Vladimir Putin sends message to globalists via Megyn Kelly about election interference allegations

a reply to: 123143

What is your problem? Did she whip out a boob or something?
She's wearing a very popular cold shoulder style blouse that shows, oh my, her shoulders. There is nothing immodest about it. It has a very high neckline and long sleeves and she's wearing pants. Fully covered head to foot.
If she had a sleeveless turtle neck on would you say anything? The same amount of skin would be showing. More even as this blouse has long sleeves.
Should she be wearing burlap and no makeup?

a reply to: Sublimecraft
"Look at your colleagues, what they are doing here,"

"Your colleagues" is clearly speaking about the MAIN STREAM MEDIA. CNN, MSNBC, CBS etc including FOX are all globalist corporations or as they were once called Multi-National Corporations because they are active around the world not just in the US. They are all part of the Globalist/One World Movement that wrote such drivel as the "Paris Accord" and the UN and all those in NATO are nothing more than globalist one government puppets under the control of the UBER ELITE.

Does anyone remember the start of it in the Media? It was advertisement jingles like "I want to buy the world a Coke and be one be family". Now it is gone from Jingles to Accords. One generations jingles are the next generations policies.

originally posted by: stosh64
a reply to: Sublimecraft

I am embarrassed for Megan, she sure fits right in with NBC.

Putin, "the problem lies within America". "Your 3 yr old could have done this"

I couldn't agree more.

That made all of us Americans look like idiots.

The problem I see here is narcissism which is a plague currently going about. Many dont want to look in the mirror as the source of the problem. He is correct, the problem is within, and you can narrow down that phrase to mean many different things. It is a powerful statement that underlines the heart of the problem; selfishness. Selfish- worship of self and not listening to others (or your surroundings) leaves one blind to the events occurring around. (no thanks to mainstream Media mind programmings)

Wanna know what the apocalypse actually means? It means unveiling/ revealing. Which is why the chapter in the bible called apocalypse was later called the book of revelation.

The lies are being exposed as we speak and in more ways than one.

I do agree we need Unity, but not under government, but rather unity to fight against Globalism. Unfortunately the globalists have infiltrated everywhere including these forums with their minions. Noone wants to talk about it, but those with eyes that see know full well who they are.

It is an information war and we are all smacked inside the middle of it.

Their tactic is to exhaust their opponents. No matter how much logic you throw at them, they will not change because their intent is something else. The ends justifies the means in the eyes of the globalists.

a reply to: Spacespider

You missed the point. Next time it will be the right that gets attacked and then it will be a completely different story . Then republicans will be all up in arms wanting action.
Like they want the white house leakers now. The content isn't important ...getting the leakers is.
At the DNC it was all about the content never mind who may have done the hack.

I see the hypocrisy there. Don't you?

originally posted by: 123143
Why is she dressed like a common tart to interview one of the most powerful men in the world? Is she looking for a date?

is that what women are to you "Tarts"? What a sexist remark. She looked respectful and spoke dignified.

I bet you would have women in Burka's and not allowed to drive or speak to men.

a reply to: burntheships

I'm not talking about those emails. I'm talking about pedestas emails.
They were confused with her server issue and Comeys pubic indictment of her actions.
People thought they were the same thing.
Her emails from the state department were released as part of the pubic record not to embarrass Mrs. Clinton.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

How does that invalidate their findings xuechen?

What "findings" ?

There's no proof they "found" anything.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: burntheships

I'm not talking about those emails. I'm talking about pedestas emails.
They were confused with her server issue and Comeys pubic indictment of her actions.
People thought they were the same thing.
Her emails from the state department were released as part of the pubic record not to embarrass Mrs. Clinton.

All the Clinton emails were released by court orders after long battles to suppress them.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Clinton is confusing her followers by saying they went after he private email ACCOUNT, when in fact it was about her private INTERNET PROVIDER SERVER. She was using an IP address which did not match that of the US.gov so she could not get caught taking illegal funds from Russia, Soros, Islamic Countries with interests not the same as the US, and many private international corporations with a globalist agenda.

a reply to: 123143

Dumb blond?
Why ?
She was very professional. Very polite informed and asked valid questions.
Also you should know that was only an excerpt from the full interview which won't be aired until 7PM this evening.
I think you hate women or have an idea that we've over stepped our bounds in this man's world.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

Oh give me a break.
Secret payments from Russia. Shakes head. More really bad conspiracy theories.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

The lyrics were "I want to buy the world a coke and keep it company. "
And that was a commercial for soda that used a popular song that had nothing to do with soda titled
" I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing...."

a reply to: Sillyolme

my point still stands, Coke is a Multi-naitonal globalist corporation that is behind and supportive of the Globalist agenda as found in the Paris accord.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Oh I see you are a HIlliarite.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Sublimecraft

No evidence of Russian interference clearly shows how well they are at covering up the evidence of their interference.

No evidence of Crooked Hillary having Seth Rich killed clearly shows how well she is at covering up the evidence that she had it done.

a reply to: DonInHtown

easy to be done when you using a email and your own private IP server.

originally posted by: underwerks
So we're trusting and applauding Vladimir Putin now..

Seems legit.

I'd also like to give a shout out to the Russian intelligence services. Because of you, Russia has finally beat the U.S.

Not through any military means, but by using American's own nationalistic idiocy against them. I think we got the wrong Nazi scientists during Paperclip...

Go to Russia and lecture the Russians about Patriotism. You will get your head kicked in. They love their country, wtf is wrong with that? You evidently hate yours...

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: 123143

What is your problem? Did she whip out a boob or something?
She's wearing a very popular cold shoulder style blouse that shows, oh my, her shoulders. There is nothing immodest about it. It has a very high neckline and long sleeves and she's wearing pants. Fully covered head to foot.
If she had a sleeveless turtle neck on would you say anything? The same amount of skin would be showing. More even as this blouse has long sleeves.
Should she be wearing burlap and no makeup?

You failed to properly read through the thread. I corrected myself later that the video I saw was a different one.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: 123143

Dumb blond?
Why ?
She was very professional. Very polite informed and asked valid questions.
Also you should know that was only an excerpt from the full interview which won't be aired until 7PM this evening.
I think you hate women or have an idea that we've over stepped our bounds in this man's world.

I'm a woman, Einstein.

Putin 2.0 - Hilary and all it's croonies = - 0.2

a reply to: 123143

I must have missed your retraction.
Why take yet another jab at me because I didn't see a different post. I was replying to the one where you called her a tart and asked if she was looking for a date.
And it's worse that you said that and you're a woman.