It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Lastrexking
The sites making these claims are hardly reliable, impartial news sources. They're far right supporters.
It's so far beyond fake news.
Are they no-go zones? Well, not really. This term caught on in international media after it was used by a columnist to label these areas, but police and emergency services have themselves repeatedly rejected it, arguing that these are areas with a higher police presence, if anything. That said, emergency services do often adapt their behavior, for example by making sure that there is proper back-up, by entering the areas via alternative routes, or by reversing their vehicles into the areas in order to make sure they are able to leave quickly if needed. Emergency services have, for example, been exposed to threats, stone-throwing, or vandalism of their vehicles. But it's not black and white: often, nothing of note happens.
originally posted by: Jiggly
holy war incoming
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: CulturalResilience
The Islam apologist and sympathy crowd are conspicuous in their absence. The snowflakes must be having their collective moon time.
Rise from the grave Vlad, and save civilisation from Islam once more.
Well at one point or another one comes to the conclusion that you cannot fix stupid , you guys are happy in your circle jerk of ignorance...
originally posted by: Butterfinger
originally posted by: Jiggly
holy war incoming
Its already here, the West is the only ones who just cant admit it.
originally posted by: CulturalResilience
The Islam apologist and sympathy crowd are conspicuous in their absence. The snowflakes must be having their collective moon time.
Rise from the grave Vlad, and save civilisation from Islam once more.
originally posted by: Violater1
Actually, it was The Winged Polish Hussars that wiped out the muslim occupation of Vienna Austria in 1530. The Poles chased out the muslims that invaded Europe. To this day, it remains the most successful Calvary charge in history.
originally posted by: Butterfinger
originally posted by: Skorpy
a reply to: Butterfinger
There are always some people that would rather surrender/submit and convert instead of go to war in order to keep the peace.
Not necessarily a bad thing.
Surrender/submission or conversion by coercion or force is a bad thing.
originally posted by: audubon
originally posted by: Violater1
Actually, it was The Winged Polish Hussars that wiped out the muslim occupation of Vienna Austria in 1530. The Poles chased out the muslims that invaded Europe. To this day, it remains the most successful Calvary charge in history.
Not quite accurate. It was a siege intended as a prelude to attempted invasion (not an occupation), and the force behind it was the Ottoman Empire. Which was a Muslim power, true, but that doesn't make it represent Islam as a whole.
I don't know how it could be any clearer: austerity, properly understood, works.
originally posted by: staticfl
a reply to: ElectricUniverse
Good luck over there... should have studied history and learn what defeated the Romans: Internal politics and immigration.