DOJ Charges Federal Contractor For Leaking Classified Materials

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Am I wrong...or does it appear the starving Deep State has begun eating it's seed corn over this Russia narrative?

Yep.

They really have no loyalty but to themselves.

They use the "causes" for publicity.

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: IAMTAT


So many conveniently chose to ignore that.
Even go so far as to say that Vault 7 is fake.

The Russian hacking mimic is clearly in use extensively by the CIA and others.
Certainly Crowdstrike, despite whatever suspicions they may have had, chose to ignore it as a possibility.

Mark my words...this girl ends up 'suicided' in the very near future.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Yes. Possibly Crowdstrike knew, and used it as a set up.

More good information here just up from Zero Hedge

www.zerohedge.com...

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: IAMTAT



More good information here just up from Zero Hedge

www.zerohedge.com...

Interesting. The article suggests 'VR Systems' as the name of the 'masked' manufacturer.
Remember competitor in other states is SmartMatic...a Soros-linked company.

VR's website says EViD products were used in California, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, North Carolina, New York and Virginia

www.zerohedge.com...

SmartMatic, a UK based company, is a George Soros linked company that has provided voting technology in 16 states including battleground zones like Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Virginia.

www.nowtheendbegins.com...



WHY target non-Soros systems?

I just watched this vid that was very interesting ...Need a school play to address a crisis ...who you going to call

originally posted by: queenofswords

originally posted by: xuenchen
Oh No !!

Here come the heart warming stories...........

Mom Shocked at Daughter's Arrest for Leaking Secrets

Oh justice.. stay thy rod and be gentle as ye can with her punishment.
Im referencing a quote i heard one time about how females get lesser punishments.

But this one deserves a public execution. also for a week up till her execution she should be put in stocks outside and ridiculed and spit on for treason.

a reply to: burntheships

Some great comments to that article.

My fave probably being, 'Standard Disclaimer: I'm only surprised her first name wasn't "Patsy".'

a reply to: burntheships

From that article:

She speaks speaks Pashto, Farsi & Dari. I wonder if she learned these languages in the military.

originally posted by: burntheships

a reply to: jadedANDcynical
Ah. Apparently her printer gave her away.

I thought most people knew that a lot of modern printers would rat you out with tracking dots.

Kim Dotcom tonight on Twitter

Why believe NSA on Russian hacking in a cyberwar that allows any actor to make any attack look like someone else did it? Maybe @CIA did it.

twitter.com...

Her names Reality Winner?



What a stupid name!


Bet she is ghetto trash with a name like that!

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

She made a sort of riddleish comment before
The election. "This Tuesday when we become
The United States of The Russian Federation"

Cryptic... Did she know something then?

This has CIA stink all over it.

This doc was probably manufactured for a completely other purpose (Discrediting VR Systems in certain states under a Hillary Clinton administration).
Why?...So alternative Soros-owned Smartmatic machines can be put into place for 2020.

After Hillary lost...the doc. was retasked for this.
This idealistic girl is absolutely a Deep State CIA patsy.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Looks like it, what is really interesting
Wikileaks just put up a 10k reward for
the name of the Intercept reporter that
Perhaps unintentionally gave her identity
away.

ETA: I'm thinking the timing of the Intercept
Article is really suspect now.

And still no official name vouching for the
Intercept "leak"

a reply to: burntheships

I wonder why Intercept...and this reporter.
Why not CNN, NYT, WAPO, ...or MSNBC?

She was directed...and intentionally 'burned' in order to produce an actual source revealed concurrently with the revelation.
Adds more gravitas to the story.

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: IAMTAT

Looks like it, what is really interesting
Wikileaks just put up a 10k reward for
the name of the Intercept reporter that
Perhaps unintentionally gave her identity
away.

So WL, that believes in maintaining anonymity, will pay to out someone. What is going on. Payback?

a reply to: roadgravel

Assange is probably shocked at how the Intercept so easily betayed their source and handed her over on a silver platter.

It is bad for the leaking business.

Winner is very likely just a useful idiot, like so many of the easily manipulated Trump Haters.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: burntheships

I wonder why Intercept...and this reporter.
Why not CNN, NYT, WAPO, ...or MSNBC?

She was directed...and intentionally 'burned' in order to produce an actual source revealed concurrently with the revelation.
Adds more gravitas to the story.

The magazine serves as a platform to report on the documents released by Edward Snowden in the short term, and to "produce aggressive, adversarial journalism across a wide range of issues" in the long term.

en.wikipedia.org...


Burntheships said:

Looks like it, what is really interesting
Wikileaks just put up a 10k reward for
the name of the Intercept reporter that
Perhaps unintentionally gave her identity
away.

Maybe Wikileaks considers them "competition" and would really really like to know who is receiving all the "good" stuff nowadays.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: burntheships

I wonder why Intercept...and this reporter.
Why not CNN, NYT, WAPO, ...or MSNBC?

Wondering that same thing.

Ok, the list is too long, but my first
"Hair up" on my arm is she had a clearance.

She spoke many languages, She is intelligent.

Did she really mail an original copy?
I'm stuck on that.

She was directed...and intentionally 'burned' in order to produce an actual source revealed concurrently with the revelation.

This makes a lot of sense.