It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Vasa Croe
You're saying that Trump is merely going to finish the work of the Secure Fence Act?
That's not what he says.
His "Great Wall" is entirely different because apparently, what we already have is ... non-existent, since his claim is that the US has done nothing to protect our borders, prior to his advent of course.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: Mordekaiser
You would PREFER the GOVERNMENT GETS TO CHOOSE how states handle contracts? Or that California should have the rights to make their own choices?
I think California should be open in their discrimination and to stop trying to bullsh#t people into thinking it's anything but.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
I think conservatives and Republicans should be open in their dishonesty and hypocrisy that desperately portrays States taking steps against a Federal political act by using a political act as discrimination.
Let's just tell the truth here, eh?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Vasa Croe
That's not at all what he says. He said (do you need the quote) that he would build a Great Wall along the whole southern border up to 55 ft high made of steel and concrete.
Are you saying that Mr. Trump doesn't understand his own proposal?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE
You have a problem with States Rights and local determination?
Hmmm.
State's rights are a great thing, but this is not an example of state's rights, this is an example of a state abusing its presumed power in order to promote a political agenda, and I would argue that it is an unconstitutional act that will never stand up to judicial scrutiny if passed.
The funny thing is, the construction industry employs a LOT of immigrant labor (both legal and illegal), so to bar construction companies future state contracts for work if they work on the wall is to deny many immigrants the work that they generally came here to find. Nice job painting yourselves into a corner, California legislators.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE
You have a problem with States Rights and local determination?
Hmmm.
Did you take that stance in regard to Arizona's moves to enforce the laws in their own state concerning illegal aliens?
I'm not a great advocate for States Rights or local determination when it contravenes our rights as Americans.
However, I'm not the OP here, who IS on the record as supporting such.
Swing and a miss, Butch.
originally posted by: Mordekaiser
a reply to: DBCowboy
You want to know the first thing that happens if Cali or Texas succeed? The other would succeed with it; and Nevada, Washington, AND Colorado. That's how much back they have when they say "we're out" so acting like EITHER of their opinions is pointless/worthless is WRONG. Texas would sooner TAKE California than deal with the Eastern Liberal.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Tardacus
Basically the state of California is saying, "If you support Trump's immigration policy, you will not be awarded any contract from the state".