President Trump Fires James Comey

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: olaru12


AND THIS..


The fact that Trump chose to do this when Comey was in LA..
Not in person, not even by phone...But bizarrely by a letter in a manila envelope hand delivered by Trump goons (security guards from campaign) to FBI HQ in DC..

Comey found out by seeing it on the news..

THAT afforded Trumps people 24 hours to rifle through Comey's office at HQ and figure out what he might have in the investigation...By the time Comey got back to DC Trumps folks had already been through his office, locked him out of his PC, pulled all his access etc.

It was done by design to give Comey no heads up and while he was out of town so they could swoop in without him securing anything about Trump from the Russia Investigation.

hahahaha!

Any evidence of "desk rifling" or are you just in a bit of a tizz because there is no evidence to support your wild conspiracy theories?

It is the only explanation on the bizzare way this unfolded...no heads up, no call, waiting until Comey was out of town and then sending Trump's personal goon, Schiller to deliver a letter to comeys office in DC..While Comey was in LA...Schiller is a former NYC Detective that Trump has had on the payroll for years..Comey heard he was fired by seeing it on CNN..

Meanwhile, back at FBI headquarters, news was quickly spreading that Comey was being ushered out. Instead of delivering Trump's letter to Comey in person, Schiller deposited the document at his office.
Comey, in fact, wasn't at his agency's headquarters at all when Schiller arrived with the missive from the President; he was addressing agents at the FBI's Los Angeles field office when news came down that Trump had demanded his resignation.

Schiller and team had 24 hours to pack up Comeys office for him before he got back to DC...

This does not end well for Trump and team..
www.cnn.com...

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: talisman

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: 4N0M4LY
Yeap. As I saw as a reaction. All the hard core liberals, celebrities and democrat senators are thinking Trump should be investigated and impeached.....


I mean if Trump was trying to hide something and turned out to be true. I will even be shocked by it. But these people that are calling the president a traitor and corrupt need to take a chill pill and let the government sort itself out.

If Trump gets forcibly removed without some sort of due process or trial. There will be outrage for sure. You think triggered liberals are bad? You haven't seen ugly yet. Several constitutional patriotic groups are itching to have a reason to go to war.

If Trump WAS trying to hide something the very last thing he would do is make an enemy of the FBI Director investigating the bogus Russian claims.

That's just it. The Russians claims aren't bogus and a special prosecuter is being appointed as we speak and the WH is in chaos. This was a Bannon decision and it blew up in their faces. Now even more heads will roll but it won't stop the investigations, in fact only intensify them. Stupid, believe me.

So you believe that Bannon somehow wrote Rod Rosenstein's Memo about Comey? That he had other former Attorney Generals agree with?

Quote from the MEMO

My perspective on these issues is shared by former Attorneys General and Deputy Attorneys General from different eras and both political parties. Judge Laurence Silberman, who served as Deputy Attorneys General under President Ford, wrote that "it is not the bureau's responsibility to opine on whether a matter should be prosecuted." Silberman believes that the Director's "Performance was so inappropriate for an FBI director that [he] doubt[s] the bureau will ever completely recover." Jamie Gorelick, Deputy Attorney General under President George W. Bush, to opine that the Director had "chosen personally to restrike the balance between transparency and fairness, department from the department's traditions." They concluded that the Director violated his obligation to "preserve, protect and defend" the traditions of the Department and the FBI.

So Bannon convinced all those people?

Reality : a non-partisan Deputy AG, also appointed by Obama to a position during his administration no less, steps into the job two weeks ago and gets testimony from several ex AG's and people within the FBI that says Comey is unfit to lead. Trump takes this non-partisans advice and fires Comey.

Liberal propaganda: Russia

That's about the sum of it.

Everyone plays politics but the more they push these blatantly transparent lies the bigger they're gonna lose in 2018. Let them hang themselves.

Agreed - I don't think they yet realise that those salivating over the next set of lies they can push are only playing to extremists. Every word out of their mouths alienates another rational person.

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: olaru12


AND THIS..


The fact that Trump chose to do this when Comey was in LA..
Not in person, not even by phone...But bizarrely by a letter in a manila envelope hand delivered by Trump goons (security guards from campaign) to FBI HQ in DC..

Comey found out by seeing it on the news..

THAT afforded Trumps people 24 hours to rifle through Comey's office at HQ and figure out what he might have in the investigation...By the time Comey got back to DC Trumps folks had already been through his office, locked him out of his PC, pulled all his access etc.

It was done by design to give Comey no heads up and while he was out of town so they could swoop in without him securing anything about Trump from the Russia Investigation.

hahahaha!

Any evidence of "desk rifling" or are you just in a bit of a tizz because there is no evidence to support your wild conspiracy theories?

It is the only explanation on the bizzare way this unfolded...no heads up, no call, waiting until Comey was out of town and then sending Trump's personal goon, Schiller to deliver a letter to comeys office in DC..While Comey was in LA...Schiller is a former NYC Detective that Trump has had on the payroll for years..Comey heard he was fired by seeing it on CNN..

Meanwhile, back at FBI headquarters, news was quickly spreading that Comey was being ushered out. Instead of delivering Trump's letter to Comey in person, Schiller deposited the document at his office.
Comey, in fact, wasn't at his agency's headquarters at all when Schiller arrived with the missive from the President; he was addressing agents at the FBI's Los Angeles field office when news came down that Trump had demanded his resignation.

Schiller and team had 24 hours to pack up Comeys office for him before he got back to DC...

This does not end well for Trump and team..
www.cnn.com...

The only explanation? No, the only explanation that fits some nonsense story made up for political purposes. How about you provide some substance for your wild claims?

a reply to: Aazadan

Not true. FBI directors serve ten years thanks to Congress for the exact opposite of your reason.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: talisman

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: 4N0M4LY
Yeap. As I saw as a reaction. All the hard core liberals, celebrities and democrat senators are thinking Trump should be investigated and impeached.....


I mean if Trump was trying to hide something and turned out to be true. I will even be shocked by it. But these people that are calling the president a traitor and corrupt need to take a chill pill and let the government sort itself out.

If Trump gets forcibly removed without some sort of due process or trial. There will be outrage for sure. You think triggered liberals are bad? You haven't seen ugly yet. Several constitutional patriotic groups are itching to have a reason to go to war.

If Trump WAS trying to hide something the very last thing he would do is make an enemy of the FBI Director investigating the bogus Russian claims.

That's just it. The Russians claims aren't bogus and a special prosecuter is being appointed as we speak and the WH is in chaos. This was a Bannon decision and it blew up in their faces. Now even more heads will roll but it won't stop the investigations, in fact only intensify them. Stupid, believe me.

So you believe that Bannon somehow wrote Rod Rosenstein's Memo about Comey? That he had other former Attorney Generals agree with?

Quote from the MEMO

My perspective on these issues is shared by former Attorneys General and Deputy Attorneys General from different eras and both political parties. Judge Laurence Silberman, who served as Deputy Attorneys General under President Ford, wrote that "it is not the bureau's responsibility to opine on whether a matter should be prosecuted." Silberman believes that the Director's "Performance was so inappropriate for an FBI director that [he] doubt[s] the bureau will ever completely recover." Jamie Gorelick, Deputy Attorney General under President George W. Bush, to opine that the Director had "chosen personally to restrike the balance between transparency and fairness, department from the department's traditions." They concluded that the Director violated his obligation to "preserve, protect and defend" the traditions of the Department and the FBI.

So Bannon convinced all those people?

Reality : a non-partisan Deputy AG, also appointed by Obama to a position during his administration no less, steps into the job two weeks ago and gets testimony from several ex AG's and people within the FBI that says Comey is unfit to lead. Trump takes this non-partisans advice and fires Comey.

Liberal propaganda: Russia

That's about the sum of it.

Everyone plays politics but the more they push these blatantly transparent lies the bigger they're gonna lose in 2018. Let them hang themselves.

Agreed - I don't think they yet realise that those salivating over the next set of lies they can push are only playing to extremists. Every word out of their mouths alienates another rational person.

Stick with that...while you squeeze around the elephant in the room, try not to get to much elephant # on your shoe...

Trump and allies will count their blessings if they survive until 2018 without impeachment and criminal charges where appropriate.

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: talisman

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: 4N0M4LY
Yeap. As I saw as a reaction. All the hard core liberals, celebrities and democrat senators are thinking Trump should be investigated and impeached.....


I mean if Trump was trying to hide something and turned out to be true. I will even be shocked by it. But these people that are calling the president a traitor and corrupt need to take a chill pill and let the government sort itself out.

If Trump gets forcibly removed without some sort of due process or trial. There will be outrage for sure. You think triggered liberals are bad? You haven't seen ugly yet. Several constitutional patriotic groups are itching to have a reason to go to war.

If Trump WAS trying to hide something the very last thing he would do is make an enemy of the FBI Director investigating the bogus Russian claims.

That's just it. The Russians claims aren't bogus and a special prosecuter is being appointed as we speak and the WH is in chaos. This was a Bannon decision and it blew up in their faces. Now even more heads will roll but it won't stop the investigations, in fact only intensify them. Stupid, believe me.

So you believe that Bannon somehow wrote Rod Rosenstein's Memo about Comey? That he had other former Attorney Generals agree with?

Quote from the MEMO

My perspective on these issues is shared by former Attorneys General and Deputy Attorneys General from different eras and both political parties. Judge Laurence Silberman, who served as Deputy Attorneys General under President Ford, wrote that "it is not the bureau's responsibility to opine on whether a matter should be prosecuted." Silberman believes that the Director's "Performance was so inappropriate for an FBI director that [he] doubt[s] the bureau will ever completely recover." Jamie Gorelick, Deputy Attorney General under President George W. Bush, to opine that the Director had "chosen personally to restrike the balance between transparency and fairness, department from the department's traditions." They concluded that the Director violated his obligation to "preserve, protect and defend" the traditions of the Department and the FBI.

So Bannon convinced all those people?

Reality : a non-partisan Deputy AG, also appointed by Obama to a position during his administration no less, steps into the job two weeks ago and gets testimony from several ex AG's and people within the FBI that says Comey is unfit to lead. Trump takes this non-partisans advice and fires Comey.

Liberal propaganda: Russia

That's about the sum of it.

Everyone plays politics but the more they push these blatantly transparent lies the bigger they're gonna lose in 2018. Let them hang themselves.

Agreed - I don't think they yet realise that those salivating over the next set of lies they can push are only playing to extremists. Every word out of their mouths alienates another rational person.

Stick with that...while you squeeze around the elephant in the room, try not to get to much elephant # on your shoe...

Trump and allies will count their blessings if they survive until 2018 without impeachment and criminal charges where appropriate.

Lol. Would that be a white elephant by any chance

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: olaru12


AND THIS..


The fact that Trump chose to do this when Comey was in LA..
Not in person, not even by phone...But bizarrely by a letter in a manila envelope hand delivered by Trump goons (security guards from campaign) to FBI HQ in DC..

Comey found out by seeing it on the news..

THAT afforded Trumps people 24 hours to rifle through Comey's office at HQ and figure out what he might have in the investigation...By the time Comey got back to DC Trumps folks had already been through his office, locked him out of his PC, pulled all his access etc.

It was done by design to give Comey no heads up and while he was out of town so they could swoop in without him securing anything about Trump from the Russia Investigation.

hahahaha!

Any evidence of "desk rifling" or are you just in a bit of a tizz because there is no evidence to support your wild conspiracy theories?

It is the only explanation on the bizzare way this unfolded...no heads up, no call, waiting until Comey was out of town and then sending Trump's personal goon, Schiller to deliver a letter to comeys office in DC..While Comey was in LA...Schiller is a former NYC Detective that Trump has had on the payroll for years..Comey heard he was fired by seeing it on CNN..

Meanwhile, back at FBI headquarters, news was quickly spreading that Comey was being ushered out. Instead of delivering Trump's letter to Comey in person, Schiller deposited the document at his office.
Comey, in fact, wasn't at his agency's headquarters at all when Schiller arrived with the missive from the President; he was addressing agents at the FBI's Los Angeles field office when news came down that Trump had demanded his resignation.

Schiller and team had 24 hours to pack up Comeys office for him before he got back to DC...

This does not end well for Trump and team..
www.cnn.com...

How much can we trust when the reporter can't even get the basic facts right?

I read the part about Trump 'demanding his resignation'.
Trump's letter to Comey informed him that he was terminated effective immediately.
Basic stuff wrong, that reporter deserves a big raise, I guess?

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: burntheships

No, LE enforces the law. He declined to do that, using the weak excuse "no reasonable prosecutor" load of BS.

Of course you think that. You don't understand precedence and how those laws are enforced. He and others explained it quite well.

By the way, why hasn't anyone stepped-up to prosecute her? Hmmm...

When he did that, while calling her careless and negligent, He sealed his fate. She would have ruined him in an ugly way had she won. Anyone who denies this is just plain lying.

So you would admit that this was a political firing by Trump? Anyone who denies this is just plain lying.

It appears he did the same thing Clinton would have done..if she had won, of course.

Remind me again how long you worked for the Clinton campaign... I remember you talking about it sometime back.

I've never said I worked for the Clinton campaign.

Can you address what I said and refrain from making idiotic statements?

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: introvert
No I won't agree, read the letters from the AG's,
Comey did not follow protocol, while citing precedence.

He had this coming for a while.

Maybe now the FBI will give Weiner what he has coming too.
A jail cell for his peadophilia and sex crimes with a minor.

Comey was protecting him too,

Was he?

Can you provide evidence of him protecting anyone?

Trump is a lying fool and all his supporters are delusional and extremely biased. The alt-right has lost all credibility because they have lost all objectivity. This is as plain to see as day. Trump doesn't give two you know whats about Comey's handling of Clinton and any rational person knows this.

ATS has allowed itself to be devalued and marginalized by letting the alt-right run amok and it'll end up hurting the site in the long run. Lest this just becomes another Breitbart

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: olaru12


AND THIS..


The fact that Trump chose to do this when Comey was in LA..
Not in person, not even by phone...But bizarrely by a letter in a manila envelope hand delivered by Trump goons (security guards from campaign) to FBI HQ in DC..

Comey found out by seeing it on the news..

THAT afforded Trumps people 24 hours to rifle through Comey's office at HQ and figure out what he might have in the investigation...By the time Comey got back to DC Trumps folks had already been through his office, locked him out of his PC, pulled all his access etc.

It was done by design to give Comey no heads up and while he was out of town so they could swoop in without him securing anything about Trump from the Russia Investigation.

hahahaha!

Any evidence of "desk rifling" or are you just in a bit of a tizz because there is no evidence to support your wild conspiracy theories?

It is the only explanation on the bizzare way this unfolded...no heads up, no call, waiting until Comey was out of town and then sending Trump's personal goon, Schiller to deliver a letter to comeys office in DC..While Comey was in LA...Schiller is a former NYC Detective that Trump has had on the payroll for years..Comey heard he was fired by seeing it on CNN..

Meanwhile, back at FBI headquarters, news was quickly spreading that Comey was being ushered out. Instead of delivering Trump's letter to Comey in person, Schiller deposited the document at his office.
Comey, in fact, wasn't at his agency's headquarters at all when Schiller arrived with the missive from the President; he was addressing agents at the FBI's Los Angeles field office when news came down that Trump had demanded his resignation.

Schiller and team had 24 hours to pack up Comeys office for him before he got back to DC...

This does not end well for Trump and team..
www.cnn.com...

How much can we trust when the reporter can't even get the basic facts right?

I read the part about Trump 'demanding his resignation'.
Trump's letter to Comey informed him that he was terminated effective immediately.
Basic stuff wrong, that reporter deserves a big raise, I guess?

The funniest thing is that cnn think that a guy from Trump's office just turned up to deliver a letter at FBI HQ and was allowed to rifle through Comey's desks in his office, which apparently contained all the evidence he had! You can't make this nonsense up - well, normal people can't anyway.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: talisman

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: 4N0M4LY
Yeap. As I saw as a reaction. All the hard core liberals, celebrities and democrat senators are thinking Trump should be investigated and impeached.....


I mean if Trump was trying to hide something and turned out to be true. I will even be shocked by it. But these people that are calling the president a traitor and corrupt need to take a chill pill and let the government sort itself out.

If Trump gets forcibly removed without some sort of due process or trial. There will be outrage for sure. You think triggered liberals are bad? You haven't seen ugly yet. Several constitutional patriotic groups are itching to have a reason to go to war.

If Trump WAS trying to hide something the very last thing he would do is make an enemy of the FBI Director investigating the bogus Russian claims.

That's just it. The Russians claims aren't bogus and a special prosecuter is being appointed as we speak and the WH is in chaos. This was a Bannon decision and it blew up in their faces. Now even more heads will roll but it won't stop the investigations, in fact only intensify them. Stupid, believe me.

So you believe that Bannon somehow wrote Rod Rosenstein's Memo about Comey? That he had other former Attorney Generals agree with?

Quote from the MEMO

My perspective on these issues is shared by former Attorneys General and Deputy Attorneys General from different eras and both political parties. Judge Laurence Silberman, who served as Deputy Attorneys General under President Ford, wrote that "it is not the bureau's responsibility to opine on whether a matter should be prosecuted." Silberman believes that the Director's "Performance was so inappropriate for an FBI director that [he] doubt[s] the bureau will ever completely recover." Jamie Gorelick, Deputy Attorney General under President George W. Bush, to opine that the Director had "chosen personally to restrike the balance between transparency and fairness, department from the department's traditions." They concluded that the Director violated his obligation to "preserve, protect and defend" the traditions of the Department and the FBI.

So Bannon convinced all those people?

Reality : a non-partisan Deputy AG, also appointed by Obama to a position during his administration no less, steps into the job two weeks ago and gets testimony from several ex AG's and people within the FBI that says Comey is unfit to lead. Trump takes this non-partisans advice and fires Comey.

Liberal propaganda: Russia

That's about the sum of it.

Everyone plays politics but the more they push these blatantly transparent lies the bigger they're gonna lose in 2018. Let them hang themselves.

Agreed - I don't think they yet realise that those salivating over the next set of lies they can push are only playing to extremists. Every word out of their mouths alienates another rational person.

Stick with that...while you squeeze around the elephant in the room, try not to get to much elephant # on your shoe...

Trump and allies will count their blessings if they survive until 2018 without impeachment and criminal charges where appropriate.

Lol. Would that be a white elephant by any chance

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: talisman

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: 4N0M4LY
Yeap. As I saw as a reaction. All the hard core liberals, celebrities and democrat senators are thinking Trump should be investigated and impeached.....


I mean if Trump was trying to hide something and turned out to be true. I will even be shocked by it. But these people that are calling the president a traitor and corrupt need to take a chill pill and let the government sort itself out.

If Trump gets forcibly removed without some sort of due process or trial. There will be outrage for sure. You think triggered liberals are bad? You haven't seen ugly yet. Several constitutional patriotic groups are itching to have a reason to go to war.

If Trump WAS trying to hide something the very last thing he would do is make an enemy of the FBI Director investigating the bogus Russian claims.

That's just it. The Russians claims aren't bogus and a special prosecuter is being appointed as we speak and the WH is in chaos. This was a Bannon decision and it blew up in their faces. Now even more heads will roll but it won't stop the investigations, in fact only intensify them. Stupid, believe me.

So you believe that Bannon somehow wrote Rod Rosenstein's Memo about Comey? That he had other former Attorney Generals agree with?

Quote from the MEMO

My perspective on these issues is shared by former Attorneys General and Deputy Attorneys General from different eras and both political parties. Judge Laurence Silberman, who served as Deputy Attorneys General under President Ford, wrote that "it is not the bureau's responsibility to opine on whether a matter should be prosecuted." Silberman believes that the Director's "Performance was so inappropriate for an FBI director that [he] doubt[s] the bureau will ever completely recover." Jamie Gorelick, Deputy Attorney General under President George W. Bush, to opine that the Director had "chosen personally to restrike the balance between transparency and fairness, department from the department's traditions." They concluded that the Director violated his obligation to "preserve, protect and defend" the traditions of the Department and the FBI.

So Bannon convinced all those people?

Reality : a non-partisan Deputy AG, also appointed by Obama to a position during his administration no less, steps into the job two weeks ago and gets testimony from several ex AG's and people within the FBI that says Comey is unfit to lead. Trump takes this non-partisans advice and fires Comey.

Liberal propaganda: Russia

That's about the sum of it.

Everyone plays politics but the more they push these blatantly transparent lies the bigger they're gonna lose in 2018. Let them hang themselves.

Agreed - I don't think they yet realise that those salivating over the next set of lies they can push are only playing to extremists. Every word out of their mouths alienates another rational person.

Stick with that...while you squeeze around the elephant in the room, try not to get to much elephant # on your shoe...

Trump and allies will count their blessings if they survive until 2018 without impeachment and criminal charges where appropriate.

Lol. Would that be a white elephant by any chance

Lol. I will await some evidence. Nearly a year in and.. NADA. You'll be getting quite frsutrated and a little embarrased right now I'd imagine.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: burntheships

No, LE enforces the law. He declined to do that, using the weak excuse "no reasonable prosecutor" load of BS.

Of course you think that. You don't understand precedence and how those laws are enforced. He and others explained it quite well.

By the way, why hasn't anyone stepped-up to prosecute her? Hmmm...

When he did that, while calling her careless and negligent, He sealed his fate. She would have ruined him in an ugly way had she won. Anyone who denies this is just plain lying.

So you would admit that this was a political firing by Trump? Anyone who denies this is just plain lying.

It appears he did the same thing Clinton would have done..if she had won, of course.

Remind me again how long you worked for the Clinton campaign... I remember you talking about it sometime back.

I've never said I worked for the Clinton campaign.

Can you address what I said and refrain from making idiotic statements?

I remember you saying that as well...you post so much it would take hours to find it,,,but never understimate ATS members.

This is why leftists cannot be taken seriously:

They cheered when Comey's firing was announced on Late Show, have to be prompted that Comey's firing is bad.

Jeff Sessions is now interviewing for an interim fbi director. I expect McCabe will be fired as well in the next couple days. He should have been fired before Comey. All kinds of conflicts of interest with his he and his wife.

apnews.com...

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: talisman

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: 4N0M4LY
Yeap. As I saw as a reaction. All the hard core liberals, celebrities and democrat senators are thinking Trump should be investigated and impeached.....


I mean if Trump was trying to hide something and turned out to be true. I will even be shocked by it. But these people that are calling the president a traitor and corrupt need to take a chill pill and let the government sort itself out.

If Trump gets forcibly removed without some sort of due process or trial. There will be outrage for sure. You think triggered liberals are bad? You haven't seen ugly yet. Several constitutional patriotic groups are itching to have a reason to go to war.

If Trump WAS trying to hide something the very last thing he would do is make an enemy of the FBI Director investigating the bogus Russian claims.

That's just it. The Russians claims aren't bogus and a special prosecuter is being appointed as we speak and the WH is in chaos. This was a Bannon decision and it blew up in their faces. Now even more heads will roll but it won't stop the investigations, in fact only intensify them. Stupid, believe me.

So you believe that Bannon somehow wrote Rod Rosenstein's Memo about Comey? That he had other former Attorney Generals agree with?

Quote from the MEMO

My perspective on these issues is shared by former Attorneys General and Deputy Attorneys General from different eras and both political parties. Judge Laurence Silberman, who served as Deputy Attorneys General under President Ford, wrote that "it is not the bureau's responsibility to opine on whether a matter should be prosecuted." Silberman believes that the Director's "Performance was so inappropriate for an FBI director that [he] doubt[s] the bureau will ever completely recover." Jamie Gorelick, Deputy Attorney General under President George W. Bush, to opine that the Director had "chosen personally to restrike the balance between transparency and fairness, department from the department's traditions." They concluded that the Director violated his obligation to "preserve, protect and defend" the traditions of the Department and the FBI.

So Bannon convinced all those people?

Reality : a non-partisan Deputy AG, also appointed by Obama to a position during his administration no less, steps into the job two weeks ago and gets testimony from several ex AG's and people within the FBI that says Comey is unfit to lead. Trump takes this non-partisans advice and fires Comey.

Liberal propaganda: Russia

That's about the sum of it.

Everyone plays politics but the more they push these blatantly transparent lies the bigger they're gonna lose in 2018. Let them hang themselves.

Agreed - I don't think they yet realise that those salivating over the next set of lies they can push are only playing to extremists. Every word out of their mouths alienates another rational person.

Stick with that...while you squeeze around the elephant in the room, try not to get to much elephant # on your shoe...

Trump and allies will count their blessings if they survive until 2018 without impeachment and criminal charges where appropriate.

Lol. Would that be a white elephant by any chance

Lol. I will await some evidence. Nearly a year in and.. NADA. You'll be getting quite frsutrated and a little embarrased right now I'd imagine.

Liberals are taking one out of the conservative playbook.

"Repeat something often enough and it becomes true."

I've been awaiting evidence that Obama is secretly a Kenyan/Hawaiian (he was born in both places at the same time, anti-Christ) secret Muslim spy that's actually Osama Bin Laden in disguise who forges birth certificates who is also married to a gorilla-ape man who is a shapeshifting gorilla.

Nearly ten years and still no evidence.

originally posted by: RomeByFire

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: talisman

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: 4N0M4LY
Yeap. As I saw as a reaction. All the hard core liberals, celebrities and democrat senators are thinking Trump should be investigated and impeached.....


I mean if Trump was trying to hide something and turned out to be true. I will even be shocked by it. But these people that are calling the president a traitor and corrupt need to take a chill pill and let the government sort itself out.

If Trump gets forcibly removed without some sort of due process or trial. There will be outrage for sure. You think triggered liberals are bad? You haven't seen ugly yet. Several constitutional patriotic groups are itching to have a reason to go to war.

If Trump WAS trying to hide something the very last thing he would do is make an enemy of the FBI Director investigating the bogus Russian claims.

That's just it. The Russians claims aren't bogus and a special prosecuter is being appointed as we speak and the WH is in chaos. This was a Bannon decision and it blew up in their faces. Now even more heads will roll but it won't stop the investigations, in fact only intensify them. Stupid, believe me.

So you believe that Bannon somehow wrote Rod Rosenstein's Memo about Comey? That he had other former Attorney Generals agree with?

Quote from the MEMO

My perspective on these issues is shared by former Attorneys General and Deputy Attorneys General from different eras and both political parties. Judge Laurence Silberman, who served as Deputy Attorneys General under President Ford, wrote that "it is not the bureau's responsibility to opine on whether a matter should be prosecuted." Silberman believes that the Director's "Performance was so inappropriate for an FBI director that [he] doubt[s] the bureau will ever completely recover." Jamie Gorelick, Deputy Attorney General under President George W. Bush, to opine that the Director had "chosen personally to restrike the balance between transparency and fairness, department from the department's traditions." They concluded that the Director violated his obligation to "preserve, protect and defend" the traditions of the Department and the FBI.

So Bannon convinced all those people?

Reality : a non-partisan Deputy AG, also appointed by Obama to a position during his administration no less, steps into the job two weeks ago and gets testimony from several ex AG's and people within the FBI that says Comey is unfit to lead. Trump takes this non-partisans advice and fires Comey.

Liberal propaganda: Russia

That's about the sum of it.

Everyone plays politics but the more they push these blatantly transparent lies the bigger they're gonna lose in 2018. Let them hang themselves.

Agreed - I don't think they yet realise that those salivating over the next set of lies they can push are only playing to extremists. Every word out of their mouths alienates another rational person.

Stick with that...while you squeeze around the elephant in the room, try not to get to much elephant # on your shoe...

Trump and allies will count their blessings if they survive until 2018 without impeachment and criminal charges where appropriate.

Lol. Would that be a white elephant by any chance

Lol. I will await some evidence. Nearly a year in and.. NADA. You'll be getting quite frsutrated and a little embarrased right now I'd imagine.

Liberals are taking one out of the conservative playbook.

"Repeat something often enough and it becomes true."

I've been awaiting evidence that Obama is secretly a Kenyan/Hawaiian (he was born in both places at the same time, anti-Christ) secret Muslim spy that's actually Osama Bin Laden in disguise who forges birth certificates who is also married to a gorilla-ape man who is a shapeshifting gorilla.

Nearly ten years and still no evidence.

Glad you realise they're all the same - liars and propgandists.

originally posted by: EchoesInTime
Jeff Sessions is now interviewing for an interim fbi director. I expect McCabe will be fired as well in the next couple days. He should have been fired before Comey. All kinds of conflicts of interest with his he and his wife.

apnews.com...

Yeah. McCabe has to go. Corrupt to the core.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: burntheships

No, LE enforces the law. He declined to do that, using the weak excuse "no reasonable prosecutor" load of BS.

Of course you think that. You don't understand precedence and how those laws are enforced. He and others explained it quite well.

By the way, why hasn't anyone stepped-up to prosecute her? Hmmm...

When he did that, while calling her careless and negligent, He sealed his fate. She would have ruined him in an ugly way had she won. Anyone who denies this is just plain lying.

So you would admit that this was a political firing by Trump? Anyone who denies this is just plain lying.

It appears he did the same thing Clinton would have done..if she had won, of course.

Remind me again how long you worked for the Clinton campaign... I remember you talking about it sometime back.

I've never said I worked for the Clinton campaign.

Can you address what I said and refrain from making idiotic statements?

Okay.
I will go to bat for you.

As I recall, you had posted that you had occasion to meet Hillary Clinton in person..... at a campaign event (Iowa, maybe?).
Others... me included, jumped to the conclusion that you worked for her campaign.

I believe that you cleared things up back then when you explained that you were involved with some phase of the set up for the event, but were not working directly for Hillary Clinton. Just like a contractor.

Is that close to being right?