It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
a reply to: Area201
Another join and dump account. Join and dump crap.
From the source The Dodo
Our emotional approach to content engages and motivates people with the overarching goal of making caring about animals a mainstream, viral, social cause. We’re committed to looking at the world through animals’ eyes, and engaging our audience through a combination of fun, authentic, meaningful content that helps pave the way for progress.
Emotional approach really says it all. These are not scientists these are people looking to make people decide things based on emotion.
Personally I don't think we should be shooting toxic metals around wherever we like, but realistically this has an incredibly small impact. Lead levels in predatory animals are largely from bioaccumulation, not direct consumption of lead.
originally posted by: smurfy
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
a reply to: Area201
Another join and dump account. Join and dump crap.
From the source The Dodo
Our emotional approach to content engages and motivates people with the overarching goal of making caring about animals a mainstream, viral, social cause. We’re committed to looking at the world through animals’ eyes, and engaging our audience through a combination of fun, authentic, meaningful content that helps pave the way for progress.
Emotional approach really says it all. These are not scientists these are people looking to make people decide things based on emotion.
Personally I don't think we should be shooting toxic metals around wherever we like, but realistically this has an incredibly small impact. Lead levels in predatory animals are largely from bioaccumulation, not direct consumption of lead.
I don't wish to say a bad word, so I will say that that birdies are not so big animals, in any case toxicity is more preferable to 'tiny amounts' like dust and grit, as in unstable Asbestos, and Gypsum rather than big lumps of material, as is a lead pellet that will be ground up in a birds gizzard.
But to be sure you have empathy with animals, that is worthy.
originally posted by: Blaine91555
a reply to: Annee
It was wrongly used by activists in the past, due to it's symbolism. It's prior listing was a purely political move.
The Bald Eagle has never been truly at risk. When they were pushing the false numbers there were more in just a part of Idaho, where I lived at the time, than they admitted to in the entire lower 48 States. Here in Alaska they are incredibly common. I've seen more than fifty in one area on the same day while taking photo's.
On the topic -
I'd have no issue with a regulation about the use of lead, providing it only applied to that and nothing else and the language was clean and easy to understand. I suspect there is more to this story and more included in the involved former regulation as is usually the case. Using something logical to bury purely political crap in is common.
originally posted by: Area201
a reply to: TiredofControlFreaks
If the bird is too stupid to avoid the giant wind mills then that's natural selection. Eating food that's dead and poisoned with lead is some another level.
Welcome to the new POS administration, it's here now and looks bleak for the environment. These cockroaches can't see beyond their own back yard or 5 minutes ahead.
originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: Area201
If the bird is too stupid to avoid the giant wind mills then that's natural selection
Wow, please tell me you didn't learn this in school?
Do a bit of research on the amount of birds killed annually by these ugly wind farms.
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
originally posted by: smurfy
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
a reply to: Area201
Another join and dump account. Join and dump crap.
From the source The Dodo
Our emotional approach to content engages and motivates people with the overarching goal of making caring about animals a mainstream, viral, social cause. We’re committed to looking at the world through animals’ eyes, and engaging our audience through a combination of fun, authentic, meaningful content that helps pave the way for progress.
Emotional approach really says it all. These are not scientists these are people looking to make people decide things based on emotion.
Personally I don't think we should be shooting toxic metals around wherever we like, but realistically this has an incredibly small impact. Lead levels in predatory animals are largely from bioaccumulation, not direct consumption of lead.
I don't wish to say a bad word, so I will say that that birdies are not so big animals, in any case toxicity is more preferable to 'tiny amounts' like dust and grit, as in unstable Asbestos, and Gypsum rather than big lumps of material, as is a lead pellet that will be ground up in a birds gizzard.
But to be sure you have empathy with animals, that is worthy.
Nice ninja edit to add the part about gizzards in your original post but most predatory birds do not grind up their food that way. That is more what occurs in birds who eat grains. It was nice of you to try going back to beat me by preemption though. Better luck next time.
originally posted by: Blaine91555
a reply to: Annee
Hunting them is not legal and they are not a game animal. They are not in any danger though from other things.
originally posted by: Area201
What do you gun owners and hunters think?