It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Ghostsinthefog
I'm new and learning the correct categories.
ADMIN - please move to the correct one if you feel this one isn't correct; this way I'll also learn.
I'm interested in cults and the followers;
I decided secret societies but was a toss between this one, people and religious conspiries.
Anyhow I'm rambling.
Charlie Manson, we all know the story, heard the testimonies from past members, listened to his strange ramblings from prison.
However, Charlie Manson himself didn't kill anyone himself, and evidence supporting that he manipulated people to kill for him is...somewhat irrelivent(?). He never went with them, at any point they could have turned around and stopped; but didn't. They committed the murders knowing what they were doing.
Now my question and first post to the ATS group is this. Why is he still serving more time than some murders and rapists have, will obviously never be given parole and from what I can see isn't a danger to anyone.
So your thoughts. Should Manson be freed by now? Do you see and agree he should be incarirated?
Some have even said he would start a another cult (laughable). Would you even call his group a cult?
Thanks all
originally posted by: SpeakerofTruth
a reply to: midnightstar
I find many people's opinion of him rather amusing, especially given how little they know about him, which you discover with any lengthy discussion. I know it sounds like I am "defending" him... I'm not. I just have looked deeper into the whole Manson "phenomena" than some have.
Part of what led me to look into it was because I have always been intrigued by the fact that some individuals seem to have the ability to hold an influence over others. I have always wondered what it is about these individuals that was so "alluring." So, I tend to look into these types of individuals deeper than some people do.
www.latimes.com...
originally posted by: SpeakerofTruth
a reply to: Ghostsinthefog
Well, hell, he sort of did get a "raw deal." Hell, he wasn't even allowed to testify in his own trial because the prosecution claimed he'd "hypnotize the jurors." Don't believe me? Look into it. You'll see.
Was he guilty of manipulation? Certainly. He had those at his ranch convinced he was "special." However, I have always been more interested in what he had to say than what he did, soooo...
originally posted by: SpeakerofTruth
a reply to: Ghostsinthefog
Well, hell, he sort of did get a "raw deal." Hell, he wasn't even allowed to testify in his own trial because the prosecution claimed he'd "hypnotize the jurors." Don't believe me? Look into it. You'll see.
Was he guilty of manipulation? Certainly. He had those at his ranch convinced he was "special." However, I have always been more interested in what he had to say than what he did, soooo...
Now my question and first post to the ATS group is this. Why is he still serving more time than some murders and rapists have, will obviously never be given parole and from what I can see isn't a danger to anyone.