It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx
Every freedom is important. Picking and choosing is where we get into trouble.
originally posted by: caf1550
a reply to: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx
Explain to me how you are having your freedoms taken away for not wearing it, are you loosing your 1st or 2nd amendment right for not wearing a seatbelt, in most states its a $10 fine if you can't afford that you have some bigger problems to deal with, as I have stated I could care less if you wear it or not, its your own decision but just be prepared to answer for it when and if you get stopped.
Going to the OP, the officer was in every right to stop the motorist for not wearing it, it was the motorist fault for what happened next, all he had to do was answer the officers questions and he probably would have been on his way with or without a ticket, but like I stated before im guessing he has had run ins with law enforcement before and had a tick on his shoulder about them.
originally posted by: caf1550
a reply to: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx
No I read what you wrote and like I said, what freedoms are you being deprived of by this happening, the answer is nothing none of your freedoms are being destroyed by being stopped for this.
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx
There is no way to measure or weight a freedom. Every freedom is important. Forcing someone to do anything that is for their own good is a very perilous reason to make law.
I agree it is a small issue, but it is very important to keep the govt out of out personal freedoms and be vigilant for over reaching laws and penalties. This has been an overreach.
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx
It is also safer to wear a helmet and a belt in a car. But I would wager that would be considered a violation of freedoms.
I agree it is silly. But the silliness is forcing a free person to wear a belt. I always air on the side of freedom.
Do you?
originally posted by: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx
It is also safer to wear a helmet and a belt in a car. But I would wager that would be considered a violation of freedoms.
I agree it is silly. But the silliness is forcing a free person to wear a belt. I always air on the side of freedom.
Do you?
What freedom is taken from you wearing a seatbelt?
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx
The right not to wear it.
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx
It is also safer to wear a helmet and a belt in a car. But I would wager that would be considered a violation of freedoms.
I agree it is silly. But the silliness is forcing a free person to wear a belt. I always air on the side of freedom.
Do you?
What freedom is taken from you wearing a seatbelt?
Freedom of choice