Number of children being referred to gender identity clinics has quadrupled in five years

originally posted by: veracity

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: MysticPearl

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: MysticPearl

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: elementalgrove
a reply to: Deaf Alien

I do not have an example ATM, I am unplugged from television so I do not know what is currently out there, but if you acknowledge that the sexualization of children through entertainment such as Disney has been unchanged since the 80's, why do you find it so hard to believe that they will be doing the same with gender dysphoria?

Gender and Sexuality are totally different subjects.

Nah, if you have a pecker you're a dude, if you don't you're a female.

What goes on in peoples heads constantly changes and is impacted heavily by influence and environment.

A simplistic argument against gender dysphoria.

Simplistic yet accurate.

No need to complicate nature.

exactly. there are only two genders in the animal kingdom. dogs, rabbits, kangaroos, cows, chickens, frogs...all have two genders. no more no less. but suddenly people feel like they are born in the wrong body, like the traditional system is too rigid and claustrophobic. some want to be the opposite, some feel like they are both, and some prefer no gender at all.

just look at that chart. genders are a spectrum now. there are more identities than colors in the rainbow. taking it just one step further, i dont see why people have to be public about it. since when have genders been relevant to the degree that we need new pronouns or have to abolish the standard ones? last i checked its sexist to identify someone based on their gender and stereotype them according to the presumed qualifications of that identity. and now we have to assume that someone is uncomfortable with not being acknowledged openly and loudly based on their identity, to the point that saying "sir" instead of "mx" is considered politically incorrect. i am just gonna call everyone "mortal" from now on. its fun and technically accurate. see how people like that.

Ive never seen this chart before, if you dont like this chart, dont look at it, geesh

Just bc you are ignorant of the subject doesnt make you the trans police

never said i was any kind of authority, be it knowledge or enforcement. i am sharing my observations because it appears my opinion is not an unpopular one based on previous responses. and yes i will post that graphic when relevant because it is informative.

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: veracity

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: MysticPearl

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: MysticPearl

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: elementalgrove
a reply to: Deaf Alien

I do not have an example ATM, I am unplugged from television so I do not know what is currently out there, but if you acknowledge that the sexualization of children through entertainment such as Disney has been unchanged since the 80's, why do you find it so hard to believe that they will be doing the same with gender dysphoria?

Gender and Sexuality are totally different subjects.

Nah, if you have a pecker you're a dude, if you don't you're a female.

What goes on in peoples heads constantly changes and is impacted heavily by influence and environment.

A simplistic argument against gender dysphoria.

Simplistic yet accurate.

No need to complicate nature.

exactly. there are only two genders in the animal kingdom. dogs, rabbits, kangaroos, cows, chickens, frogs...all have two genders. no more no less. but suddenly people feel like they are born in the wrong body, like the traditional system is too rigid and claustrophobic. some want to be the opposite, some feel like they are both, and some prefer no gender at all.

just look at that chart. genders are a spectrum now. there are more identities than colors in the rainbow. taking it just one step further, i dont see why people have to be public about it. since when have genders been relevant to the degree that we need new pronouns or have to abolish the standard ones? last i checked its sexist to identify someone based on their gender and stereotype them according to the presumed qualifications of that identity. and now we have to assume that someone is uncomfortable with not being acknowledged openly and loudly based on their identity, to the point that saying "sir" instead of "mx" is considered politically incorrect. i am just gonna call everyone "mortal" from now on. its fun and technically accurate. see how people like that.

Ive never seen this chart before, if you dont like this chart, dont look at it. Especially dont post it on a forum board, geesh

People always love to put up that chart as if it proves something.

the same can be said of bible verses, twitter posts and political blogs, mortal.

originally posted by: MysticPearl

originally posted by: veracity

originally posted by: MysticPearl

originally posted by: veracity

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: elementalgrove

It would make more sense to increase the population of gay people for population control.

And isn't transhumanism a good thing? I admit I don't read much about it but from what I understand it means using science and technology to increase the human intelligence and psychology. Basically improving human beings.

on the other side or (please dont freak out too much religious people) in heaven, the more advanced souls are genderless.

Source?

Youre on a forum board, you have internet, google search "genderless souls"

Is google in touch with the after life?

seriously?

You have to expand your mind for this one, i dont expect it from many people on this board.

a reply to: TzarChasm

How is it informative? This thread is about transgender children. They are so rare as it is. Bringing up the silly chart about silly various genders is not going to help add anything to this thread.

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: TzarChasm

How is it informative? This thread is about transgender children. They are so rare as it is. Bringing up the silly chart about silly various genders is not going to help add anything to this thread.

it illustrates a trend which reflects the subject of the op.

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: TzarChasm

How is it informative? This thread is about transgender children. They are so rare as it is. Bringing up the silly chart about silly various genders is not going to help add anything to this thread.

Its doesnt help anything or anyone even not on this thread. You are not teaching anything helpful. You are just trying to complicate the subject. Just miserable.

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: TzarChasm

How is it informative? This thread is about transgender children. They are so rare as it is. Bringing up the silly chart about silly various genders is not going to help add anything to this thread.

it illustrates a trend which reflects the subject of the op.

>1% of the population is not a trend.

a reply to: TzarChasm

There's this stupid idea floating around that if you're a boy and prefer female things and/or think like a girl, it means you're a girl trapped in a boys body rather than just a boy who leans feminine.

It's actually sexist by nature. It suggests if you feel or think a certain way you're either a boy or a girl. It suggests it's somehow unnatural to feel and think a certain way so you must be a different gender. It's insane.

The only reason a boy would think he's a girl and is trapped inside a boys body is because society has told him his thoughts and feelings are what girls have and think. How else would someone feel that way? A boy is supposed to feel like he's missing a uterus? That he doesn't feel right missing his period every month? That he prefers softball to baseball? That he likes dresses and makeup? Then put on a dress and makeup, you're simply a boy who then likes dresses and makeup just like a woman who likes to wear suits isn't a man trapped in a woman's body.

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: MysticPearl

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: MysticPearl

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: elementalgrove
a reply to: Deaf Alien

I do not have an example ATM, I am unplugged from television so I do not know what is currently out there, but if you acknowledge that the sexualization of children through entertainment such as Disney has been unchanged since the 80's, why do you find it so hard to believe that they will be doing the same with gender dysphoria?

Gender and Sexuality are totally different subjects.

Nah, if you have a pecker you're a dude, if you don't you're a female.

What goes on in peoples heads constantly changes and is impacted heavily by influence and environment.

A simplistic argument against gender dysphoria.

Simplistic yet accurate.

No need to complicate nature.

exactly. there are only two genders in the animal kingdom. dogs, rabbits, kangaroos, cows, chickens, frogs...all have two genders. no more no less. but suddenly people feel like they are born in the wrong body, like the traditional system is too rigid and claustrophobic. some want to be the opposite, some feel like they are both, and some prefer no gender at all.

just look at that chart. genders are a spectrum now. there are more identities than colors in the rainbow. taking it just one step further, i dont see why people have to be public about it. since when have genders been relevant to the degree that we need new pronouns or have to abolish the standard ones? last i checked its sexist to identify someone based on their gender and stereotype them according to the presumed qualifications of that identity. and now we have to assume that someone is uncomfortable with not being acknowledged openly and loudly based on their identity, to the point that saying "sir" instead of "mx" is considered politically incorrect. i am just gonna call everyone "mortal" from now on. its fun and technically accurate. see how people like that.

OMG, this chart is not even real, its made up by miserable bigots like yourself. No one likes to be called butch or any of those terms. Demiboy...seriously. You people are just ...cardboard.

originally posted by: veracity

originally posted by: MysticPearl

originally posted by: veracity

originally posted by: MysticPearl

originally posted by: veracity

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: elementalgrove

It would make more sense to increase the population of gay people for population control.

And isn't transhumanism a good thing? I admit I don't read much about it but from what I understand it means using science and technology to increase the human intelligence and psychology. Basically improving human beings.

on the other side or (please dont freak out too much religious people) in heaven, the more advanced souls are genderless.

Source?

Youre on a forum board, you have internet, google search "genderless souls"

Is google in touch with the after life?

seriously?

You have to expand your mind for this one, i dont expect it from many people on this board.

You made the claim.

Weak that you can't back it up at all.

originally posted by: MysticPearl
a reply to: TzarChasm

There's this stupid idea floating around that if you're a boy and prefer female things and/or think like a girl, it means you're a girl trapped in a boys body rather than just a boy who leans feminine.

It's actually sexist by nature. It suggests if you feel or think a certain way you're either a boy or a girl. It suggests it's somehow unnatural to feel and think a certain way so you must be a different gender. It's insane.

The only reason a boy would think he's a girl and is trapped inside a boys body is because society has told him his thoughts and feelings are what girls have and think. How else would someone feel that way? A boy is supposed to feel like he's missing a uterus? That he doesn't feel right missing his period every month? That he prefers softball to baseball? That he likes dresses and makeup? Then put on a dress and makeup, you're simply a boy who then likes dresses and makeup just like a woman who likes to wear suits isn't a man trapped in a woman's body.

Actually, being a feminine boy is completely different than being a girl trapped in a boys body.

a reply to: MysticPearl

Do you have any evidence that the society is making them transgenders?
Thank you.

originally posted by: MysticPearl

originally posted by: veracity

originally posted by: MysticPearl

originally posted by: veracity

originally posted by: MysticPearl

originally posted by: veracity

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: elementalgrove

It would make more sense to increase the population of gay people for population control.

And isn't transhumanism a good thing? I admit I don't read much about it but from what I understand it means using science and technology to increase the human intelligence and psychology. Basically improving human beings.

on the other side or (please dont freak out too much religious people) in heaven, the more advanced souls are genderless.

Source?

Youre on a forum board, you have internet, google search "genderless souls"

Is google in touch with the after life?

seriously?

You have to expand your mind for this one, i dont expect it from many people on this board.

You made the claim.

Weak that you can't back it up at all.

I could write a book on the subject and there are already many books on the subject, you can start by google searching what I told you, i dont owe you anything, any backing up of the thought but you are welcome to research it if you want.

originally posted by: MysticPearl
a reply to: TzarChasm

There's this stupid idea floating around that if you're a boy and prefer female things and/or think like a girl, it means you're a girl trapped in a boys body rather than just a boy who leans feminine.

It's actually sexist by nature. It suggests if you feel or think a certain way you're either a boy or a girl. It suggests it's somehow unnatural to feel and think a certain way so you must be a different gender. It's insane.

The only reason a boy would think he's a girl and is trapped inside a boys body is because society has told him his thoughts and feelings are what girls have and think. How else would someone feel that way? A boy is supposed to feel like he's missing a uterus? That he doesn't feel right missing his period every month? That he prefers softball to baseball? That he likes dresses and makeup? Then put on a dress and makeup, you're simply a boy who then likes dresses and makeup just like a woman who likes to wear suits isn't a man trapped in a woman's body.

thank you, this is precisely what i am talking about.

originally posted by: veracity

originally posted by: MysticPearl
a reply to: TzarChasm

There's this stupid idea floating around that if you're a boy and prefer female things and/or think like a girl, it means you're a girl trapped in a boys body rather than just a boy who leans feminine.

It's actually sexist by nature. It suggests if you feel or think a certain way you're either a boy or a girl. It suggests it's somehow unnatural to feel and think a certain way so you must be a different gender. It's insane.

The only reason a boy would think he's a girl and is trapped inside a boys body is because society has told him his thoughts and feelings are what girls have and think. How else would someone feel that way? A boy is supposed to feel like he's missing a uterus? That he doesn't feel right missing his period every month? That he prefers softball to baseball? That he likes dresses and makeup? Then put on a dress and makeup, you're simply a boy who then likes dresses and makeup just like a woman who likes to wear suits isn't a man trapped in a woman's body.

Actually, being a feminine boy is completely different than being a girl trapped in a boys body.

by all means, go ahead and explain it to us because im obviously not the only one confused.

a reply to: dreamingawake

Destroying the individual as in setting them up for a lifetime of confusion.

Now if we are going to accept Transgender as normal we must also accept Transracial, Transpecies, and Transabled right?

I have been discussing social engineering and in that context, we are evolved with an agenda, slowly and over time. This is why I make the connection between trans anything and transhuman.

There is a full spectrum silent warfare going on to bring about the reduction in population and it includes the toxic food/water/air and IMHO destroying what it is to be a man or woman. This is in their own literature if you research the Tavistock Institute and the influence they have had.

Bringing this back to the OP, it does not matter what a grown adult wishes to do, introducing this to children is planting seeds in their mind that can lead to confusion that otherwise would not have occurred.

a reply to: elementalgrove

Now if we are going to accept Transgender as normal we must also accept Transracial, Transpecies, and Transabled right? 

Are you aware that the slippery slope argument is a fallacy?

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: veracity

originally posted by: MysticPearl
a reply to: TzarChasm

There's this stupid idea floating around that if you're a boy and prefer female things and/or think like a girl, it means you're a girl trapped in a boys body rather than just a boy who leans feminine.

It's actually sexist by nature. It suggests if you feel or think a certain way you're either a boy or a girl. It suggests it's somehow unnatural to feel and think a certain way so you must be a different gender. It's insane.

The only reason a boy would think he's a girl and is trapped inside a boys body is because society has told him his thoughts and feelings are what girls have and think. How else would someone feel that way? A boy is supposed to feel like he's missing a uterus? That he doesn't feel right missing his period every month? That he prefers softball to baseball? That he likes dresses and makeup? Then put on a dress and makeup, you're simply a boy who then likes dresses and makeup just like a woman who likes to wear suits isn't a man trapped in a woman's body.

Actually, being a feminine boy is completely different than being a girl trapped in a boys body.

by all means, go ahead and explain it to us because im obviously not the only one confused.

What is there to explain...being a feminine boy is different than being a boy feeling trapped in a girls body. I dont know how else to say it.

Being a masculine girl is different than being a girl trapped in a boys body

Im sure you are going to choose not to believe me bc it goes against your agenda, but maybe if you keep saying it over and over to yourself it will sink in?

originally posted by: veracity

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: veracity

originally posted by: MysticPearl
a reply to: TzarChasm

There's this stupid idea floating around that if you're a boy and prefer female things and/or think like a girl, it means you're a girl trapped in a boys body rather than just a boy who leans feminine.

It's actually sexist by nature. It suggests if you feel or think a certain way you're either a boy or a girl. It suggests it's somehow unnatural to feel and think a certain way so you must be a different gender. It's insane.

The only reason a boy would think he's a girl and is trapped inside a boys body is because society has told him his thoughts and feelings are what girls have and think. How else would someone feel that way? A boy is supposed to feel like he's missing a uterus? That he doesn't feel right missing his period every month? That he prefers softball to baseball? That he likes dresses and makeup? Then put on a dress and makeup, you're simply a boy who then likes dresses and makeup just like a woman who likes to wear suits isn't a man trapped in a woman's body.

Actually, being a feminine boy is completely different than being a girl trapped in a boys body.

by all means, go ahead and explain it to us because im obviously not the only one confused.

What is there to explain...being a feminine boy is different than being a boy feeling trapped in a girls body. I dont know how else to say it.

Being a masculine girl is different than being a girl trapped in a boys body

Im sure you are going to choose not to believe me bc it goes against your agenda, but maybe if you keep saying it over and over to yourself it will sink in?

i can see from the effort you put into your response that this exchange is going to be all kinds of enlightening. just saying something is different doesnt tell me why it is different. if you cant explain it to me, then how do you expect me to appreciate your perspective on the subject?

a reply to: TzarChasm

It's really a simple concept. You know bull dykes? (Forgive me for using that phrase). They look and act like men but they know they are not men.

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: elementalgrove

It would make more sense to increase the population of gay people for population control.

And isn't transhumanism a good thing? I admit I don't read much about it but from what I understand it means using science and technology to increase the human intelligence and psychology. Basically improving human beings.

I am glad that you ask, that was a part of the plan since at least 1969 as can be seen in this document...on the left hand side it lists encourage homosexuality.



The also list putting "fertility control agents in the water" and promoting women to work.

How much of our society do you believe to have organically evolved?

This is coming from the vice-president of planned parenthood at the time, prepared for the president of the "population council".

Social engineering is how all of this is passed of as societies own thoughts and decisions, currently we are seeing them unroll the trans agenda, really there is no other word for it.

The amount of endocrine disrupting chemicals found in the food/water is case and point. Now they are justifying the effects of these chemicals and their subtle programming and forcing it upon the population in the open.

You should read The Tavistock Institute on Human Relations by Dr. John Coleman, they have been studying the population for over 100 years and "social studies" is how they get us to pay to be programmed.