Bizarre Bipedal Creature Captured in Azerbaijan?

I originally spotted this on the coast to coast website and followed the article back to the Cryptomundo.com website

An video has surfaced allegedly showing a strange, small bipedal creature with a hairless face and which later in the video, can be seen walking around a room on a leash.

The creatures hands are visible, showing black fingernails and if you look carefully, slight webbing can be seen between the digits.

Speculation grows, with some viewers claiming it could be a monkey in a suit, whilst others suggest it could be a captured Baby Bigfoot.

The hair on the creature does seem a little overgrown to say the least but I thought ATS may find this interesting.

Igor Burtsev of the International Center of Hominology, brought this video to our attention and had this to say: It presented on Utube as a captured small hairy creature on the Caucases but not exactly where. Somebody wrote that in Karachaevo-Cherkes republic? but as I could understand they were talking in Azerbaijan language (now it’s a separate state by the Kaspian sea)/ And I noticed there on a piece of paper Arabic and Latin letters show the date – November 30, 2016, or еhe year 1395 Hijri (?)and the name Haji Taha – in Russia they don’t use such writings, it’s another confirmation of Azerbaijan location of the case (my personal investigation, as I know Azerbaijan language and Arabic writings too). The Arabic writings show some figures – 75,11,95, 25 – and a couple of letters Baby Bigfoot? Juvenile Almasty? Monkey in a suit? What do you think?

Coast to coast link

Cryptomundo link

Awesome video!

I say monkey in a suit. Or minkey in a suit. One of the two.

My Initial thoughts

I find the structure of the nose to be quite strange as the nostrils don't appear anchored to the side of the face.

I have looked at a large number of monkey images and can't find any obvious similarity.

Some cryptozoology enthusiasts suggest that the creature in the footage is a young Almasty or baby Bigfoot but I have no idea if Bigfoot is alleged to have part webbed fingers, which in this case appear quite large compared to the size of the creature.

a reply to: and14263

Yes, I can see why you would think that and a lot of people seem to think so too.

The animal does make a strange sound when walking around the room later in the video.

originally posted by: and14263
Awesome video!

I say monkey in a suit. Or minkey in a suit. One of the two.

whats a minkey?

its tame whatever it is. Wild animals dont sit and pose for the cameras and that fur looks like a wig

It's from inner earth.

I reckon it's a monkey. Probably one that has been shaved. It's odd that the film-makers haven't provided a decent close-up of its face, which is the most important part in determining what it is. What clinches it for me is the hands, which are completely hairless, including the wrists, and just seem to be protruding from some kind of 'coat'. For the life of me, I cannot see how this is compatible with a creature that is clearly meant to have some kind of thick coat to protect it against the cold, since the hands would be so vulnerable to frostbite.

a reply to: Kalixi

Agreed, the fur just doesn't look right to me, a bit too shiny, like a Nylon wig.

But the face, especially the lips and the eyes. I think it's safe to say it's an animal yes but is it an animal that's been made to look like an oddity?

Apparently Dr Burtsev is the Director of the International Centre of Hominology in Moscow.



The webbing between the fingers.

Here's another 2013 link from an unrelated Yeti article from 2013, claimed to be real footage that some Bigfoot fans are probably aware of.

Huff Post

a reply to: studio500

The hands look like they weren't part of the creature, you never see the arms and it looks to me like the hands were coming in from the side and not actually part of the animal. Also was it wearing shoes or socks? It looks like socks on it's feet. I think monkey in a hair costume

a reply to: studio500

I am pretty sure it's ET but with a full head of hair now.

a reply to: studio500

i want 5 minuites of my life back

that was pretty much textbook " how not to film an alledged creature "

so many indicators of fakery that - it CBA any more

originally posted by: norhoc
a reply to: studio500

The hands look like they weren't part of the creature, you never see the arms and it looks to me like the hands were coming in from the side and not actually part of the animal. Also was it wearing shoes or socks? It looks like socks on it's feet. I think monkey in a hair costume

Yes, those blue socks are quite fetching aren't they.
The hand does indeed look large in comparison to the body but when the man holds the creature's hand, the hands do look quite small.

a reply to: studio500

Looks like some hoaxy malarkey with a spider monkey having a cheap wig attached to it. Whatever the case, it looks like the animal needs a better owner who doesn't keep it in a small flat on a string.

Where do Russians and East Europeans buy their tracksuits? They always look like stuff that was thrown out in the early 1980s. Not the good stuff either. Is someone still making these old designs or did Soviet Russia confiscate tons of 80s clothing and put them back on the market?

a reply to: Kandinsky

They were a gift from the ET's after dropping off a specimen for the use in the movie by Spielberg.

I don't know how these Russians got their hands on it but maybe they are part of the secret space program or maybe they are from inner earth as well.

I am undecided.

Your opinion could be what sways me.

a reply to: toysforadults

A lot of Eastern Europeans live locally and must be importing the classy tracksuits because nobody sells them here. Rolled up sleeves too.

I don't know how these Russians got their hands on it but maybe they are part of the secret space program or maybe they are from inner earth as well.

There's that too. Little alien lands on Earth and ends up a prisoner in some bloke's flat. Sounds like you've got the next script for PIXAR.

a reply to: studio500
To me its eyes look very much like a monkey's, but it blinks awkwardly, as if drugged. Its hands looked particularly fake to me too, but maybe they didn't move because of drugs as well...

When it walked it seemed off, as if it wasnt used to walking bipedally. My guess is monkey in a suit too

The lips look too big almost like when someone sticks eyes to their chin.

This is the closest image I can find of a monkey with big lips and what look like dark fingernails on long fingers.

Sadly, the image doesn't say what type of monkey this is.

Although as stated before, I can't find any monkey image with nostrils like those shown in the video.



I must say that the fur on this animal just doesn't look real at all but it also makes me wonder why Dr Burtsev would put his name to this.
Perhaps, another case of wishful thinking.

Also, why write notes on paper and show it to the camera when the video is clearly recording sound?
The 240p video output doesn't help either, it's probably been filmed with a device as old as the tracksuits.