Comey May Have Perjured Himself on May 3

a reply to: introvert

I think I may have. I'll reread.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

a reply to: introvert

He said that he shared his personal, unclassified memos, which he has every right to do.

He also said he wrote them in a way so they would not be classified, so that the information would be sharable (to those not authorized to see classified material).

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: MotherMayEye

a reply to: introvert

He said that he shared his personal, unclassified memos, which he has every right to do.

He also said he wrote them in a way so they would not be classified, so that the information would be sharable (to those not authorized to see classified material).

Indeed he did.

It is very similar to politicians that publish books after they leave office. They talk about situations they were part of, but cannot reveal anything classified.

Interestinger and intrestinger...

Team Trump might show "trail" of Comey leaks...

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: MotherMayEye

a reply to: introvert

He said that he shared his personal, unclassified memos, which he has every right to do.

He also said he wrote them in a way so they would not be classified, so that the information would be sharable (to those not authorized to see classified material).

Indeed he did.

It is very similar to politicians that publish books after they leave office. They talk about situations they were part of, but cannot reveal anything classified.

If it was written on FBI time or used its resources it is classified internally per their employment agreements. COmey giving it out and then denying he did in the past when asked was a crime.

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: MotherMayEye

a reply to: introvert

He said that he shared his personal, unclassified memos, which he has every right to do.

He also said he wrote them in a way so they would not be classified, so that the information would be sharable (to those not authorized to see classified material).

Indeed he did.

It is very similar to politicians that publish books after they leave office. They talk about situations they were part of, but cannot reveal anything classified.

If it was written on FBI time or used its resources it is classified internally per their employment agreements. COmey giving it out and then denying he did in the past when asked was a crime.

Sorry. No matter what you think, he did not reveal classified info and he is entitled to his own intellectual property.

originally posted by: rickymouse
This issue may arise because someone gets a little confused during their questioning. It is possible a mistake was made by comey. It is kind of stressful and with stress sometimes you get mixed up a bit, not completely understanding the question.

For perjury you need to have been lying willfully, mixed up does not count most times. Anyone being questioned can make mistakes, that happens a lot. You have to know you are not telling the truth in order for it to be perjury. If the info you were led to believe is not real, you are just a fool, not a perjurer.

He was pretty specific in his timeline and how he awoke in the middle of the night thinking about a tweet that didn't exist yet. Guy's either clairvoyant or full of #

Comey's conversations with Trump and the subsequent
timeline of leaks fits - a perfect puzzle piece.

a reply to: jordan77

He is still the ultimate source. The memos are from him, not from his friend.

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: whyamIhere

You really tortured the language.

No. I simply paid attention to the specific words he was asked.

The Man cost your precious demon the Election.

I was not a Hillary supporter.

You couldn't believe he injected himself into the Election

Actually, I was one of the few that supported what he did during the election, whether it hurt Hillary or not.

Now, he represents truth and honor.

Yes, he is a honorable man. Shame he has become part of the mess.

You are a hypocrite.

No. You are projecting things other people have said on to me.

If you want to disagree with me, that's fine. But don't be dishonest and just make crap up.

Why can't you reply to anyone who disagrees with you without this ?

You can't reply with a complete thought ?

Quit breaking down everyone's posts to weasel out of answering.

You didn't support Hillary, and I won Top Gun last year.

a reply to: whyamIhere

Why can't you reply to anyone who disagrees with you without this ? You can't reply with a complete thought ? Quit breaking down everyone's posts to weasel out of answering.

I am answering your very specific claims, which are false. If you don't want me to respond, don't reply to me or make false claims about me.

You didn't support Hillary, and I won Top Gun last year.

Sure. I can prove my claim, can you?

originally posted by: jordan77
Well, technically, he wasnt the anonymous source, the professor friend he told was.

True but...
He ORDERED his friend to get in the papers.

Once it got out of his circle, he is the source of the leak.

Hard to refute when comey admitted to everything.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: MotherMayEye

a reply to: introvert

He said that he shared his personal, unclassified memos, which he has every right to do.

He also said he wrote them in a way so they would not be classified, so that the information would be sharable (to those not authorized to see classified material).

Indeed he did.

It is very similar to politicians that publish books after they leave office. They talk about situations they were part of, but cannot reveal anything classified.

If it was written on FBI time or used its resources it is classified internally per their employment agreements. COmey giving it out and then denying he did in the past when asked was a crime.

Sorry. No matter what you think, he did not reveal classified info and he is entitled to his own intellectual property.

HAHAHAHA!! ATS has a policy similiar to the FBI here. All content/intellctual property here(minus copyrighted materials) is the property of the above network.
Comey denied EVER leaking anything May 3rd. and his newer testimony showed he did lie. cant you ever compare his testimonies?
SO No he isnt entitled to anything made on or using FBI resources. Pens,paper,computers(minus personal) chairs to sit in,tables to write on,and a office to do so. if he used ANY of it its FBI property. Go try to argue this in court and the judge will laugh at you after citing the COntract comey agreed to.

Though leaking stuffs may not be illegal in Comey's case, it sure as heck don't look good on him. It makes him seem like he's not responsible to anyone but himself.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: TSefu

originally posted by: introvert
No, he did not perjure himself.

He did not act as an anonymous source leaking info to the media and he did not ask anyone at the FBI to be an anonymous source.

Did he perjure himself when he claimed he leaked the memo to the NYT in response to a specific Trump Tweet? A tweet that it turned out was written a day after the NYT got the memo

There is a lot of context to that we simply do not know. It's quite possible that his friend gave the NYT the memos and told them to wait for their say-so to release them. So they have it in their hands, but do not release them until Comey sees the Trump tweet and gives the thumbs-up to his friend.

Except in that scenario the leak did not happen because of the tweet.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: TSefu

originally posted by: introvert
No, he did not perjure himself.

He did not act as an anonymous source leaking info to the media and he did not ask anyone at the FBI to be an anonymous source.

Did he perjure himself when he claimed he leaked the memo to the NYT in response to a specific Trump Tweet? A tweet that it turned out was written a day after the NYT got the memo

There is a lot of context to that we simply do not know. It's quite possible that his friend gave the NYT the memos and told them to wait for their say-so to release them. So they have it in their hands, but do not release them until Comey sees the Trump tweet and gives the thumbs-up to his friend.

Except in that scenario the leak did not happen because of the tweet.

Except the data that was leaked by comeys was being held by his friend and released when his friend was given a signal tweet. Bro do you even espionage?
His friend would had never leaked anything unless he was given something by Comey. He supplied it. he is the master leaker of it.

a reply to: yuppa

I don't know what that has to do with the fact the Trump tweet can't be the reason Comey gave it to his friend.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: yuppa

I don't know what that has to do with the fact the Trump tweet can't be the reason Comey gave it to his friend.

The fact he prolly supplied it before the tweet most likely and told him to wait until trump made a tweet on that subject. To throw off suspicion.

I know a easy way to solve this. come down hard on the friend and turn him against Comey. prosecutor threatens his friend with 5o years in prison or something.

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: yuppa

I don't know what that has to do with the fact the Trump tweet can't be the reason Comey gave it to his friend.

The fact he prolly supplied it before the tweet most likely and told him to wait until trump made a tweet on that subject. To throw off suspicion.

I know a easy way to solve this. come down hard on the friend and turn him against Comey. prosecutor threatens his friend with 5o years in prison or something.

Except we know he gave it before the tweet. It's not probably supplied it, it's a fact he supplied it before the tweet. So Comey appears to have lied.

a reply to: yuppa

ATS has a policy similiar to the FBI here. All content/intellctual property here(minus copyrighted materials) is the property of the above network.

Incorrect comparison.

While ATS does also retain intellectual rights to members' original posted content, members do not lose their intellectual property rights to original content. Members only loses the "exclusivity" of those rights; therefore, you retain the rights to your original work to do as you see fit, but ATS may also use that work; hence, nonexclusive.

***As an aside, all original content created by anyone is automatically copyrighted, even if not registered with the copyright office.

See also