FBI Publishes 9-11 Pentagon Attack Photos on 3-23-17... With Faces Blacked Out

a reply to: MotherMayEye

So? How do you hide flight 77 in a missile or cordite narrative.

Hide the planting of explosives? Or the launch and flight path of a missile?

So? I guess a large jet hitting the pentagon is the most likely scenario. To hide the whereabouts of flight 77, conspire to hide no jet wreckage, conspire to hide no remains, conspire to steel a missile, conspire to launch a missile in US air space, or conspire to sabotage the pentagon would take thousands across many organizations.

If you are not the one who mentioned American Airlines set up funeral planning through a specific person, than I was mistaken.

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: MotherMayEye

So? How do you hide flight 77 in a missile or cordite narrative.

Hide the planting of explosives? Or the launch and flight path of a missile?

So? I guess a large jet hitting the pentagon is the most likely scenario. To hide the whereabouts of flight 77, conspire to hide no jet wreckage, conspire to hide no remains, conspire to steel a missile, conspire to launch a missile in US air space, or conspire to sabotage the pentagon would take thousands across many organizations.

If you are not the one who mentioned American Airlines set up funeral planning through a specific person, than I was mistaken.

You are mistaken. I have not pleaded any case. I am in the "I do not know, but I have reasonable doubts about the OS" camp.

a reply to: facedye

Your point? I didn't know a 757 flew by direct mechanical connections to the air surfaces. Oh, it doesn't?

A 757 used hydraulics, electronics, dampers, and items that compensate for speed.

Is it wrong safety is built into the electronic controls?

craigmiddleton.co.uk...
The control commands from the rudder pedals and trim control are modified by a rudder ratio changer. As airspeed increases the ratio changer desensitizes these commands from the pilot to reduce the rudder deflection. Rudder response varies from approximately 30° up to 127 knots CAS to 3.5° at 410 knots CAS for full pedal travel.

We will call your attempt a fail.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

Then I apologize.

Airplanes are made with titanium so I'm pretty sure that's just garbage thrown on the ground because there would be way more debris since titanium has a high melting temp.

a reply to: jkm1864

Titanium is only used in select areas where high strength and light weight are required

Aluminum alloys (2024, 7076T ) are the main components of commercial aircraft...

originally posted by: facedye
a reply to: D8Tee

are you claiming that all of the security cameras lining the roof of the pentagon were only capable of recording video at 1 frame per second? all of them?

bulls&!t.

please provide a source for that.

Chances are good thats the case.

Read this and tell me what you think.

11-settembre.blogspot.ca...

Let's start by looking at what the fixed analog interlaced TV camera would acquire.
Based on the currently available information, the Pentagon surveillance cameras that took the well-known videos of the impact were NTSC interlaced analog color cameras with an automatic iris and a shutter speed of 1/60th of a second.

You have to click the link and read the rest ok?

a reply to: facedye

Cite were I called you a name. I do admit I will call a person out for being ridiculous. Or will call out a person when they are not intellectually honest.

a reply to: D8Tee

the only source you managed to find is a BLOG???? about the SAME security footage video everyone has seen from the booth????

LOLOL

hoooooly lord. wow. thanks for that, that was a good laugh. pathetic.

this is what 1/60 shutter speed looks like:



....1 frame per second? did you think that 1/60 shutter speed meant 1 frame per second? please say it ain't so lmao, my sides won't be able to take it.

wow. forgive me if i don't ever take you seriously on this matter in the future. this was very telling.

Chances are good thats the case.

this means you can't prove it. you just hope that that's the case.

a reply to: facedye

i also encourage everybody here who sees these pictures to save them for later use, when he ultimately resorts to name calling, labeling and personal attacks.

What pictures?

a reply to: Wolfenz

In regards to Pentagon military personnel. At least one of the bodies has a lapel rank pin visible. Either a star or oak leaf.

a reply to: facedye

Couldn't take the time out of your day to click the link could you....

The shutter speed could be 1/10,000th, it doesn't matter, thats the camera, not the recording system right?

....1 frame per second? did you think that 1/60 shutter speed meant 1 frame per second? please say it ain't so lmao, my sides won't be able to take it.

You have proven your ignorance on many occasions so this one will be nothing new to you. Get it straight, I've explained to you before shutter speed and image recording are not directly linked, you just look more and more silly.

originally posted by: facedye
a reply to: neutronflux

my point is that you have no idea what in the world you're talking about but think you're the gatekeeper for what did and didn't happen on 9/11.

newsflash: you're not much more than an epic troll in these forums.

"we" all know that.

EDIT: that's just the tip of the iceberg too. i have so many hilarious examples just like that one that showcase your horrible lack of understanding of simple physics.

seriously, keep going. this is getting good.

i also encourage everybody here who sees these pictures to save them for later use, when he ultimately resorts to name calling, labeling and personal attacks.

This is your reply to my response on how a Boeing 757 adds safety and stability through hydraulics, dampers, and electronics to flight controls.

I have came to terms with not having the best grammar and spelling.

I do honestly try to "attack" the conveyed idea. Not the person.

But if you are not intellectually honest, rant, or only have innuendo, I am going to call you out.

I still stand by my premise the truth movement is filled with con artists.

I think it's sad people try to say it's a con a jet hit the pentagon when there are people using the truth movement for self notoriety and promotion.

originally posted by: facedye
a reply to: D8Tee

you know what's funny? i read the entire link. LOLOLOLOL

quit while you're ahead buddy. it's not lookin' good for you.

let me reassert this so that at least you can get an outside perspective: you can't prove your own assertions. you can't even support them with supplemental information. therefore, i no longer take anything you have to say about 9/11 seriously.

No you didn't read the link or you would not have said what you did.

As mentioned, the recording system records the pictures that arrive from the video camera.
However, in order to record for suitably long periods, the system does not record all the 29.97 NTSC frames per second (each composed of two fields): it records a single frame per second.
This is known as time-lapse recording.
But which single frame does it record, among the 30 acquired by the camera every second? That depends on how the system is set up, but undoubtedly whenever the second ends, the corresponding frame is recorded.
Knowing how the recorder is set up is important anyway, because those 29.97 frames per second differ greatly from each other in terms of image content.
What is the likelihood of recording that exact frame in which the aircraft is present in full, if such a frame exists and with all the doubts raised above?
The selection caused by time-lapse recording is such that the aircraft, despite being acquired by the TV camera, might not have been recorded, since it belongs to the frames that would not have been considered by the recorder.
Another aspect that should be ascertained before making any conjecture is whether there was or not a device for deinterlating the input signal ahead of recording and any other circuitry which might have altered the structure of the recorded fields with respect to the ones acquired by the TV camera.

a reply to: facedye

Is this just another question you are going ignore?

Is it wrong safety is built into the electronic controls?

You would rather rant, put people down on a personal levels (Vs attacking ideas) than engage in intellectual debate.

Maybe you get the same respect you show others?

a reply to: neutronflux

I understand your reasoning behind the post about the flight controls perfectly.

Maybe he Facedyne took a screen shot of my camera shutter speed post lol.

a reply to: D8Tee

a reply to: D8Tee

Hang in there! You are honest, factual, and to the point. And you don't get dragged gown.