Ex-Secret Service agent: Media missing 1 huge wiretap point

The other posts as written on the wiretapping matter are excellent and I support all but this guy is a former Elite Secret Service Agent who was assigned to protect the President. He brings up an excellent points. Pile it on.

www.wnd.com...

www.wnd.com...

conservativetribune.com...

a reply to: SecondTierSuburbsGuy

If Obama is Guilty he needs to prosecuted to the full extent of the law. An example must be made.

If Trump lodged libelous accusations he needs to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. An example must be made.

complete agreement.

Now, you guys know this is just a bunch of hoopla.
Its nothing but general everyday run of the mill fake news.

www.dailymail.co.uk...



Buck

a reply to: SecondTierSuburbsGuy

It helps is people dont have to go external to catch the jist:

The former agent, noting Trump had Secret Service protection as a candidate, thinks it’s much more likely the Secret Service discovered something while performing one of their ECM sweeps of Trump Tower and later found out it was the DOJ that had ordered the surveillance.

“That makes total sense, but of course the media’s not really interested in the story, because they want to find fault with Trump. So their story’s gonna be, ‘Did Trump force the FBI to tell him he was being monitored in some kind of an investigation?'” Bongino said. (Story continues below)

Read more at www.wnd.com...

It is ALL fake news.
Everything.
Prove contrawise..

originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: SecondTierSuburbsGuy

If Obama is Guilty he needs to prosecuted to the full extent of the law. An example must be made.

If Trump lodged libelous accusations he needs to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. An example must be made.

I get the feeling all of this goes way deeper than Obama and Trump.

a reply to: ManFromEurope

Sadly , its all true and a lot more.
And there will be a lot more coming out in the days and weeks to come.
Welcome to the real world.

a reply to: flatbush71

You have prove for that?

originally posted by: ManFromEurope
a reply to: flatbush71

You have prove for that?

No one needs proof.
The MSM has been running with the 'Russian' stories since before the election right up till now.... with no proof.
Suddenly, for you, proof is important?

a reply to: Grimpachi

As should trump if he is.
I think I know how it's going to turn out.

a reply to: butcherguy

They have proof.
And Obama declassified a lot of it so it will certainly be presented during the hearings beginning in a few days.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: butcherguy

They have proof.
And Obama declassified a lot of it so it will certainly be presented during the hearings beginning in a few days.

I'll wait patiently.

a reply to: Sillyolme

And Obama declassified a lot of it

source please

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Total conjecture. Sure there are lots of scenarios we can speculate but these stories all start with a great big IF...

Don't give them more weight than they deserve.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Total conjecture. Sure there are lots of scenarios we can speculate but these stories all start with a great big IF...

Don't give them more weight than they deserve.

Kind of like the Russian story??

a reply to: butcherguy

Ill wait too because there's no other choice but not too patiently.
I'm already a news junkie. Ill have a screen in front of me 24/7 when the hearings begin.
They will be televised won't they?

a reply to: GuidedKill

Don't accept anything without evidence. Just don't discard evidence simply because it doesn't suit your desires. Weigh it carefully and don't close your eyes to any of it.
That's the way you arrive at the truth.

a reply to: Sillyolme

I certainly hope that they are televised. CSPAN will surely air them.

a reply to: Sillyolme