
I've read the emails....
thanks though...
no, the emails only tells what the russian are offering, not what they expect in return.
trump jr gave us a clue at to that when he said the meeting was about russian adoptions,.... code for magnitsky act..
it sounds to me what was being said was we will help you win by providing all this negative information concerning hillary if you will remove those sanctions for us...
then we can both profit through you trump towers laundromat.
newrepublic.com...
originally posted by: Martin75
a reply to: FauxMulder
It's a witch hunt and they are out for blood.
originally posted by: GuidedKill
...a raid proves nothing....only adds to the speculation from members here on ATS...
Let it run it's course...
originally posted by: ChrisM101
But what we did have was FUSION GPS working with a ex MI6 agent to provide fake details of Trump Pissing on a hotel bed in Russia That Obama slept in, and supposedly enjoying two prostitutes... All fake of course.
Senate Approves Russia Sanctions, Limiting Trump's Oversight A new bipartisan deal prohibits the president from rolling back sanctions without Congress’s approval.
originally posted by: olaru12
I think I mentioned that Manafort would spill his guts to save his own skin. Just a matter of time.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust
Moving into the second inning you mean.