Georgia Special Election to Replace U.S. Representative Tom Price is a BIG DEAL.

originally posted by: toysforadults
Maybe they will vote in a libertarian?

Dont be stupid.

Americans are binary brained idiots that can only handle the concept of 2 parties

originally posted by: Aazadan

originally posted by: carewemust
For this Georgia election, I see that the New York Times got rid of that stupid thermometer...the one that showed Hillary with a 93% chance of winning before the polls closed.. Or was it a speedometer? Whatever..they looked like total fools that night and still hate Trump to this day.

www.nytimes.com...

How do you know Hillary didn't have a 93% chance of winning?

Low percentage outcomes do happen. They happen a lot actually.

In the mind of the New York Times, maybe she did. Good point!

Don;t forget SC District 5 Special election is also tonight

originally posted by: UKTruth
Don;t forget SC District 5 Special election is also tonight

From what I heard today, Republicans have that one in the bag.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: UKTruth
Don;t forget SC District 5 Special election is also tonight

From what I heard today, Republicans have that one in the bag.

Yep sounds like it - but then Hillary had the Presidency in the bag too

2 polling stations staying open late after judge rules on 'technical' issues - both station in Democrat strongholds.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: UKTruth
Don;t forget SC District 5 Special election is also tonight

From what I heard today, Republicans have that one in the bag.

Yep sounds like it - but then Hillary had the Presidency in the bag too

That was FAKE SPIN from the liberal MSM. Most people ignored the most historically accurate poll...the IBD.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

originally posted by: UKTruth
2 polling stations staying open late after judge rules on 'technical' issues - both station in Democrat strongholds.

The turnout there was so large that they couldn't get everyone in the door before 7pm.

originally posted by: carewemust
140,000 people early-voted. Is that a lot? Those will be counted first.

266,000 total estimated votes. 140,000 of those were cast before today.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: carewemust
140,000 people early-voted. Is that a lot? Those will be counted first.

266,000 total estimated votes. 140,000 of those were cast before today.

I doubt there will be only 266k votes.. there were 310k in November.
If the turnout is as low as you say then Dems have no chance.

lol first update on Decision desk is Handel 6 votes Ossoff 3
Why bother updating for 9 votes!



...second update 9-7 Handel

originally posted by: UKTruth
lol first update on Decision desk is Handel 6 votes Ossoff 3
Why bother updating for 9 votes!

...second update 9-7 Handel

So I assume CNN can call it, right?

Well, this is it.

If a democrat is elected, then Trump should just retire.

The people have spoken.

Let's start impeaching Pence!

Grrrrrr-shakes fist-rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: UKTruth
lol first update on Decision desk is Handel 6 votes Ossoff 3
Why bother updating for 9 votes!

...second update 9-7 Handel

So I assume CNN can call it, right?

Lol...

This one is so close

Handel 37,140
Ossoff 35,111

estimated 27% of the vote in... projection is +0.4% Handel, but we all know how useless NYT projections are.

I suspect the large batch of votes that just came in is the early vote.

As usual the Democrat strongholds seem to be the last to start reporting. That is a trend that was very obvious during the general Election.

originally posted by: UKTruth
I doubt there will be only 266k votes.. there were 310k in November.
If the turnout is as low as you say then Dems have no chance.

Presidential elections get a far larger voter turnout.

a reply to: MOMof3

Always have to denigrate the specter of anyone voting against your party's candidate because, you know, it just not possible that democracy sometimes means your position isn't the correct one, ya?

originally posted by: crazyewok

originally posted by: toysforadults
Maybe they will vote in a libertarian?

Dont be stupid.

Americans are binary brained idiots that can only handle the concept of 2 parties

For that to be true, it would take at least a few elections in which the third party candidate wasn't an unelectable kook. To date, those haven't been easy to find.

originally posted by: Aazadan

originally posted by: UKTruth
I doubt there will be only 266k votes.. there were 310k in November.
If the turnout is as low as you say then Dems have no chance.

Presidential elections get a far larger voter turnout.

Yes for sure, but this the Democrats Waterloo. They spent a fortune... I would have expected them to get far more of a Democrat turnout than even the General Election.

originally posted by: UKTruth
As usual the Democrat strongholds seem to be the last to start reporting. That is a trend that was very obvious during the general Election.

Hard to finagle vote counts accurately until you know what you need...