Russian Once Tied to Trump Aide Seeks Immunity to Cooperate With Congress

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: yuppa

I'm not saying to charge anyone without cause. But past history shows connections and past actions. Usually you can know what someone will do in the future by what they've done in the past. You can establish patterns of behavior, who they know and their involvement, etc.

All important information to have even if it in itself isn't directly what you're looking for.

So those people who turn their lives around are going to do the same things again right? No the past does not dictate the e future unless you want it to do so. past connection does not mean a future one.

originally posted by: Moresby

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: aethertek
a reply to: antoinemarionette

I think the "leaks" are coming from the FBI,

Not just the FBI.

Trump & his cohorts are just arrogant spoiled rich brats who thought they could pull this off.
Did they really think that the men & woman who have dedicated their lives to protect this country & it's interest would just lay down & accept this seditious coup attempt.

& Flynn, what an example of failing upward, gotta be a poster child for the Peter Principle.
How dumb does he have to be given his former position not to realize that his contacts & communication would be noticed.

K~

I think you have coup backwards here. But in your eyes its correct. another case of Confirmation bias.

I don't think you understand the meaning of either of those terms.

The your avatar must reflect life more than you let on.

a reply to: olaru12

"Oleg V. Deripaska, a Russian oligarch..."

Why does a Russian oligarch want immunity from our Congress?

Immunity from what? Sorry, I don't get it.

Ok, listen up. If there was anything solid to go on Trump would have been shut down from the get go. Everybody, and I do mean everybody, is watched like a hawk. The average person is monitored. Trump could have been shut down during the election if they had anything concrete, hence all of the anonymous sources. What you smell cooking is government hash of the alphabet agency sort. Can people not recognize this having seen it so many times?

What you do is hammer away at the same old story in an unrelenting manner. The goal is to form the story in the consciousness of Americans. The human brain is a very "subjective" thing and at some point acceptance is given. Then they can threaten Trump with whatever they want. They just want to rule us like cattle, like they always have. How dare the cattle want to be free. The alphabet agencies are gonna show us.... Grrrr.....

How? TSA is seizing cigarette lighters, nail clippers, and all electronic devices. If the terrace can even board a flight, do you think TSA will allow munitions in the luggage?

If so, they'll probably kill Canadians first, since the terrace are welcome there. Besides, in Canada, they can blow dope legally at strippers, buy boxcutters, get handouts, and work if they want, without fear of being incarcerated before their big boom gig, so why come to Amerika again?

Why not blow up the infidels there instead?

An infidel's an infidel.

Now if you're worried about terrace killing mericans when war resumes, I suppose you have a point. Somehow, I think, we can deal with it. Always Remember: location location location. But this time, we had better not use Tomahawks again, because whilst browsing furious ape! on tumblr, a vintage porn and comic site, I just read that Trump holds stock in Raytheon.++ Don't you know what they'll do to him?

They'll crucify the bastard.

a reply to: olaru12

# 787

a reply to: TheWhiteKnight

Not sure why you zeroed in on Canadians. They do a fantastic job of vetting, and integration. I don't know why they are not the model for how to do it, they do an awesome job.

It's a welcome mat for everyone. Don't forget...Canada is the crown, and the super rich and progs want a one world government. That is why Trump is hated.

Equality of ashes and penultimate powers of governance.

You are against borders, as I recall. You called them rules. Who needs rules, right?
Don't make me drag up the thread.

a reply to: angeldoll

# 788

a reply to: olaru12

Obamas gone, Hillary lost, why the obsession to deflect Trumps problems with the past.

Because that's all they have. That, and calling everything fake that doesn't fit with their narrative.

Ok, listen up. If there was anything solid to go on Trump would have been shut down from the get go. Everybody, and I do mean everybody, is watched like a hawk. The average person is monitored. Trump could have been shut down during the election if they had anything concrete, hence all of the anonymous sources. What you smell cooking is government hash of the alphabet agency sort. Can people not recognize this having seen it so many times?

a reply to: Apollumi

Oh but I do recognize it! This is like a government infomercial, although I am surprised that more folks don't see what's coming. The only reason this much negative information is being trumpeted is to create an apparatus to smash and dismantle the wobbly sand castle that is the Trump administration... and it's already well underway.

He's probably trying to get broad immunity, for something he's done to break U.S. law... with a promise to say what they want to hear.

I would imagine even the Dems are suspicious of his motives... hell, he might just be looking for a pass on his own crimes, for reporting to the committee that he saw Kushner AND Trump jay-walking in NYC...

LOL

a reply to: olaru12

Sorry, but you just echoed yet another piece of MSM fake news :

‘NYT lies’: Russian tycoon denies demanding immunity to testify about Trump-Russia ties

Metals billionaire Oleg Deripaska has refuted a New York Times report claiming that he was prepared to reveal evidence of Russia’s election meddling to Congress in exchange for immunity from prosecution, saying instead that his testimony will clear the Kremlin.
In a statement issued by one of his companies, Basic Element, Deripaska said that the US newspaper’s May 27 article “was only correct in certain details, but in its essence a lie, designed to mislead.”

“The New York Times ‘story’ claims that I have inside information on Russia’s election interference, but I am not ready to make them public until I get immunity. Both of these statements are absolute lies,” wrote Deripaska, whose net worth is estimated at $5.2 billion by Forbes.

“The only truth in the article is that I do want to help the US Congress committees, acting on behalf of the American people, to establish the truth.”

Citing “three congressional officials, speaking on condition of anonymity,” the New York Times alleged that Deripaska’s purported offer was refused by US senators “because of concerns that immunity agreements create complications for federal criminal investigators.”

a reply to: theultimatebelgianjoke

That and Manafort was only campaign manager for a few months as well. But, yeah, typical MSM. When will everyone on here learn our MSM is a propaganda arm of the globalists which Trump is being smeared by?

a reply to: Missmissie173

Possibly he's scared Putin will suicide him if he spills beans on Putin Trump collusion so he wants Secret Service protection from Putin. Just my guess.

a reply to: olaru12

Well the outrageous news of leaks from unnamed sources is the bread and butter of the anti trump agenda camp.

Let them keep coming.

Another propagandized news.

originally posted by: whywhynot
a reply to: olaru12

I have to tell you the the NYTs and the WP have both produced such crappy reporting that I wouldn't believe them if they reported that is was cold in the winter. They and other media have done this to themselves in an attempt to remain relevant and financially liquid.

I am certain that some of their stories have some truth in them but I am unwilling to sort it out through all of the BS. So, for me i simply am done with them. Want to prove something? Show me real evidence or go home. The BS stops here

Absolutely. This is exactly what I have been saying in a lot of these threads. The unnamed sources are only as good as whoever is presenting them. And lately their credibility is shot to sheit.

So, like you said, put up or shut up.

a reply to: seeker1963

Hope they find out who the leaks are and have their asses arrested!

Talking to the press is not illegal. The investigation is not a state secret. You want the State to punish people who keep the public informed of what their government is doing? You are rooting for exactly the totalitarian State that you profess to oppose.

a reply to: DJW001

What can I say, fake news are the bread and butter of the anti Trump camp, keep them coming or they will starve.

a reply to: marg6043

Well the outrageous news of leaks from unnamed sources is the bread and butter of the anti trump agenda camp.

And attacking the credibility of their sources is the Trump cult's only defense. If the leaks are true, and there really isn't any reason to assume they are not, the truth will eventually come out with a resignation or impeachment. Stay tuned.

FAKE GNUS!

Sorry...

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: marg6043

Well the outrageous news of leaks from unnamed sources is the bread and butter of the anti trump agenda camp.

And attacking the credibility of their sources is the Trump cult's only defense. If the leaks are true, and there really isn't any reason to assume they are not, the truth will eventually come out with a resignation or impeachment. Stay tuned.

There is just as much reason to be skeptical about these anonymous sources as there is to believe them.

Start here: foreignpolicy.com...