It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: markovian
Only uranium in mine ... no worries tho we are only at the maximum safe levels and i fully trust them when they say that its safe to drink ... its not like in 2014 when they where cought with several over level contaminates ... and they would never lie again
The amount of downplay on the uranium is unreal its within safe levels ... with 0 room left ... i dont think i quite belive there is a safe amount of uranium
originally posted by: TiredofControlFreaks
a reply to: Mandroid7
You mean "toxic" like the water that we drank before chlorination??
You mean 'toxic" like the water that caused diptheria and polio and killed children by the thousands? Is that the "toxic" you mean?
I have conducted more TDS tests than you can imagine. TDS testing is conducted to ensure that the dissolved solids in a water supply are sufficiently low so that the particulate does not interfere with complete disinfection.
I know, I kind of love a good scare story now and again myself. However it would be foolish not to do a little research in assessing these risks or claims of such.
Man - ATS loves the scare stories!
I like the environmental adage, "Dilution is the solution". It would scare just about anyone if they knew the amount of contaminants in our water ways and estuaries.
Just because a chemical is harmful in the parts per thousand range (mg/L) or even in the parts per billion (ng/L) range, does not mean it is harmful in the parts per trillion range. The poison is in the dose.
A good scientist never deals in absolutes, negligible risk maybe but never zero.
Every thing and I do mean EVERY THING has health risks. So the health risk is NEVER zero!
I don't think TiredofControlFreaks is claiming zero ppm. I believe you are off by 1-2 orders of magnitude.
originally posted by: Mandroid7
a reply to: TiredofControlFreaks
Drinking 0ppm water is not going to have the deficiency effect you claim.
Only if you live in Flint MI.
originally posted by: Mandroid7
Tap water is toxic.
originally posted by: TheLeadI've also heard that estrogen from tampons flushed down the toilet can never be filtered out of the water, which in these days seems to pretty evident in our daily lives.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
originally posted by: TheLead
I only drink spring water, probably not much better but nature is the best filter imo.
"Spring Water" = Bottled Tap Water (in cheap plastic to make it the worst POS "water" you can drink).
I always cringe when you see people with cases of "Spring Water" on their carts at the grocery store.
originally posted by: Justso
Where to go-who to trust?
At least the the water in Mn tasted and smelled the best I have ever had and they drew directly from the aquifer-no need for smelly water plants.
This is a really serious problem.
originally posted by: TheLead
You mean bottled from the source, untouched by man is just an advertising slogan, lol /sarc
I understand that but as I stated I "know" of the contamination in my local source. The spring around here are full of Lyme and sulphur. I'm told the Lyme makes for a good bourbon, but I don't often partake.
I would love to be able to set up a stainless system filtered by uv and charcoal it just isn't financially feasible at this moment.
If ignorance is bliss I guess I'm saved by the bel-ding.
originally posted by: MysticPearl
When I visit family in Bulgaria, my mother in law goes and gets huge jugs of actual, 100% natural spring water. No chemicals, no pharma runoff, no fluoride in it.
Within about three weeks like clockwork, on every trip, my brain feels much clearer, skin looks better and I lose weight.