BREAKING: U.S. O-U-T of Paris Climate Accord

If anything the global elite benefit from the agreement not the opposite. They own the largest of Corporations and those companies of scale can crush competition when regulatory costs rise. That and the elite play a longer game. They're willing to let other economies grow at the expense of the American worker because they want the markets. Look at the corporations that are in support. It's the hollywood squares of cheap labor and offshore mfg.

A 1.5° extra won't affect "us" that much
But in the sub-Sahara...

drought will become more recurrent
crops will fail, famine will ensue
more demand for humanitarian aid
more images of malnourished and potbellied infants

more demands for donations
(from you and me)

The money doanted from us
will only encourage gvts to shirk their responsabilities...

Oh yeah, let's not forget
the 'famine refuges' will have to be taken in somewhere

but but but ...

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

It's insane how little knowledge you have about the Paris agreement, and you try to compensate that by acting all dramatic...

In case you hadn't noticed by now, Trump is exposing the globalists, and their agenda to earn money trough climate-mongering...

The 38% of the US steel industry that woukd have been cut would have gone straight to china were there is far less environmental regulation and far more pollution.

How was that supposed to be good for the environment?

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Never would have thought ATS would side with the elite

I believe that your views on the Paris Accord are based on lies and manipulation by the elite

originally posted by: micpsi

The Paris agreement was never about science. It was about transferring money from the USA to other countries so as to weaken it. Carbon dioxide emissions have very little effect on global temperatures. The claim that it does is unproven. Global warming is just a scam for companies to make huge amounts of money.

This is the perfect phrasing of what conservatives think. They are in denial. As the century progresses and the climate continues to change, it will become more and more obvious to the point they will have to change their stance.

So some of the changes by 2050 include a 7-degree Fahrenheit average temperature increase, an increase in hurricanes and hurricane strength, greater storm surges, and an increase in rainfall for some regions while other regions would experience extreme drought.

originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

It's insane how little knowledge you have about the Paris agreement, and you try to compensate that by acting all dramatic...

In case you hadn't noticed by now, Trump is exposing the globalists, and their agenda to earn money trough climate-mongering...

He is truly one of us. Twitter is already going ballistic. This is just awesome. Half of these idiots even needed to google paris climate agreement accord. Elon Musk is out. Good i never trusted that guy.

a reply to: Khaleesi

Attention!

This is NOT the Political Mud Pit forum!

Political trolling, name calling and insults will NOT be tolerated.

Do not reply to this post.

a reply to: Perfectenemy

Elon Musk is out. Good i never trusted that guy.

That guy has been stealing more taxpayer dollars than anyone in the history of this world.

a reply to: whywhynot

So are yours. Seems like they never really lose.

a reply to: Damiel

Is that your prophecy, or do you have some evidence to back those claims?

The world was a very different place during the equable climates of the Cretaceous and the Paleogene. While the tropics maintained relatively stable temperatures (Zachos, 1994; Pearson et al., 2001), the high-latitudes were much warmer than they are currently, and greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, existed in significantly higher concentrations too (Sluijs, 2006).

www.seas.harvard.edu...

Scientists can't even create models to explain equable climate periods, periods in which co2 levels were much higher, but who needs facts when pushing the climate agenda.

originally posted by: Deny Arrogance
The 38% of the US steel industry that woukd have been cut would have gone straight to china were there is far less environmental regulation and far more pollution.

How was that supposed to be good for the environment?

You are thinking again.

Don't think.

a reply to: GodEmperor
Well, no, no prophecy from me
Does the Ethiopian 'thing' ring any bells with you ?

a reply to: TinfoilTP

Watch for cries of impeachment ramp up higher than ever.

This is NOT the Mud Pit!!!

All rules for polite political debate will be enforced.
Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (REVISED)
Go After the Ball, Not the Player!

You are responsible for your own posts.



and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!

a reply to: Damiel

movement of tectonic plates that created the Mediterranean Sea and the Alps also sparked the drying of the Sahara some 7 million years ago, according to the latest computer simulations of Earth’s ancient climate.

www.smithsonianmag.com...

Maybe you should reconsider your understanding of climate, especially in regards to predictions. If 1.5 degree rise in global temperatures cause tectonic plates to suddenly shift and turn places into desert, well I would like to see your evidence please.

In fact:

Scientists are now seeing signals that the Sahara desert and surrounding regions are greening due to increasing rainfall.

news.nationalgeographic.com...

I guess your predictions are anti-science.

I think the US is one of only 3 to 6 countries not in the agreement now?

It doesn't seem good to pull out of the agreement...follow the money. Large US based corporations have the most to gain by the US pulling out of the agreement. Big Coal, Gas, Oil, Auto Manufacturers, fracking companies, entrenched power companies in every state, steel companies, huge concrete companies.

It seems in essence that Trump caved to big corporations and the corporate welfare state. That's part of the true global elite.

I may be wrong, but this doesn't seem good.