It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Reverbs
a reply to: TEOTWAWKIAIFF
Yea. I made my life as simple as possible to have time to smell the roses. including almost nobody except my family knows my phone number. I lost my umbrella at a girls house. i think. but she deleted her facebook. so thats that haha. never exchanged numbers. I dont like the social tether.
its nice with you guys though.
Im not sure if this is random or what but I was kinda thinking about buying a stainless, a non stick and a vacuum just a few hours ago. hahaha.. mostly the vacuum.
I enjoyed the storm. and its something people dont get. i worked my ass off. then i got stormed on in the wind. i drank a beer in the rain. then i put on dry yummy clothes.
mmmm. I walked for an hour cold and wet.
best night in weeks.
but i imagine 95% of everyone else would feel so negative by the busy day and the weather and just everything attacking..
the guy at the gas station knows me and knows how far i walk. He legit asked me how i was going to get home. like it was now impossible. "Ill take a shower on the way.."
Beautiful. the lightning kept lighting up the water splashing back up into the air and the drops falling down and the grass and tree leaves like almost going to the music in my ear. 9/10 would do again.
Always good to hear from you brother.
"The rabbit runs faster than the fox, because the rabbit is running for his life while the fox is only running for his dinner." Aesop[24] The predator-prey relationship can also be established in the microbial world, producing the same evolutionary phenomenon that occurs in the case of foxes and rabbits. A recently observed example has as protagonists M.xanthus (predator) and E.coli (prey) in which a parallel evolution of both species can be observed through genomic and phenotypic modifications, producing in future generations a better adaptation of one of the species that is counteracted by the evolution of the other, thus generating an arms race that can only be stopped by the extinction of one of the species.[25]
Barnosky's 2001 paper that was one of the first to introduce the term,[2] explains what the Court Jester hypothesis means, describing it as one side of a debate over:
"[W]hether this march of morphology and species compositions through time, so well documented not only for mammals but throughout the fossil record, is more strongly influenced by interactions among species (Red Queen hypotheses), or by random perturbations to the physical environment such as climate change, tectonic events, or even bolide impacts that change the ground rules for the biota (Court Jester hypotheses). . . . A class of alternative ideas, here termed Court Jester hypotheses, share the basic tenet that changes in the physical environment rather than biotic interactions themselves are the initiators of major changes in organisms and ecosystems. . . . Court Jester hypotheses imply that events random in respect to the biota occasionally change the rules on the biotic playing field. Accelerated biotic response (relative to background rates) is the result."
The Red Queen hypothesis (focusing on evolution by biotic interactions) and Court Jester hypothesis (focusing on evolution by abiotic factors such as stochastic environmental perturbations) both influence coevolutionary switching in host-parasite interaction.[10] Barnosky acknowledges in the 2001 paper[2] that the Court Jester hypothesis is not necessarily inconsistent with the Red Queen hypothesis:
"Indeed, as Ned Johnson remarked (after listening to a lecture expressing these ideas), ‘‘Maybe it is time for the Court Jester to marry the Red Queen.’’ That is, perhaps the dichotomy between the two hypotheses is really a dichotomy of scale, and that as we look for ways to travel across biological levels, we will find ways to resolve the dichotomies."