FBI Publishes 9-11 Pentagon Attack Photos on 3-23-17... With Faces Blacked Out

a reply to: facedye

Sorry, the mere presence of a camera does not mean a videotape exists....

Kinda like RB-211 parts being found at the Pentagon does not mean they came from a 757. For all we know, conspiracy theorists mounted fake cameras when no one was paying attention.



Its fun to act like a conspiracy theorist.......

a reply to: facedye
web.archive.org... /www.flight77.info... You will have to cut and paste it... It is the catalog of the videos that the FBI gathered that day.

The summary:

" She determined that the FBI had 85 videotaptes that might be relevant. Of those, 56 "of these videotapes did not show either the Pentagon building, the Pentagon crash site, or the impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon on September 11."
Of the 29 remaining videotapes, 16 "did not show the Pentagon crash site and did not show the impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon."
Of the 13 remaining tapes which showed the Pentagon crash site, 12 "only showed after the impact of Flight 77."
The videotape taken from the Citgo gas station did not show the impact.
No videotapes were located from the Sheraton Hotel, though she located a videotape from the Doubletree Hotel."


13 videos were obtained by the Defense Protective Services (DPS) - Pentagon Police - on 9/25/2001 from individual filming Pentagon site from Boundary Channel Drive. These included footage from the WTC site in the days after the attcks.

One (1) Beta video tape - interviews in NYC
One (1) DVCAM tape labeled "Twin Towers, World Trade Center" - NYC/WTC
One (1) DVCAM tape - suburban setting, unknown individuals, dated 9/12-13
One (1) DVCAM tape - NYC/WTC, 9/21-22
One (1) DVCAM tape - NYC/WTC, 9/22-23
One (1) DVCAM tape - NYC 9/23
One (1) DVCAM tape - interviews in NYC; 10 seconds of Pentagon footage, but not crash site
One (1) DVCAM tape - no recorded video or audio information
One (1) DVCAM tape - no recorded video or audio information
One (1) DVCAM tape - no recorded video or audio information
One (1) DVCAM tape - no recorded video or audio information
One (1) DVCAM tape - no recorded video or audio information
One (1) DVCAM tape - no recorded video or audio information

8 videos were received on 10/11/2001 at Quantico. These videos were collected during consent search of residence in Avanel, New Jersey. Pending case on subject.

One (1) damaged Sony MP-120 8mm video tape
One (1) Sony MP-120 8mm video tape
One (1) Sony MP-120 8mm video tape
One (1) Sony MP-120 8mm video tape
One (1) Sony MP-120 8mm video tape
One (1) Sony MP-120 8mm video tape
One (1) Sony MP-120 8mm video tape
One (1) Sony MP-120 8mm video tape

Videos received on 10/15/2001 at Quantico. These videos were collected from surveillance cameras at multiple Kinko's in South Florida.

One (1) TDK 1-160 VHS video tape
One (1) VHS video tape
One (1) SONY T-160 VHS video tape
One (1) SONY T-160 VHS video tape
One (1) SONY T-160 VHS video tape
One (1) SONY T-160 VHS video tape
One (1) SONY T-160 VHS video tape
One (1) SONY T-160 VHS video tape

Video received on 10/22/2001 at Quantico. This video was recovered from garbage at residenced in Neenah, Wisconsin by the Neenah Police Department. Investigation on suspect has been closed.

One (1) damaged VHS video tape and housing

Received at Washington Field Office Command Post

These two video tapes included footage of post-crash Pentagon crime scene taken by DOD media pool photographers, and were obtained from Navy Rear Admiral Craig Quigley.

One (1) Betacam BCT-30G video cassette, labeled "1 of 2" & "early 6pm 9/11/01"
One (1) Betacam BCT-30G video cassette, labeled "2 of 2" & "early pm 9/11/01"

Also received at the Washington Field Office Command Post:

One (1) VHS video cassette - witness interviews near Pentagon after the attack
One (1) VHS video cassette, labeled "9/11/2001" - footage of post Pentagon crime scene, obtained from Chief Mastin, Prince William County
One (1) TDK Hi8 MP 120 video casette, wrapped in Pentagon map and labeled on back "1/29/1952 Mohan Shresesa 8/2/2018 Todoroki Japan 9/17/01 3:00 hr Fern/So. Rotary" - Home video taken from car, dated 9/17/2001,showing post-crash Pentagon crime scene very briefly from road (~10 seconds)
One (1) FujiFilm DP121 video cassette, labeled "WJLA-TV" - miscellaneous footage from news reporter, dated 9/18/2001
One (1) Sony MP120 8mm video cassette - Home video, DC sightseeing
One (1) TDK HG Ultimate TC-30 video cassette - Home video, unknown date, showing brief footage of Pentagon (not crash site)
One (1) Maxell DVM60SE mini digital video cassette - Home video, dated 9/17/2001, showing brief footage of Pentagon (not crash site)
One (1) Sony Hi8 video cassette - Home video obtained by DPS on 9/11/2001 showing ~6 seconds of Pentagon footage (not crash site)
One (1) TDK Hi8 MP 120 video cassette - Home video obtained by DPS on 9/21/2001, showing post-crash Pentagon crime scene
One (1) JVC MP120 8mm video cassette - Home video obtained by DPS on 9/21/2001, showing brief footage of Pentagon (not crash site)

Videos filmed on 9/26/2001 by FBI Forensic Audio-Visual Analysis Unit (FAVIAU) of post-crash Pentagon crime scene.

One (1) original SONY 40 min. Digital Betacam video tape
One (1) original SONY 40 min. Digital Betacam video tape

Videos submitted to FBI Laboratory in Quantico, Virginia, under cover of communication dated 2/19/2002, all depicting WTC footage.

One (1) Betacam video tape
One (1) HDCAM video tape
One (1) Betacam SP video tape
One (1) Betacam SP video tape
One (1) Mini DV video tape maked in part Antonio M.
One (1) DVC PRO video tape
One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1056 COPY 5A of 5"
One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1056 COPY 5 of 5"
One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1471 COPY 5 of 5"
One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1788 COPY 5 of 5"
One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1729 COPY 5 of 5"
One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1808 COPY 5 of 5"
One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1813 COPY 5 of 5"
One VHS video tape marked in part "1B530 COPY 5 of 5"
One VHS video tape marked in part "1B729 COPY 5 of 5"
One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1563 COPY 5 of 5"
One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1051 COPY 5 of 5"
One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1787 COPY 5 of 5"
One VHS video tape marked in part "1B2406 COPY 5 of 5"
One VHS video tape marked in part "1B1276 COPY 5 of 5"
One VHS video tape marked in part "CNN RE: BURN VICTIM..."
One VHS video tape marked in part "NIGHTLINE 2/15/2002"

Videos submitted to FBI Laboratory, Quantico, under communication dated 5/13/2002.

One (1) Sony SDX1-25C video tape
One (1) Sony SDX1-25C video tape
One (1) TDK 8mm video tape

Video obtained by FBI on 9/28/2001 and submitted to FBI Laboratory, Quantico on 5/28/2002. Home video filmed on 9/11/2001 showing footage of WTC after attacks, obtained by Suffolk County, New York Police Department.

One Hi 8mm video cassette tape from Eileen McMahon

Video obtained by FBI on 9/13/2001 and submitted to FBI Laboratory, Quantico on 5/28/2002. Home video filmed on 9/11/2001 showing footage of second plane hitting WTC and aftermath.

One Mini DV 60 video cassette tape

Video submitted to FBI Laboratory, Quantico under cover of communication dated 9/22/2001. Obtained by FBI NK from Dime Savings Bank, Nutley, New Jersey

One TDK T-160 VHS video tape

Home video filmed on 9/11/2001 by NBC4 Washington reporter, with footage of post-crash Pentagon crime scene shortly after attack. Provided to FBI on 9/12/2001.

a reply to: verschickter

Every video that showed anything to do with the Pentagon were released long ago.

a reply to: facedye

I've spoken to the subject of the video cameras at the pentagons, shown the camera model in question, shown how it's recordings are 1 frame per second. You don't understand the technical aspects.

a reply to: Salander

Without the full context in which "we were set up to fail" was used, your post is meaningless.

a reply to: jkm1864

Less than 5% of the materials used on the airliners was titanium. Next?

a reply to: facedye

Cause the FBI was in on it too right? So the entire DoD was in on it, so was FDNY, PAPD,and NYPD. Do not forget all the fire departments that responded to the Pentagon as well.......so, you have a cast of thousands in your conspiracy.....

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: facedye

Cause the FBI was in on it too right? So the entire DoD was in on it, so was FDNY, PAPD,and NYPD. Do not forgetall the fire departments that responded to the Pentagon as well.......so, you have a cast of thousands in your conspiracy.....

"entire," "all," a "cast of thousands."

Straw man, again.

I've yet to hear any theory that opposes the OS which requires so many people to be 'in on it.'

a reply to: verschickter

What video?

www.911truth.org...

Pentagon Security Videos: Recent work on the video from two Pentagon security cameras shows that they captured images of the approaching, low-flying plane. In his paper “The 85 Pentagon Area Surveillance Cameras,” Ken Jenkins explains the images, how the date error came about, and the likely origins for the trailing white smoke. There is no evidence at this time that the government is withholding other images of the event captured by the surveillance cameras.

Ken Jenkins and David Chandler also recently took pairs of sequential images from the Pentagon surveillance video cameras, putting them together as you would see them in what is called a blink comparator. In this way, the image of the plane “pops out.” If you watch the image cycle a few times, the details of the plane are clearly visible. You can find the blink comparisons on David Chandler’s website, 911SpeakOut.org.

I am a fanatic? The above was written by:

www.911truth.org...
John D. Wyndham (PhD) studied under two Nobel Prize-winners in physics at the Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, U.K. and, in his early career, was a Research Fellow at the California Institute of Technology. He is currently Coordinator of Scientists for 9/11 Truth. His research papers on 9/11 can be found there and on the website Scientific Method 9/11 for which he acts as Moderator. You can contact him at [email protected]

Why Wyndham (PhD) write the article? Because fanaticism over the pentagon is killing the credibility of the truth movement?

a reply to: MotherMayEye

Only because critical thinking skills are never applied to the conspiracy theories to add up the number of people needed to make them happen.

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: facedye

Cause the FBI was in on it too right? So the entire DoD was in on it, so was FDNY, PAPD,and NYPD. Do not forgetall the fire departments that responded to the Pentagon as well.......so, you have a cast of thousands in your conspiracy.....

"entire," "all," a "cast of thousands."

Straw man, again.

I've yet to hear any theory that opposes the OS which requires so many people to be 'in on it.'

Didn't you claim the coroner, the FBI, Reporters, DNA lab, the persons working for American Airlines that coordinated the funeral arrangements, the releasing of remains, and funeral homes were somehow manipulated or controlled by the federal government?

What about the responding cops, firefighters, and EMTs that saw wreckage and/or dead bodies.

The recovery teams for human remains.

The hundreds of workers cleaning and rebuilding the pentagon.

All the pentagon workers that saw wreckage and remains.

For the false narrative of a missile, the missile launch team, the airport workers covering up flight 77, military personnel that would notice a missile in US air space?

a reply to: D8Tee

are you claiming that all of the security cameras lining the roof of the pentagon were only capable of recording video at 1 frame per second? all of them?

bulls&!t.

please provide a source for that.

a reply to: cardinalfan0596

try 4+ cameras lining the roof of the pentagon directly where the impact was.

you still haven't answered my question, and are now trying to slide out of it like a fish caught out of water.

show me anything that proves the cameras lining the roof of the pentagon were not able to capture the impact.

got a paypal account? i'll bet you $20 you can't do it.

EDIT: this is now the third time i'm asking you for a source and am DIRECTLY QUOTING you to make it very obvious, clear and simple. let's try this again:

As for the light poles, I am not sure which conspiracy site you are getting your info from, but the "official" trajectory does account for either taking out the light poles by contact or by wingtip vortice...that they were not mentioned in the "official" report, means squat.

And no, I did not sidestep anything. The nose of the aircraft, keel beam/what was left of the cockpit/what was left of the avionics bay and yes, the nose gear and its associated mounting, caused the punch out.

please provide a source for these above assertions as well. otherwise, stop talking nonsense.

originally posted by: facedye
a reply to: D8Tee

are you claiming that all of the security cameras lining the roof of the pentagon were only capable of recording video at 1 frame per second? all of them?

bulls&!t.

please provide a source for that.

The video cameras themselves don't record anything, remember?

You know little about cameras and their ability to capture moving images and record them, it's pointless debating anything with you.

You're positive that there is 1080p 60 fps video of a missile hitting the pentagon and they just won't show it to you, carry on.

a reply to: facedye

One, you need to think in terms of pre 9/11 2001 security technology built by the lowest bidder for a facility staffed with security 24/7. Not in terms of post 9/11 2017 technology.

Two, the false narrative the pentagon was hit to destroy records? Why would all the security footage survive?

Three, many references have been cited that there is no more footage to release. Some sources from the truth movement itself.

Four, cited source that shows through video enhancement a large jet on the available footage.

a reply to: D8Tee

LOL what the hell are you talking about?!

i ask you to provide me a source proving YOUR OWN assertions about the security cameras lining the roof not being able to capture the moment of impact, and all of a sudden, i know little about cameras and their ability to capture moving images? what???

for your information, i have first hand experience with digital video, as well as tape and film. yikes! how embarrassing for you.

provide a source or concede that you do not have one (it's becoming painfully clear that you do not have one and are making things up).

a reply to: neutronflux

reply to me one more time, and i promise you i will post pictures in this thread of your absolutely embarrassing and hilarious replies about the "security systems of flight 77 keeping the plane in the air while the terrorists wanted to crash it."

i promise you i'll do it. stop replying to me unless you want to look even sillier than you already do.

a reply to: facedye

Well it doesn't show.

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: facedye

Cause the FBI was in on it too right? So the entire DoD was in on it, so was FDNY, PAPD,and NYPD. Do not forgetall the fire departments that responded to the Pentagon as well.......so, you have a cast of thousands in your conspiracy.....

"entire," "all," a "cast of thousands."

Straw man, again.

I've yet to hear any theory that opposes the OS which requires so many people to be 'in on it.'

Didn't you claim the coroner, the FBI, Reporters, DNA lab, the persons working for American Airlines that coordinated the funeral arrangements, the releasing of remains, and funeral homes were somehow manipulated or controlled by the federal government?

What about the responding cops, firefighters, and EMTs that saw wreckage and/or dead bodies.

The recovery teams for human remains.

The hundreds of workers cleaning and rebuilding the pentagon.

All the pentagon workers that saw wreckage and remains.

For the false narrative of a missile, the missile launch team, the airport workers covering up flight 77, military personnel that would notice a missile in US air space?

No, I did not. That's just another baseless, worthless straw man argument you decided to invent to make a point about supporting the OS.

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: MotherMayEye

Only because critical thinking skills are never applied to the conspiracy theories to add up the number of people needed to make them happen.

The lack of critical thinking skills is entirely yours.