a reply to:
FyreByrd
The amazing thing here is you picked "lies" to quote that aren't even lies.
-Time magazine... obviously Trump was cracking a joke about having been on the cover the most of anyone.
-Trump was speaking from statistics on Chicago, a place which averages 2.09 people murdered per day.
-The 109 people figure was an actual number at one point in the process.
www.washingtonpost.com...
-keeps-changing/?utm_term=.35ddf5bb8bf7 Fairly sure if you dug into it, the President's figure was accurate per whatever SitUp he had in front of him
at 3 AM the morning after the order was in effect.
-Not a lie, just a difference in expectations versus explanations.
-Uh, who were the two?
en.wikipedia.org... Trump's final candidate submitted to the Senate was Ag Sec Sonny Perdue,
who was submitted in mid January. Who's the liar here?
-Because Bush released 113 this makes mentioning Obama's releasees a lie because why? What Non Sequitur devilry is being applied here? Because GWB
screwed up royally it makes an equal or great screw up by the president following him into the office a screw up which must not be pointed out lest
the pointer be falsely called a liar?
-Yes, NATO fought terrorism with US dollars. The inclusion of this is in itself a lie. Trump's argument against NATO was accurate, and centered on
the fact that, at past levels of funding and effort, NATO would be DEAD if the US opted to withdraw. In other words, they've skied America's
coattails for decades.
-Again, he's obviously talking about what HE BELIEVES is appropriate measures against terrorism, not just general "I'm fighting terror" horsecrap. I
can sit in a lawn chair in my backyard with a rifle and say "I'm hunting caribou" and that isn't a lie, I just won't be in any way successful at it.
My neighbor can come home from a grueling hunt on the tundra with a caribou, and say "Ha, you're not hunting squat" and not be lying either, as he's
saying "What you're doing is ineffective and not what I consider 'hunting'"
So, got any actual lies, or just a list of subjective inconveniences?