It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Apparently you never heard of Ed Snowden, the whistleblower who said not only does the NSA siphon up all this data through Prism etc and put it into a vast database that is searched for patterns, but he also said that the "controls" on individuals accessing the data were a joke and he wasn't even an NSA employee (just a contractor) and he could look up just about anything he wanted anytime he wanted and nobody gave him any grief about it.
originally posted by: Kettu
You do realize that if anyone at the CIA or NSA were to do that, their activity would be logged and tracked, right?
originally posted by: Kettu
Wow, stuff like this just shows how narcissistic Americans have become.
Yes, we're all so terribly interesting that we're being watched and listened to.
You do realize that if anyone at the CIA or NSA were to do that, their activity would be logged and tracked, right?
Even people at the DMV can't just look anyone's info up. They can get fired for looking up themselves or their family and friends. Each time they login to their software database its logged. Every search is logged.
And you people are so paranoid to think that isn't the case with the NSA and CIA? You think that they really care about the insane deluge of information their systems scoop up?
You are like an insignificant grain of sand. In a desert. On Mars.
And does anyone for one second think that Russia and China don't have this capability as well? Do you honestly think they're not spying on people, including high-ranking US people of interest?
So while you and I might be made a bit uncomfortable by the insanely remote possibility such a thing exists, wouldn't it be better if our team had the tools it needs to fight on a level playing field with our rivals?
But no, of course not. We're supposed to revert to an 1800's agrarian style country with zero government. And somehow, the rest of the world will just totally ignore our little conservative anarchist-libertarian utopia.
originally posted by: norhoc
a reply to: dashen
I think the real question to you people that are paranoid about alexa is what in the world are you talking about in your home or asking alexa that you are afraid of exposing? If Cia, NSA or any other alphabet soup agencies are listening to mine they are really bored lol
originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: Kettu
...imagine the man hours and amount of people required to keep tabs on who is looking up what. Unless something happens to draw attention it would look just like all the other normal server traffic.
originally posted by: Tranceopticalinclined
Wow, that's amazing.
And yes, I was one of those duct tape camera cover uppers.
originally posted by: DerBeobachter
Which sane person would put such a spying device voluntarily into his home?
Ahh, those that have nothing to hide, i guess. The smartphoners, facebookers etc...
Orwell rolls in his grave!
The Amazon Echo can seem like your best friend—until it betrays you. That’s because this device is different from anything else in your house. Alexa, the voice assistant that powers Echo and more, is always listening, sending what you say after using a “wake” word to Amazon’s servers. Of course, Echo isn’t the only voice-assistant speaker on the market, but it sits in millions of homes, and Alexa is headed to devices from companies like Ford, Dish, Samsung, and Whirlpool.
Arkansas police recently demanded that Amazon turn over information collected from a murder suspect’s Echo. Amazon’s attorneys contend that the First Amendment’s free speech protection applies to information gathered and sent by the device; as a result, Amazon argues, the police should jump through several legal hoops before the company is required to release your data. If Amazon has its way, the police must prove the state has a compelling need for the information and that the material can’t be obtained elsewhere (such as from another source—a receipt in a person’s possession, for instance). The information sought must be specific and integral to the investigation. If the police meet this test, a judge will review the information in private and decide what information, if any, should be disclosed.
Amazon’s effort to protect the data your Echo collects by invoking the First Amendment is commendable, but the company has failed to address the real problem: Why is all that data just sitting in Amazon’s servers in the first place? The brief Amazon filed in the Arkansas court confirms that the company saves the recordings and transcripts of your dialogue with Alexa on servers where “all data is protected during transmission and securely stored.” So should we just trust that Amazon’s servers are impenetrable?