If you give a Mouse a Cookie and the Liberal LGBT Agenda

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: ReyaPhemhurth

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: GuidedKill

None of that has anything to do with who is attracted to whom. I know a guy who fell in love with a woman who can't have children. He knew this when he first met her, but fell in love with her anyway. You don't choose who you are attracted to. It just happens.

You're wife not being able to have children is based off her own body and it's physiological make up. I am truly sorry for her and you, but as you very well know having children is not a requirement for love or happiness....I never said that.

I just said being gay is not a genetic or a natural choice...people choose to be gay and are not influenced but anything scientific except personal beliefs.

And secondly, let's put it simpleton terms...you know..to assist with your continued willful ignorance:
If being gay is a choice/lifestyle, then you being straight is a choice and is a lifestyle.

Some would just call it mother nature...I have a three beautiful children born from their mother and I naturally..We didn't need a pinch hitter or a neighbor to act as a baby oven...

When I look at my kids I see their mother and I.....Not some me and some person I hit up on craigslist to help me and my gay lover do what heterosexuals can do naturally....Can gay couples say the same??

Ill wait for your answer.

Hey congrats on the fertility... that's outstanding.

But I have to ask... are parents of adopted children any less a "mother" or "father" to their children than parents of "natural" children?

no

Then WTF man?

Do you not see the flaws in your reasoning?

I personally know a few same sex couples that have adopted children and they are all just fine. I think your issue is that you have a sense of moral authority over others that just doesn't exist except in your own mind. Homosexuality offends that sense of moral authority so you rail against it.

Got news for you and all the other folks with that same false sense of authority... those days are numbered.

I never argued about the love...Only the that is it not anatomically or physiologically correct to be gay. I said it is not natural and people aren't born to be gay. It is a choice. PERIOD....

All I ever said...Matter of fact one of my original posts was that no one should be discriminated against....Then people got on this gay is not a choice I was born that way. And I said I disagree....the science backs my argument more than thiers is all. I was only pointing out that mother nature agrees with me judging by the fact that only males and females can reproduce...

My best bud grew to be gay cuz one of his balls never dropped... the lack of man hood is what makes men feminine

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: ReyaPhemhurth

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: GuidedKill

None of that has anything to do with who is attracted to whom. I know a guy who fell in love with a woman who can't have children. He knew this when he first met her, but fell in love with her anyway. You don't choose who you are attracted to. It just happens.

You're wife not being able to have children is based off her own body and it's physiological make up. I am truly sorry for her and you, but as you very well know having children is not a requirement for love or happiness....I never said that.

I just said being gay is not a genetic or a natural choice...people choose to be gay and are not influenced but anything scientific except personal beliefs.

And secondly, let's put it simpleton terms...you know..to assist with your continued willful ignorance:
If being gay is a choice/lifestyle, then you being straight is a choice and is a lifestyle.

Some would just call it mother nature...I have a three beautiful children born from their mother and I naturally..We didn't need a pinch hitter or a neighbor to act as a baby oven...

When I look at my kids I see their mother and I.....Not some me and some person I hit up on craigslist to help me and my gay lover do what heterosexuals can do naturally....Can gay couples say the same??

Ill wait for your answer.

Hey congrats on the fertility... that's outstanding.

But I have to ask... are parents of adopted children any less a "mother" or "father" to their children than parents of "natural" children?

no

Then WTF man?

Do you not see the flaws in your reasoning?

I personally know a few same sex couples that have adopted children and they are all just fine. I think your issue is that you have a sense of moral authority over others that just doesn't exist except in your own mind. Homosexuality offends that sense of moral authority so you rail against it.

Got news for you and all the other folks with that same false sense of authority... those days are numbered.

I never argued about the love...Only the that is it not anatomically or physiologically correct to be gay. I said it is not natural and people aren't born to be gay. It is a choice. PERIOD....

All I ever said...Matter of fact one of my original posts was that no one should be discriminated against....Then people got on this gay is not a choice I was born that way. And I said I disagree....the science backs my argument more than thiers is all. I was only pointing out that mother nature agrees with me judging by the fact that only males and females can reproduce...

that is it not anatomically or physiologically correct to be gay. I said it is not natural and people aren't born to be gay.

I get it... G*d doesn't make mistakes, right?

How do you explain hermaphrodites?

originally posted by: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: ReyaPhemhurth

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: GuidedKill

None of that has anything to do with who is attracted to whom. I know a guy who fell in love with a woman who can't have children. He knew this when he first met her, but fell in love with her anyway. You don't choose who you are attracted to. It just happens.

You're wife not being able to have children is based off her own body and it's physiological make up. I am truly sorry for her and you, but as you very well know having children is not a requirement for love or happiness....I never said that.

I just said being gay is not a genetic or a natural choice...people choose to be gay and are not influenced but anything scientific except personal beliefs.

And secondly, let's put it simpleton terms...you know..to assist with your continued willful ignorance:
If being gay is a choice/lifestyle, then you being straight is a choice and is a lifestyle.

Some would just call it mother nature...I have a three beautiful children born from their mother and I naturally..We didn't need a pinch hitter or a neighbor to act as a baby oven...

When I look at my kids I see their mother and I.....Not some me and some person I hit up on craigslist to help me and my gay lover do what heterosexuals can do naturally....Can gay couples say the same??

Ill wait for your answer.

Hey congrats on the fertility... that's outstanding.

But I have to ask... are parents of adopted children any less a "mother" or "father" to their children than parents of "natural" children?

no

Then WTF man?

Do you not see the flaws in your reasoning?

I personally know a few same sex couples that have adopted children and they are all just fine. I think your issue is that you have a sense of moral authority over others that just doesn't exist except in your own mind. Homosexuality offends that sense of moral authority so you rail against it.

Got news for you and all the other folks with that same false sense of authority... those days are numbered.

I never argued about the love...Only the that is it not anatomically or physiologically correct to be gay. I said it is not natural and people aren't born to be gay. It is a choice. PERIOD....

All I ever said...Matter of fact one of my original posts was that no one should be discriminated against....Then people got on this gay is not a choice I was born that way. And I said I disagree....the science backs my argument more than thiers is all. I was only pointing out that mother nature agrees with me judging by the fact that only males and females can reproduce...

My best bud grew to be gay cuz one of his balls never dropped... the lack of man hood is what makes men feminine

Wow....I can't even.....I think my eyes just rolled into the next county...

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: GuidedKill

I actually understand concepts like apoptosis and plasticity. You don't. I know about the development of sexuality in children. You don't.

These are key concepts that apply to this topic. But feel free to explain how your opinions hold as much weight as my scientifically backed facts.

And how exactly do you know what I know?? Is that part of your psychology background?

I have to go to work but will return later....Y'all try and find better arguments for my return!!

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: ReyaPhemhurth

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: GuidedKill

None of that has anything to do with who is attracted to whom. I know a guy who fell in love with a woman who can't have children. He knew this when he first met her, but fell in love with her anyway. You don't choose who you are attracted to. It just happens.

You're wife not being able to have children is based off her own body and it's physiological make up. I am truly sorry for her and you, but as you very well know having children is not a requirement for love or happiness....I never said that.

I just said being gay is not a genetic or a natural choice...people choose to be gay and are not influenced but anything scientific except personal beliefs.

And secondly, let's put it simpleton terms...you know..to assist with your continued willful ignorance:
If being gay is a choice/lifestyle, then you being straight is a choice and is a lifestyle.

Some would just call it mother nature...I have a three beautiful children born from their mother and I naturally..We didn't need a pinch hitter or a neighbor to act as a baby oven...

When I look at my kids I see their mother and I.....Not some me and some person I hit up on craigslist to help me and my gay lover do what heterosexuals can do naturally....Can gay couples say the same??

Ill wait for your answer.

Hey congrats on the fertility... that's outstanding.

But I have to ask... are parents of adopted children any less a "mother" or "father" to their children than parents of "natural" children?

no

Then WTF man?

Do you not see the flaws in your reasoning?

I personally know a few same sex couples that have adopted children and they are all just fine. I think your issue is that you have a sense of moral authority over others that just doesn't exist except in your own mind. Homosexuality offends that sense of moral authority so you rail against it.

Got news for you and all the other folks with that same false sense of authority... those days are numbered.

I never argued about the love...Only the that is it not anatomically or physiologically correct to be gay. I said it is not natural and people aren't born to be gay. It is a choice. PERIOD....

All I ever said...Matter of fact one of my original posts was that no one should be discriminated against....Then people got on this gay is not a choice I was born that way. And I said I disagree....the science backs my argument more than thiers is all. I was only pointing out that mother nature agrees with me judging by the fact that only males and females can reproduce...

that is it not anatomically or physiologically correct to be gay. I said it is not natural and people aren't born to be gay.

I get it... G*d doesn't make mistakes, right?

How do you explain hermaphrodites?

If god is put into the mix then the negative (gay) side effects of man kind would be the devil.

a reply to: GuidedKill

And I said I disagree....the science backs my argument more than thiers is all.

Except the meta-study (a study that reviews the results from many applicable studies) I posted a few pages back does not agree with that statement.

a reply to: Blarneystoner

Intersex people really shut the whole assigned gender trope down.

originally posted by: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: ReyaPhemhurth

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: GuidedKill

None of that has anything to do with who is attracted to whom. I know a guy who fell in love with a woman who can't have children. He knew this when he first met her, but fell in love with her anyway. You don't choose who you are attracted to. It just happens.

You're wife not being able to have children is based off her own body and it's physiological make up. I am truly sorry for her and you, but as you very well know having children is not a requirement for love or happiness....I never said that.

I just said being gay is not a genetic or a natural choice...people choose to be gay and are not influenced but anything scientific except personal beliefs.

And secondly, let's put it simpleton terms...you know..to assist with your continued willful ignorance:
If being gay is a choice/lifestyle, then you being straight is a choice and is a lifestyle.

Some would just call it mother nature...I have a three beautiful children born from their mother and I naturally..We didn't need a pinch hitter or a neighbor to act as a baby oven...

When I look at my kids I see their mother and I.....Not some me and some person I hit up on craigslist to help me and my gay lover do what heterosexuals can do naturally....Can gay couples say the same??

Ill wait for your answer.

Hey congrats on the fertility... that's outstanding.

But I have to ask... are parents of adopted children any less a "mother" or "father" to their children than parents of "natural" children?

no

Then WTF man?

Do you not see the flaws in your reasoning?

I personally know a few same sex couples that have adopted children and they are all just fine. I think your issue is that you have a sense of moral authority over others that just doesn't exist except in your own mind. Homosexuality offends that sense of moral authority so you rail against it.

Got news for you and all the other folks with that same false sense of authority... those days are numbered.

I never argued about the love...Only the that is it not anatomically or physiologically correct to be gay. I said it is not natural and people aren't born to be gay. It is a choice. PERIOD....

All I ever said...Matter of fact one of my original posts was that no one should be discriminated against....Then people got on this gay is not a choice I was born that way. And I said I disagree....the science backs my argument more than thiers is all. I was only pointing out that mother nature agrees with me judging by the fact that only males and females can reproduce...

that is it not anatomically or physiologically correct to be gay. I said it is not natural and people aren't born to be gay.

I get it... G*d doesn't make mistakes, right?

How do you explain hermaphrodites?

If god is put into the mix then the negative (gay) side effects of man kind would be the devil.

I really want to debate you and would truly love to reply in some way...but..your post...it really doesn't make any sense. Come back when you're parents get off work.

originally posted by: ReyaPhemhurth

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: GuidedKill

I actually understand concepts like apoptosis and plasticity. You don't. I know about the development of sexuality in children. You don't.

These are key concepts that apply to this topic. But feel free to explain how your opinions hold as much weight as my scientifically backed facts.

Get ready for more laughs.

I swear, GuidedKill should have his own sitcom for people to hatewatch.

His 'evidence' is based on things that he doesn't understand that, for those that DO understand, actually prove him wrong..as well...he will cite evidence such as 'I can just look between my legs as proof'.

When an argument effectively boils down to somebody saying "deez nuts" as a serious stance... you may as well give up.

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: GuidedKill

I actually understand concepts like apoptosis and plasticity. You don't. I know about the development of sexuality in children. You don't.

These are key concepts that apply to this topic. But feel free to explain how your opinions hold as much weight as my scientifically backed facts.

And how exactly do you know what I know?? Is that part of your psychology background?

He's not saying he knows what you know. Your complete lack of understanding is self evident just by reading your posts.

originally posted by: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: ReyaPhemhurth

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: GuidedKill

None of that has anything to do with who is attracted to whom. I know a guy who fell in love with a woman who can't have children. He knew this when he first met her, but fell in love with her anyway. You don't choose who you are attracted to. It just happens.

You're wife not being able to have children is based off her own body and it's physiological make up. I am truly sorry for her and you, but as you very well know having children is not a requirement for love or happiness....I never said that.

I just said being gay is not a genetic or a natural choice...people choose to be gay and are not influenced but anything scientific except personal beliefs.

And secondly, let's put it simpleton terms...you know..to assist with your continued willful ignorance:
If being gay is a choice/lifestyle, then you being straight is a choice and is a lifestyle.

Some would just call it mother nature...I have a three beautiful children born from their mother and I naturally..We didn't need a pinch hitter or a neighbor to act as a baby oven...

When I look at my kids I see their mother and I.....Not some me and some person I hit up on craigslist to help me and my gay lover do what heterosexuals can do naturally....Can gay couples say the same??

Ill wait for your answer.

Hey congrats on the fertility... that's outstanding.

But I have to ask... are parents of adopted children any less a "mother" or "father" to their children than parents of "natural" children?

no

Then WTF man?

Do you not see the flaws in your reasoning?

I personally know a few same sex couples that have adopted children and they are all just fine. I think your issue is that you have a sense of moral authority over others that just doesn't exist except in your own mind. Homosexuality offends that sense of moral authority so you rail against it.

Got news for you and all the other folks with that same false sense of authority... those days are numbered.

I never argued about the love...Only the that is it not anatomically or physiologically correct to be gay. I said it is not natural and people aren't born to be gay. It is a choice. PERIOD....

All I ever said...Matter of fact one of my original posts was that no one should be discriminated against....Then people got on this gay is not a choice I was born that way. And I said I disagree....the science backs my argument more than thiers is all. I was only pointing out that mother nature agrees with me judging by the fact that only males and females can reproduce...

that is it not anatomically or physiologically correct to be gay. I said it is not natural and people aren't born to be gay.

I get it... G*d doesn't make mistakes, right?

How do you explain hermaphrodites?

If god is put into the mix then the negative (gay) side effects of man kind would be the devil.

I may be off base to assume that the reason behind a false sense of moral authority is due to a belief in God... but if God created all things, then he created the devil too.

...but that's a whole 'nuther discussion.

originally posted by: ReyaPhemhurth

originally posted by: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: ReyaPhemhurth

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: GuidedKill

None of that has anything to do with who is attracted to whom. I know a guy who fell in love with a woman who can't have children. He knew this when he first met her, but fell in love with her anyway. You don't choose who you are attracted to. It just happens.

You're wife not being able to have children is based off her own body and it's physiological make up. I am truly sorry for her and you, but as you very well know having children is not a requirement for love or happiness....I never said that.

I just said being gay is not a genetic or a natural choice...people choose to be gay and are not influenced but anything scientific except personal beliefs.

And secondly, let's put it simpleton terms...you know..to assist with your continued willful ignorance:
If being gay is a choice/lifestyle, then you being straight is a choice and is a lifestyle.

Some would just call it mother nature...I have a three beautiful children born from their mother and I naturally..We didn't need a pinch hitter or a neighbor to act as a baby oven...

When I look at my kids I see their mother and I.....Not some me and some person I hit up on craigslist to help me and my gay lover do what heterosexuals can do naturally....Can gay couples say the same??

Ill wait for your answer.

Hey congrats on the fertility... that's outstanding.

But I have to ask... are parents of adopted children any less a "mother" or "father" to their children than parents of "natural" children?

no

Then WTF man?

Do you not see the flaws in your reasoning?

I personally know a few same sex couples that have adopted children and they are all just fine. I think your issue is that you have a sense of moral authority over others that just doesn't exist except in your own mind. Homosexuality offends that sense of moral authority so you rail against it.

Got news for you and all the other folks with that same false sense of authority... those days are numbered.

I never argued about the love...Only the that is it not anatomically or physiologically correct to be gay. I said it is not natural and people aren't born to be gay. It is a choice. PERIOD....

All I ever said...Matter of fact one of my original posts was that no one should be discriminated against....Then people got on this gay is not a choice I was born that way. And I said I disagree....the science backs my argument more than thiers is all. I was only pointing out that mother nature agrees with me judging by the fact that only males and females can reproduce...

that is it not anatomically or physiologically correct to be gay. I said it is not natural and people aren't born to be gay.

I get it... G*d doesn't make mistakes, right?

How do you explain hermaphrodites?

If god is put into the mix then the negative (gay) side effects of man kind would be the devil.

I really want to debate you and would truly love to reply in some way...but..your post...it really doesn't make any sense. Come back when you're parents get off work.

Yee, doesnt make sense men like to dress like a little girl and honestly believe they are girls but here we are, arguing with delusional people

a reply to: GuidedKill

The lack of knowledge you've shown in this thread is evidence enough.

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: GuidedKill

I actually understand concepts like apoptosis and plasticity. You don't. I know about the development of sexuality in children. You don't.

These are key concepts that apply to this topic. But feel free to explain how your opinions hold as much weight as my scientifically backed facts.

And how exactly do you know what I know?? Is that part of your psychology background?

Your general knowledge on this topic is rather obvious from your posting and refusal to look at anything serously beyond your preconceived notions.

originally posted by: Abysha

originally posted by: ReyaPhemhurth

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: GuidedKill

I actually understand concepts like apoptosis and plasticity. You don't. I know about the development of sexuality in children. You don't.

These are key concepts that apply to this topic. But feel free to explain how your opinions hold as much weight as my scientifically backed facts.

Get ready for more laughs.

I swear, GuidedKill should have his own sitcom for people to hatewatch.

His 'evidence' is based on things that he doesn't understand that, for those that DO understand, actually prove him wrong..as well...he will cite evidence such as 'I can just look between my legs as proof'.

When an argument effectively boils down to somebody saying "deez nuts" as a serious stance... you may as well give up.

Haha, exactly. Especially when they've gone out of their way to decorate their mini-profile with guns and deer heads.

originally posted by: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx

originally posted by: ReyaPhemhurth

originally posted by: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: ReyaPhemhurth

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: GuidedKill

None of that has anything to do with who is attracted to whom. I know a guy who fell in love with a woman who can't have children. He knew this when he first met her, but fell in love with her anyway. You don't choose who you are attracted to. It just happens.

You're wife not being able to have children is based off her own body and it's physiological make up. I am truly sorry for her and you, but as you very well know having children is not a requirement for love or happiness....I never said that.

I just said being gay is not a genetic or a natural choice...people choose to be gay and are not influenced but anything scientific except personal beliefs.

And secondly, let's put it simpleton terms...you know..to assist with your continued willful ignorance:
If being gay is a choice/lifestyle, then you being straight is a choice and is a lifestyle.

Some would just call it mother nature...I have a three beautiful children born from their mother and I naturally..We didn't need a pinch hitter or a neighbor to act as a baby oven...

When I look at my kids I see their mother and I.....Not some me and some person I hit up on craigslist to help me and my gay lover do what heterosexuals can do naturally....Can gay couples say the same??

Ill wait for your answer.

Hey congrats on the fertility... that's outstanding.

But I have to ask... are parents of adopted children any less a "mother" or "father" to their children than parents of "natural" children?

no

Then WTF man?

Do you not see the flaws in your reasoning?

I personally know a few same sex couples that have adopted children and they are all just fine. I think your issue is that you have a sense of moral authority over others that just doesn't exist except in your own mind. Homosexuality offends that sense of moral authority so you rail against it.

Got news for you and all the other folks with that same false sense of authority... those days are numbered.

I never argued about the love...Only the that is it not anatomically or physiologically correct to be gay. I said it is not natural and people aren't born to be gay. It is a choice. PERIOD....

All I ever said...Matter of fact one of my original posts was that no one should be discriminated against....Then people got on this gay is not a choice I was born that way. And I said I disagree....the science backs my argument more than thiers is all. I was only pointing out that mother nature agrees with me judging by the fact that only males and females can reproduce...

that is it not anatomically or physiologically correct to be gay. I said it is not natural and people aren't born to be gay.

I get it... G*d doesn't make mistakes, right?

How do you explain hermaphrodites?

If god is put into the mix then the negative (gay) side effects of man kind would be the devil.

I really want to debate you and would truly love to reply in some way...but..your post...it really doesn't make any sense. Come back when you're parents get off work.

Yee, doesnt make sense men like to dress like a little girl and honestly believe they are girls but here we are, arguing with delusional people

Care to explain why intersex people exist?

originally posted by: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx

originally posted by: ReyaPhemhurth

originally posted by: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: ReyaPhemhurth

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: GuidedKill

None of that has anything to do with who is attracted to whom. I know a guy who fell in love with a woman who can't have children. He knew this when he first met her, but fell in love with her anyway. You don't choose who you are attracted to. It just happens.

You're wife not being able to have children is based off her own body and it's physiological make up. I am truly sorry for her and you, but as you very well know having children is not a requirement for love or happiness....I never said that.

I just said being gay is not a genetic or a natural choice...people choose to be gay and are not influenced but anything scientific except personal beliefs.

And secondly, let's put it simpleton terms...you know..to assist with your continued willful ignorance:
If being gay is a choice/lifestyle, then you being straight is a choice and is a lifestyle.

Some would just call it mother nature...I have a three beautiful children born from their mother and I naturally..We didn't need a pinch hitter or a neighbor to act as a baby oven...

When I look at my kids I see their mother and I.....Not some me and some person I hit up on craigslist to help me and my gay lover do what heterosexuals can do naturally....Can gay couples say the same??

Ill wait for your answer.

Hey congrats on the fertility... that's outstanding.

But I have to ask... are parents of adopted children any less a "mother" or "father" to their children than parents of "natural" children?

no

Then WTF man?

Do you not see the flaws in your reasoning?

I personally know a few same sex couples that have adopted children and they are all just fine. I think your issue is that you have a sense of moral authority over others that just doesn't exist except in your own mind. Homosexuality offends that sense of moral authority so you rail against it.

Got news for you and all the other folks with that same false sense of authority... those days are numbered.

I never argued about the love...Only the that is it not anatomically or physiologically correct to be gay. I said it is not natural and people aren't born to be gay. It is a choice. PERIOD....

All I ever said...Matter of fact one of my original posts was that no one should be discriminated against....Then people got on this gay is not a choice I was born that way. And I said I disagree....the science backs my argument more than thiers is all. I was only pointing out that mother nature agrees with me judging by the fact that only males and females can reproduce...

that is it not anatomically or physiologically correct to be gay. I said it is not natural and people aren't born to be gay.

I get it... G*d doesn't make mistakes, right?

How do you explain hermaphrodites?

If god is put into the mix then the negative (gay) side effects of man kind would be the devil.

I really want to debate you and would truly love to reply in some way...but..your post...it really doesn't make any sense. Come back when you're parents get off work.

Yee, doesnt make sense men like to dress like a little girl and honestly believe they are girls but here we are, arguing with delusional people

A simple, yet incorrect generalization made on behalf of a simple and incorrect individual. Again, I wouldn't bother posting until you've done all the necessary research on all fronts. Your post shows that you, much like Guidedkill, do not understand the science behind it.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx

originally posted by: ReyaPhemhurth

originally posted by: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: ReyaPhemhurth

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: GuidedKill

None of that has anything to do with who is attracted to whom. I know a guy who fell in love with a woman who can't have children. He knew this when he first met her, but fell in love with her anyway. You don't choose who you are attracted to. It just happens.

You're wife not being able to have children is based off her own body and it's physiological make up. I am truly sorry for her and you, but as you very well know having children is not a requirement for love or happiness....I never said that.

I just said being gay is not a genetic or a natural choice...people choose to be gay and are not influenced but anything scientific except personal beliefs.

And secondly, let's put it simpleton terms...you know..to assist with your continued willful ignorance:
If being gay is a choice/lifestyle, then you being straight is a choice and is a lifestyle.

Some would just call it mother nature...I have a three beautiful children born from their mother and I naturally..We didn't need a pinch hitter or a neighbor to act as a baby oven...

When I look at my kids I see their mother and I.....Not some me and some person I hit up on craigslist to help me and my gay lover do what heterosexuals can do naturally....Can gay couples say the same??

Ill wait for your answer.

Hey congrats on the fertility... that's outstanding.

But I have to ask... are parents of adopted children any less a "mother" or "father" to their children than parents of "natural" children?

no

Then WTF man?

Do you not see the flaws in your reasoning?

I personally know a few same sex couples that have adopted children and they are all just fine. I think your issue is that you have a sense of moral authority over others that just doesn't exist except in your own mind. Homosexuality offends that sense of moral authority so you rail against it.

Got news for you and all the other folks with that same false sense of authority... those days are numbered.

I never argued about the love...Only the that is it not anatomically or physiologically correct to be gay. I said it is not natural and people aren't born to be gay. It is a choice. PERIOD....

All I ever said...Matter of fact one of my original posts was that no one should be discriminated against....Then people got on this gay is not a choice I was born that way. And I said I disagree....the science backs my argument more than thiers is all. I was only pointing out that mother nature agrees with me judging by the fact that only males and females can reproduce...

that is it not anatomically or physiologically correct to be gay. I said it is not natural and people aren't born to be gay.

I get it... G*d doesn't make mistakes, right?

How do you explain hermaphrodites?

If god is put into the mix then the negative (gay) side effects of man kind would be the devil.

I really want to debate you and would truly love to reply in some way...but..your post...it really doesn't make any sense. Come back when you're parents get off work.

Yee, doesnt make sense men like to dress like a little girl and honestly believe they are girls but here we are, arguing with delusional people

Care to explain why intersex people exist?

Thats a matter of opinion, if you think a dress makes a man a girl or chopping his dick off makes him a girl then by all means, believe away.

originally posted by: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx

originally posted by: ReyaPhemhurth

originally posted by: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: ReyaPhemhurth

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: GuidedKill

None of that has anything to do with who is attracted to whom. I know a guy who fell in love with a woman who can't have children. He knew this when he first met her, but fell in love with her anyway. You don't choose who you are attracted to. It just happens.

You're wife not being able to have children is based off her own body and it's physiological make up. I am truly sorry for her and you, but as you very well know having children is not a requirement for love or happiness....I never said that.

I just said being gay is not a genetic or a natural choice...people choose to be gay and are not influenced but anything scientific except personal beliefs.

And secondly, let's put it simpleton terms...you know..to assist with your continued willful ignorance:
If being gay is a choice/lifestyle, then you being straight is a choice and is a lifestyle.

Some would just call it mother nature...I have a three beautiful children born from their mother and I naturally..We didn't need a pinch hitter or a neighbor to act as a baby oven...

When I look at my kids I see their mother and I.....Not some me and some person I hit up on craigslist to help me and my gay lover do what heterosexuals can do naturally....Can gay couples say the same??

Ill wait for your answer.

Hey congrats on the fertility... that's outstanding.

But I have to ask... are parents of adopted children any less a "mother" or "father" to their children than parents of "natural" children?

no

Then WTF man?

Do you not see the flaws in your reasoning?

I personally know a few same sex couples that have adopted children and they are all just fine. I think your issue is that you have a sense of moral authority over others that just doesn't exist except in your own mind. Homosexuality offends that sense of moral authority so you rail against it.

Got news for you and all the other folks with that same false sense of authority... those days are numbered.

I never argued about the love...Only the that is it not anatomically or physiologically correct to be gay. I said it is not natural and people aren't born to be gay. It is a choice. PERIOD....

All I ever said...Matter of fact one of my original posts was that no one should be discriminated against....Then people got on this gay is not a choice I was born that way. And I said I disagree....the science backs my argument more than thiers is all. I was only pointing out that mother nature agrees with me judging by the fact that only males and females can reproduce...

that is it not anatomically or physiologically correct to be gay. I said it is not natural and people aren't born to be gay.

I get it... G*d doesn't make mistakes, right?

How do you explain hermaphrodites?

If god is put into the mix then the negative (gay) side effects of man kind would be the devil.

I really want to debate you and would truly love to reply in some way...but..your post...it really doesn't make any sense. Come back when you're parents get off work.

Yee, doesnt make sense men like to dress like a little girl and honestly believe they are girls but here we are, arguing with delusional people

The only delusion I see displayed here is the delusion of moral authority and a sense of "right and wrong" that doesn't exist.

originally posted by: ReyaPhemhurth

originally posted by: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx

originally posted by: ReyaPhemhurth

originally posted by: xSEEKxNxSTRIKEx

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Blarneystoner

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: ReyaPhemhurth

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: GuidedKill

None of that has anything to do with who is attracted to whom. I know a guy who fell in love with a woman who can't have children. He knew this when he first met her, but fell in love with her anyway. You don't choose who you are attracted to. It just happens.

You're wife not being able to have children is based off her own body and it's physiological make up. I am truly sorry for her and you, but as you very well know having children is not a requirement for love or happiness....I never said that.

I just said being gay is not a genetic or a natural choice...people choose to be gay and are not influenced but anything scientific except personal beliefs.

And secondly, let's put it simpleton terms...you know..to assist with your continued willful ignorance:
If being gay is a choice/lifestyle, then you being straight is a choice and is a lifestyle.

Some would just call it mother nature...I have a three beautiful children born from their mother and I naturally..We didn't need a pinch hitter or a neighbor to act as a baby oven...

When I look at my kids I see their mother and I.....Not some me and some person I hit up on craigslist to help me and my gay lover do what heterosexuals can do naturally....Can gay couples say the same??

Ill wait for your answer.

Hey congrats on the fertility... that's outstanding.

But I have to ask... are parents of adopted children any less a "mother" or "father" to their children than parents of "natural" children?

no

Then WTF man?

Do you not see the flaws in your reasoning?

I personally know a few same sex couples that have adopted children and they are all just fine. I think your issue is that you have a sense of moral authority over others that just doesn't exist except in your own mind. Homosexuality offends that sense of moral authority so you rail against it.

Got news for you and all the other folks with that same false sense of authority... those days are numbered.

I never argued about the love...Only the that is it not anatomically or physiologically correct to be gay. I said it is not natural and people aren't born to be gay. It is a choice. PERIOD....

All I ever said...Matter of fact one of my original posts was that no one should be discriminated against....Then people got on this gay is not a choice I was born that way. And I said I disagree....the science backs my argument more than thiers is all. I was only pointing out that mother nature agrees with me judging by the fact that only males and females can reproduce...

that is it not anatomically or physiologically correct to be gay. I said it is not natural and people aren't born to be gay.

I get it... G*d doesn't make mistakes, right?

How do you explain hermaphrodites?

If god is put into the mix then the negative (gay) side effects of man kind would be the devil.

I really want to debate you and would truly love to reply in some way...but..your post...it really doesn't make any sense. Come back when you're parents get off work.

Yee, doesnt make sense men like to dress like a little girl and honestly believe they are girls but here we are, arguing with delusional people

A simple, yet incorrect generalization made on behalf of a simple and incorrect individual. Again, I wouldn't bother posting until you've done all the necessary research on all fronts. Your post shows that you, much like Guidedkill, do not understand the science behind it.

Ya know, science can prove and disprove anything you want. But if google makes you feel smarter then google away