It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: bknapple32
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Ive been respectful. Yet you underhandedly call me delusional.
I'll say again. The man who was in the room DID NOT SAY THE FOLLOWING:
"Potus did not reveal any classified info"
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: bknapple32
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Ive been respectful. Yet you underhandedly call me delusional.
I'll say again. The man who was in the room DID NOT SAY THE FOLLOWING:
"Potus did not reveal any classified info"
Was he supposed to say that?
originally posted by: Majic
a reply to: bknapple32
The problem with these stories is if they are true, then the sources are criminals disclosing classified information for public dissemination instead of notifying the proper authorities, such as inspectors general for the agencies involved. If they are false, then the sources are liars.
True or false, there is no case in which the motives behind these stories aren't sinister.
That's a very big problem, and sooner or later, the law is going to catch up with these people.
At no time were any intelligence sources or methods discussed and no military operations were disclosed that were not already known publicly,” said Army Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: bknapple32
Are you familiar with the stories of Chicken Little and the Boy Who Cried Wolf? The media apparently isn't. Since Trump took office, EVERYTHING has been a criminal crisis of unprecedented proportions. The result has been dilution of believability surrounding virtually every claim against Trump. Had the media picked their battles more judiciously, perhaps they'd still have some shred of give a damn left among the average American... but they didn't and behold! The fields in which we grow our damns are barren and without damns to give!
At this point I sincerely don't care if an accusation against him holds merit. The media has burned too many bridges and, frankly, their behavior and the behavior of the standard anti-Trumpers has made me completely apathetic to their consternation. I sort of hope some of the stories are true just for the joy of watching heads explode as they desperately try to tell us "no no, this time is different, these claims really are real" while absolutely nobody listens.
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: bknapple32
For all I know trump did do As the article says, and that is bad.
However, until I see proof one way or another, I will not rush to judgement.
I do know that at this point both political sides hate each other so much that they are not above lying or leaking info to make the other look bad, so I want to see proof before I make any judgements.
originally posted by: MysticPearl
It's standard operating procedure to reveal certain classified information with allies when working together on something, in this case with Russia against the terror threat. Classified info is regularly passed between nations fighting terrorism. Think Germany doesn't pass classified info onto France?
Please.
This whole thing is just "muuuuuuuu Russians". It's the idea it's somehow shameful to work with Russia against terrorism. Of course, I don't think the left actually believes that but rather, they're petulant little children who need to keep their evil Russian narrative going.
Investigators suspect Abdullahi Abdisalam Borleh, a Somali national, carried the laptop computer with a bomb in it onto Daallo Airlines Flight 159, the source said. The bomber knew precisely where to sit and how to place the device to maximize damage, the source told CNN. Given the placement, the blast likely would have set off a catastrophic secondary explosion in the fuel tank if the aircraft had reached cruising altitude, the source said.
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: bknapple32
For all I know trump did do As the article says, and that is bad.
However, until I see proof one way or another, I will not rush to judgement.
I do know that at this point both political sides hate each other so much that they are not above lying or leaking info to make the other look bad, so I want to see proof before I make any judgements.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: bknapple32
When the left stops rioting over someone just being invited to speak?