8 more areas in Sweden added to list of so-called 'no-go zones’

a reply to: ScepticScot

I think "quite fine" is awfully subjective here...

a reply to: Vroomfondel

Strong economy, low crime, stable democracy, high standard of living and beer. Lots n lots of beer.

Doesn't sound like your typical 'invaded' country.

a reply to: dukeofjive696969

you are stupid squared
No go zones are not debunked and they exist even in minneapolis my area. Of course they are not officially rcognized sanctioned promoted with signs and such but the message is loud and clear that kaffirs and non moslems are not welcome. Liberals are the ones that ignore facts statistics truths and common sense.
thisisengland.info...
www.weeklystandard.com...
www.youtube.com...
www.bing.com... RE
www.wnd.com...
www.youtube.com...
pjmedia.com...
www.dailywire.com...
www.dailymail.co.uk...
obrl.blogspot.com...
www.youtube.com...
www.telegraph.co.uk...

a reply to: BlueAjah

US should send all our refuges to Native's reservations. We solve our refugee problem and natives get a nice scalp market.

a reply to: heavymental

Progressives need to do a road trip and find out for themselves.
Live stream it.
I'll be cheering "Hit em with your purse lib! Fight the good fight!"

a reply to: heavymental

You know the U. S has a really big immigrant problem, some of your cities are cesspools of violence .i honestly think some of you wish Europe was as bad as the U. S.

I have news for you it's not even close.

originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: heavymental

Progressives need to do a road trip and find out for themselves.
Live stream it.
I'll be cheering "Hit em with your purse lib! Fight the good fight!"

People that have not travelled are the problem not progressives.

The problem lies when ignorant people get their worldview from the media. It simply is not accurate.

originally posted by: NightSkyeB4Dawn
a reply to: RomeByFire
I am not sure what folk are arguing about here.

Of course there are areas in America where anyone with an ounce of sense would not go into unless they had to.

I used to do healthcare in the field and there were areas were my patients would meet me outside their compounds or arranged for an escort for me to get to their homes. They made it very clear that I was never to enter the area on my own. I call them compounds because they were surrounded by fencing and some areas even had barbed wire at the top. They were containment fences, and in some areas the surrounding roads where restructured to control the traffic going into and out of the compound.

Even after months of going and coming into the areas, after the people in the community knew my name, and knew why I was there, I would face the animosity from a resident time and again.

The police are not afraid to go into these areas, they just know what to expect and they are well prepared before entering. The same with paramedics. They don't go into those areas without escorts.

We can sit around and play games with semantics, but at the end of the day, if anyone is being honest, they have to admit that there are areas all over that are "extremely vulnerable" and you stay the hell out, unless you are looking for trouble or have been invited in.

What you're explaining is not even remotely similar to one of these fabricated "Muslim no-go zones."

I grew up on Star Street. If you live in this area, you know that's a rough place to be at.

Oh. And I'm white.

Playing games and semantics?

Nope. Being logical and rational. I was a white kid growing up in a not so white neighborhood. You think I was scared to walk around alone at night.....?

Of course you do. Except for I wasn't, and I'm still not, because I don't live my life in fear and I can damn well protect myself.

Again - what does this have to do with imaginary Muslim no-go zones?

originally posted by: coop039

originally posted by: PsychicCroMag
a reply to: Vroomfondel Germans can not criticize their government. One "refugee" from Germany has no job, 3 wives, 23 children and receives $ 400k/yr welfare payments. How long can a nation survive such insanity? ( said hes not home much he likes to travel)

WTF? Source? That cant be right?!
Good golly, I thought our system here was screwed up.

Why expect a source from a poster who is clearly trolling?

400k/yr, lol, you're going to be waiting a long time to find a source for that one.

A saw a post about how ATS has turned into anti-Muslim rhetoric 24/7 and didn't think much of it, but it was removed by the mods.

..... yet posts like that one, aren't. The writing is on the wall.

a reply to: heavymental

Your first link about england refers to an attempt at Sharia patrols by a handful of idiots that resulted in prison for those involved.

idiots jailed

Hardly no go.

originally posted by: skalla
a reply to: heavymental

Your first link about england refers to an attempt at Sharia patrols by a handful of idiots that resulted in prison for those involved.

idiots jailed

Hardly no go.

Ah so it became a no-go zone for the idiots that tried to make it a no-go zone. Seems fair.

a reply to: RomeByFire

Germany: Muslim Migrant with Four Wives and 23 Children Receives $390,000 a Year in Benefits

source

a reply to: RomeByFire

A couple of things you assumed or just missed.

First. I was responding to RomeByFire's comment that there are no No Go Zones in America.

Second. The Title of this post is "8 more areas in Sweden added to list of so-called 'no-go zones’".

My post had nothing to do with "imaginary Muslim no-go zones".

If you were being logical and rational you would have realized that I never spoke of any race, religion, or culture in my post. That was you either projecting or making assumptions. My post was not about Muslims or white people.

If you were thinking logically, it would seem apparent that most people that live in those areas are accepted in those areas. A large enough number of the residents in those communities are hostile to outsiders, that it is only asking for trouble to go into one without escort or invite. They don't want you there, and you would be stupid to go where it has been made clear that you are not wanted, without a darn good reason. Proving you machismo may be a good enough reason for you. It is not for most logical and rational people.

The city doesn't cordon off these areas because people are dying to get in. Most of the people in those areas are dying to get out. For many in these areas, life has little meaning, your life if you run up on the wrong person, has even less meaning. But it does have value if it bolsters someone's machismo and puts a notch on their belt.

As you have shared machismo is king on the street.

originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: RomeByFire

Germany: Muslim Migrant with Four Wives and 23 Children Receives $390,000 a Year in Benefits

source

You must be on the source if you believe that website you linked

originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: RomeByFire

Germany: Muslim Migrant with Four Wives and 23 Children Receives $390,000 a Year in Benefits

source

Your source which is briebart uses a German tabloid as a source, now here is the wiki on this German tabloid

Bild has been described as "notorious for its mix of gossip, inflammatory language, and sensationalism" and as having a huge influence on German politicians

Now from your briebart source it says and I quote

The estimated sum of 360 thousand euros per year comes from a German financial manager who posted the figure on the website of the “Association of Employers” as an approximative calculation of what the German state would be paying for the whole family

How can we take that sensationalized journalism seriously ?

a reply to: Whereismypassword

Yeah, you're right, Snopes debunked this, cause you know, they couldn't prove exactly how much the Syrian economic migrant with 4 wives and 23 children would take in. It was an estimate only.
Snopes

In other words, Königsstein estimated how much a man with four wives and 23 children might receive in social benefits in Germany, not how much this specific refugee actually received.

A municipality spokesperson told German news service Deutsche Welle that this is not how benefits work in Germany: the country’s laws prohibit polygamy and do not allow someone to receive benefits for multiple families. Rather, Ghazia A. would have to select one wife and her respective children to be eligible for social assistance. However, the rest of his wives could apply for benefits on their own.

Eventually the native Swedes will have no safe areas.Reminds me of the demise of the Native Americans.

a reply to: D8Tee
Yea I'm with the 2nd replyer. Europe was demolished in WW2 and then rebuilt,but a few million refugees is what is going to destroy Europe? C'mon man, they're a bunch of poor hungry people, I don't think any of theses European countries have to worry about tanks rolling into their country, because that's a real crisis. Something Americans don't have to fear: an actual land invasion.