It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I don't, but if 30 women all have the same story, i tend to believe them.
originally posted by: Woodcarver
of course the defense claims that the evidence was planted by racists. That is always the claim from the defense. And yet he still got off, and the jurors admitted that it was their bias towards a rich Black man.
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: intrptr
Merely pointing out OJ is an outlier from the other cases where we have black people who there is not much evidence but convicted in the public media. OJ is not that case, OJ did it, tons of evidence.
"Evidence" the defense claim was planted by racist LA PD.
So you think OJ and Rodney King were not guilty?
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: Woodcarver
of course the defense claims that the evidence was planted by racists. That is always the claim from the defense. And yet he still got off, and the jurors admitted that it was their bias towards a rich Black man.
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: intrptr
Merely pointing out OJ is an outlier from the other cases where we have black people who there is not much evidence but convicted in the public media. OJ is not that case, OJ did it, tons of evidence.
"Evidence" the defense claim was planted by racist LA PD.
Against Rodney King verdict, more deeply, against the LAPD, notoriously racist for decades.
Edit: Youre still missing the point, guilty or not these were show trials to foment racism.
Gotta keep the blackman down.
Yawn, wake me when Bill Clinton goes to trial for his behavior.
intrptr out
Witches aren't real. Maybe that is your problem.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Woodcarver
I don't, but if 30 women all have the same story, i tend to believe them.
You should revisit Salem Witch trials.
Or the witch hunts in Germany, the most prolific.
A wagging finger, pointing , "Wittttch... ye'll burrrrrn".
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Woodcarver
I don't, but if 30 women all have the same story, i tend to believe them.
You should revisit Salem Witch trials.
Or the witch hunts in Germany, the most prolific.
A wagging finger, pointing , "Wittttch... ye'll burrrrrn".
originally posted by: Woodcarver
The other 29 women that should have been in the case.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Woodcarver
This trial is not 30 women, it's 1 woman, so what evidence are you talking about?
That is not what i am saying at all.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: Woodcarver
The other 29 women that should have been in the case.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Woodcarver
This trial is not 30 women, it's 1 woman, so what evidence are you talking about?
So Juries should make decisions based on evidence not presented but that they think should have been? I am glad you are not in charge of the system.
This is a very good point. Our legal system is written to make a loophole for anything. Prosecution and defence. Your verdict depends on how much money you can throw at your defence.
originally posted by: craterman
Jeopardy of the defendant begins when the jury is seated, so when a second jury is seated, THAT is double jeopardy! Regardless weather Cosby is innocent or guilty, this BS of continually trying a case is just that BS. In common law, the prosecutor has abandoned the case. The defendant should have objected at the judge declaring a mistrial. Guilty in a criminal case is 'beyond a reasonable doubt'. Obviously the jury seated sees 'reasonable doubt'. In common law this fact prevented a malicious prosecution because even a hung jury ended the matter forever. Our 'legal system' has turned into a for profit (even prisons for profit) too of enrichment. From family court with its federal matching funds to the victim-less made up drug crimes of the legislatures with its prisons for profit. It is a satanic, disgusting mess!!
originally posted by: Woodcarver
A mistrial is not proof that the system works. We don't know if he drugged those women or not.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: TinySickTears
It is BS. A trial based on hear say without any forensics is not a trial, its a witch-hunt.
Sorry out there in lala land, as much as y'all like to see another wealthy black man brought down, the jury became locked over the fact there is none but accusations to go on.
In this case the system worked.
Blah wah...
(backs slowly away)
And why would it matter if he is black or not? Sounds like you are calling anyone who believes he did it a racist. That seems a bit biased to me.
www.tmz.com...