It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: carewemust
fair is not forcing someone to buy insurance or be penalized.
before obumacare no where in the Constitution does it say that the federal government can force a person to purchase any thing from a corporation or company.
what about car insurance?
originally posted by: toysforadults
why don't we ask ourselves what cost so damn much rather than trying to figure out if we are paying to much or not
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: WUNK22
Do you think it was a mistake that bush left negotiations out of the medicare prescription drug coverage? It is a cash cow that is lobbied for. In fact medical is the #1 lobbied measured by real dollars.
Seasonal, you raise an interesting point that I've never contemplated. How does it benefit the government to pay more for Senior's prescription drugs? You're hinting that the ability for drug-price negotiations for Medicare Part-D (Prescriptions) was omitted for a reason.
originally posted by: seasonal
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: WUNK22
Do you think it was a mistake that bush left negotiations out of the medicare prescription drug coverage? It is a cash cow that is lobbied for. In fact medical is the #1 lobbied measured by real dollars.
Seasonal, you raise an interesting point that I've never contemplated. How does it benefit the government to pay more for Senior's prescription drugs? You're hinting that the ability for drug-price negotiations for Medicare Part-D (Prescriptions) was omitted for a reason.
I believe in my little heart of hearts that Bush was (is) part of the problem.
If our medical system was our internet service we would have fired them and went with a different company. Can't do that with medical-ever wonder why?
originally posted by: leolady
a reply to: carewemust
If a families monthly medical premium is $283/mo, they are already paying out $3,396 per year, should that not cover their regular routing doctor visits with no extra charges ?
If each individual's deductible is $5,700 on top of that, they are likely never going to be covered by the insurance plan if they are generally healthy and only need to goto the doctor for routine visits and occasional illnesses that come up through out the year. If a generally healthy individual goes to the doctor in this situation, they have been paying their monthly premium of $283.00 and when they goto the doctor insurance doesn't cover them, they get slapped with a bill for $100 to $200 on top of their mo premium and on top of a copay paid at time of doctor visit each time they goto the doctor. This is not affordable for avg/below avg folks. They are only going to get coverage if they get really sick and suddenly have bills that max $2396 + $5700 ...what is the likelihood of that ? If one individual in the family gets really "sick", they have to pay out $8,096 before anything is covered.
Why is it that the monthly premium doesn't get used to help pay for bills ? The money goes into the insurance system but there is zero value in it for the patient. It's just going into the abyss as soon as its paid out, it appears that it has no value at all in any way for the patient. I think $283.00 is plenty to cover one regular simple doctor visit...why on top of that does their have to be new bills and because a "deductible" has not been met the patient still has to pay money out of pocket.
The deductible should go back down to $100 to $200 for only certain types of services or nothing at all...the monthly premium should cover them and the insurance needs to do what it was intended to do, cover individual/family. Otherwise its becomes a money pit where we place a high percentage of our income but never get anything back from it.
leolady