Dr. David Jacobs

I do enjoy his talks and re-search. I agree with him to 90% with regards to the Grays (the only ones he does his re-search about) but:

It upsets me sometimes when he keeps on saying that ALL et cases are the Grays, there are no other species out there, it is only the Grays pretending to be other ET races to the human mind. And that ET abductees can't be trusted if they have conscious memories of their abductions or encounters.

I feel... that's... it's just too personal for me, yes, I take it personal. Because it is personal.

He is almost like Dr. Greer but the opposite, lmao!
Dr. Greer says ALL et's are benevolent and Dr. Jacobs says ALL et's are malevolent.

I do BELIEVE Dr. Jacobs only work with those people he wants to work with, those who mostly if not only have abductions with the Grays.

a reply to: BigEyes
If i'm remembering correctly, this is the David Jacobs who was requesting used womens panties for "DNA analysis", the results of which he never released, correct?

a reply to: BigEyes

Be careful what the genre celebrities propose. Their celebrity is their main source of income, how impartial is that?

Edit: One way you can tell they are FOS , they prefix their name with Dr. ... doctor of what, again?

Ufology, hand me the probe nurse...

a reply to: Ridhya

No way, he did that?
I've never heard of that.

a reply to: intrptr

I take everything what anyone says with a grain of salt.
And yes, when someone only promote one outcome or that there is only one answer, I am extra careful.

I get that people need to earn money, but it's very interesting that almost everyone who research the subject ET's and abductions always write books, do seminares etc.

originally posted by: BigEyes
a reply to: Ridhya

No way, he did that?
I've never heard of that.

Of course you didn't. Disbelievers in aliens have to resort to mud slinging with made up stories. They have no credible way to refute Jacob's research.

originally posted by: BigEyes
a reply to: intrptr

I take everything what anyone says with a grain of salt.
And yes, when someone only promote one outcome or that there is only one answer, I am extra careful.

I get that people need to earn money, but it's very interesting that almost everyone who research the subject ET's and abductions always write books, do seminares etc.

And I suppose scientists like Dr Stephen Hawking NEVER write best-sellers or appear on TV?

What's really interesting is how desperate some people get to find reasons for distrusting researchers whose findings they cannot refute......

a reply to: BigEyes

Imo, except for rare occasions the BS remains at the forefront in the public eye.

Imo, The loudest voices are the biggest liars, hoaxers, gubment psyops, etc.

Granted they mix a little truth with it to keep everyone guessing, but they do that anyway across the main stream spectrum, politics, religion, world events, the "News", etc.

Ask any alphabet agency their position on UFO's... NASA, CIA, DOD...

whaddya get?


(This space left blank intentionally)

a reply to: BigEyes
See for yourself



a reply to: micpsi
He implanted post-hypnotic suggestions in her that she had MPD and should take medication for it!! He is not a psychologist!! It really sucks when the "mud slinging" is factual, doesn't it.

originally posted by: intrptr
Ask any alphabet agency their position on UFO's... NASA, CIA, DOD...

whaddya get?


(This space left blank intentionally)

Um. I don't think they have a position on UFOs that they have made public. So your blank space can only symbolise their blank response. But look at their declassified literature and you will find something entirely more substantial.

originally posted by: micpsi

originally posted by: intrptr
Ask any alphabet agency their position on UFO's... NASA, CIA, DOD...

whaddya get?


(This space left blank intentionally)

Um. I don't think they have a position on UFOs that they have made public. So your blank space can only symbolise their blank response. But look at their declassified literature and you will find something entirely more substantial.

Thats a "substantial" truck load of data, show me one admission on their part that really proves anything.

a reply to: micpsi

I never said I didn't believe him or take his work serious, and I also wrote I understand that everyone need to make money.
I just find it interesting how most people who research the subject always write books, do seminars etc.

I do agree with most of what he says about the Grays, but it annoys me when he says ALL et's are the Grays and there are only malevolent ET's. It's just like when Dr. Greer say - there's only benevolent ETs.

I respect and find Linda Moulton Howes research the most authentic and genuine, but also she write books etc. But she is more open minded and report what she get. Even if I do not like some of who she work together with or promote sometimes.

I go with what connects most with my own abductions, and Linda Moulton Howe is top 1 becuase she has confirmed a lot of ET's I have seen, things I've experienced with regards to Black-ops and so on. So my guess is some of her connections or informers must be genuine.

I have always been a skeptic to regressions, they work sure, but it's very easy to lead the person or add suggestions to the person.

a reply to: Ridhya

wouw, not cool of him!
Im looking through (reading) her website now.

originally posted by: BigEyes
I do enjoy his talks and re-search. I agree with him to 90% with regards to the Grays (the only ones he does his re-search about) but:

It upsets me sometimes when he keeps on saying that ALL et cases are the Grays, there are no other species out there, it is only the Grays pretending to be other ET races to the human mind. And that ET abductees can't be trusted if they have conscious memories of their abductions or encounters.

I feel... that's... it's just too personal for me, yes, I take it personal. Because it is personal.

He is almost like Dr. Greer but the opposite, lmao!
Dr. Greer says ALL et's are benevolent and Dr. Jacobs says ALL et's are malevolent.

I do BELIEVE Dr. Jacobs only work with those people he wants to work with, those who mostly if not only have abductions with the Grays.

Well, in his defense, it is proven now (if you accept the thousands of supporting testimony reports) that the Greys are not only capable of shapeshifting, or at least to OUR eyes, and that they often do this to hide their identity when abducting humans.

originally posted by: intrptr

originally posted by: micpsi

originally posted by: intrptr
Ask any alphabet agency their position on UFO's... NASA, CIA, DOD...

whaddya get?


(This space left blank intentionally)

Um. I don't think they have a position on UFOs that they have made public. So your blank space can only symbolise their blank response. But look at their declassified literature and you will find something entirely more substantial.

Thats a "substantial" truck load of data, show me one admission on their part that really proves anything.

Well, there are actually quite a few declassified documents , and documents found via FOIA that mention UFOs. Not to mention the project bluebook they opened (why open it if the phenom isn't real?)

They obviously are up against some heavy stuff, and I doubt they will ever have a press conference admitting everything they know.

a reply to: supermarket2012

As an abductee of the Grays, I know this already.
I am not saying he is wrong about the Grays, but the opposite.

Although, I question his intentions when he claims there are ONLY Grays.

I believe I remember reading, As it turned out, Project BlueBook's head (Hynek) later admitted he was helping deflect and cover up UFOs, for the gubment. Then came out saying certain cases were un resolved, (the real goods).

in answer to your question about why start an investigation if they don't want us knowing, they do that all the time because they don't want us knowing.

You have to connect those dots between the agencies and the gubment, which like I said will never want us to see what they really know.

a reply to: BigEyes


Jacobs reminds me of Icke, being a one-tracked mind about the ETIs. The greys seem to be the workers for the mundane task of abductions and also were the ones that collected plants in the early days of UFO landings. It stands to reason that they are biological robots that know their jobs, but probably have no more consciousness/soul than a computer. That is my estimate taken directly from case after case of abduction reports.

Jacobs is a century behind in his thinking and many published words in his belief that we are being enslaved by the ETIs. Yes, we abductees have been used, as per a common understanding of the time, even victimized if you want to go that far. But in a rational analysis, that work seems to have been undertaken to change the destiny of the human race which is underway at this moment.

That he says (so you say) that we abductees can't be trusted has to be the case for him as we do not see the ETIs are the bad guys as he does. Abductees all have their personal stories to tell, some widely varied, but the most solid aspect of most accounts is that we humans are the problem on earth and not the ETIs that are here to help us.

In a word, Jacobs is "old-school" in his thinking, only a step up from the old, blasting rays guns of space invaders. Jacobs has the same problem of many of humans with "advanced" training and schooling. That is the abhorrence that smarter, more advanced beings are interacting with us and may well know better of what we need than ourselves.

Everyone who is backing up Jacobs should really read and listen to all audios on her website - Emma Woods

Gosh, he is leading and inplanting so much in her mind! Who knows how his work has been to other of his subjects.

It's really sad!
All my respect for him vanished now.