Meet the terrorist behind the next women’s march

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

So, do you have anything that's not 40+ years old?

Do you have any references to any violence associated with the recent women's marches.

I have to admit, I'm not surprised.

Oh, and by the way (if you actually watched your video) you know that Ms. Davis said (paraphrasing)... "This is not about violence, this is about principles ... but considering the violence that is happening all around us, there is bound to be a reaction to that."

This, 40-50 years ago, is an example of what she was referring to, if you really want to compare apples to apples.

Here is more info on Rasmea Yousef Odeh.

As detailed below, the demonstrable facts show that:
1. Prior to her arrest in Israel, Rasmea was a military participant in and organizer for the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP).
2. Rasmea quickly confessed in a highly detailed account just one day after arrest, along with other co-conspirators, one of whom also directly implicated Rasmea as the mastermind in a 2004 documentary.
3. After arrest Rasmea was allowed to and did defend herself in the Israeli military court.
4. Rasmea was represented by counsel.
5. There was an observer from the International Red Cross present who stated that the trial was fair;
6. The evidence of Rasmea’s guilt in the bombing was and is overwhelming, completely independent of Rasmea’s confessions (however obtained).
7. Rasmea herself admitted her involvement in the attempted British Consulate bombing in an interview years later after release from Israeli prison, as did her main co-conspirator who implicated Rasmea in the supermarket bombing as well.
8. The evidence of Rasmea’s immigration fraud was based on the indisputable facts and her own false answers.
This actually is just a story of a terrorist bomber rightly convicted in Israel, who then lied on her visa and naturalization applications to the U.S. and was rightly convicted a second time in federal court in Detroit.
legalinsurrection.com...

Visit the link above for bucket loads of info and to see the innocent people she killed in her involvement of placing bombs.

This thing belongs to be sitting in a cell next to Hillary, is what these woman's protest signs should read.

a reply to: gps777

Are you suggesting that your source is not obviously biased politically?

Your source has citations for everything but this list that you've cross published... did you wonder why that is?

Also, the facts that are ignored here is that Odeh served 10 years in prison and was released by the Israelies as part of a political prisoner exchange.

a reply to: spiritualzombie

It seems to be people like yourself who are s#itting your pants that your calls for violence are being called for what they are. If anyone is to be blamed for the violence coming from several groups in the left is because of mindless zombies like yourself. You have no one else to blame.

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: spiritualzombie

It seems to be people like yourself who are s#itting your pants that your calls for violence are being called for what they are. If anyone is to be blamed for the violence coming from several groups in the left is because of mindless zombies like yourself. You have no one else to blame.

And yet, you still can't name even ONE violent event associated with the Women's March....

a reply to: Gryphon66

not gonna bother with your other tripe, not respond with your obvious attempt to twist meaning of my words and comments.
but i will respond to this.

Keep repeating "questionable past" as if that means something. Speaking of common sense, these women have been professors and community organizers for 40 plus years. It's blatant BS to speak as if they are criminal masterminds ...

there have been and are countless professors and community organizers that are involved and support terrorist organizations, and their views. some may have been the masterminds, some just followers. just because your a professors or community organizer doesn't mean your sh@@ don't stink or that your above violence, or that you have common sense.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

Are you suggesting that your sources is not obviously biased politically?

Also, the facts that are ignored here is that Odeh served 10 years in prison and was released by the Israelies as part of a political prisoner exchange.

Are you once again ignoring the fact that these women are still saying the same types of things they said in the 70s?... Are you once again ignoring that when people who were "socialist revolutionaries" and not only called for violence but participated on violence haven't changed their minds when once again they call for "a feminist militant group"?...

Could you remind us when EVER "militant left-wing groups" were ever "pacifists"?

Militant Marxist communist revolution has worked so well for all the other places its happened...The Soviet Union, China, North Korea, Viet Nam, Latin America, Cuba
I guess they just thought now is the time to strike America...after all they had Obama and Soros to knead the dough
Communism has failed everywhere and it will not prevail in America

a reply to: hounddoghowlie

You can't even keep a civil tongue in a polite conversation or focus on facts.

Again, you offer nothing but empty rhetoric.

Name the professors that you're talking about. Name the terrorist actions they were associated with. Then show how these are related to the Women's Marches that are under discussion here.

Name any violence that any of these women have been involved in the last 40 + years.

List any violence that has been associated with these Women's Marches.

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Where's the violence associated with the Women's Marches?

Where's the calls to violence?

Back up your claims with some facts, not more empty rhetoric ... because it's starting to seem more and more that's all you have.

Did the article in the Guardian use the words "feminist militant group"? No. Those are YOUR words.

You're dredging up stuff from 40 years ago, and comparing it to stuff that happened 100 years ago.

GIve us something real now that shows that these women are calling for violence or that the Women's Marches have been violent.

I say you can't because they aren't and there hasn't been.

a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

Hey, we do know that Gryphon66 is simply going to ignore facts. After all, he keeps on claiming this is fake news when we can see these women are using the same language they have used in the past. Davis also claimed in the 1970s that "socialist revolution" and being a "militant" didn't mean violence, even though she was part of a known violent group the Black Panthers, and was involved in terrorism. Gryphon is simply going to ignore everything that refutes his/her own left-wing ideas simply because he/she wants to claim so. There are no facts you can show these kind of people. Even if he/she sees these women actually resorting to violence Gryphon will simply claim "that's right-wing fake news, where is my safe space?"

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

Hey, we do know that Gryphon66 is simply going to ignore facts. After all, he keeps on claiming this is fake news when we can see these women are using the same language they have used in the past. Davis also claimed in the 1970s that "socialist revolution" and being a "militant" didn't mean violence, even though she was part of a known violent group the Black Panthers, and was involved in terrorism. Gryphon is simply going to ignore everything that refutes his/her own left-wing ideas simply because he/she wants to claim so. There are no facts you can show these kind of people. Even if he/she sees these women actually resorting to violence Gryphon will simply claim "that's right-wing fake news, where is my safe space?"

Now you're going to try to forum gang me?

Massive fail.

Talk about me all you want and derail your own thread ... but you can't point to ONE thing these women have called for violence for in the last 40+ years.

It's so obvious and it invalidates your entire argument here. But keep playing games.

Name the violence associated with these Women's Marches.

Name the violence being called for by the subjects of your thread.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
...
Did the article in the Guardian use the words "feminist militant group"? No. Those are YOUR words.
...

LOL... It was part of the first sentence in the socialist manifesto...

The massive women’s marches of 21 January may mark the beginning of a new wave of militant feminist struggle.
...

www.theguardian.com...

You didn't even read the first sentence, and then you want to claim this is fake news...

LOL ... you switched.

Good job. I underestimated you.

You're right. Militant feminist struggle.

You had said Militarized Feminist struggle earlier.

"Militant" is in there. Still means "confrontive" not violent.

Now, you've done so well there ...show us the acts of violence being called for.

Show us the violence in the marches.

a reply to: Gryphon66

i'll give you just one right quick of the top of my head.

William Charles "Bill" Ayers

originally posted by: Gryphon66
That line is in the POST'S article not the Guardian's article.

You don't even know what you're talking about.

You have no evidence, only rhetoric.

You just ignored i quoted directly from the Guardian's article...

But hey, it's "fake news"... Right Gryphon66?...

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

There are sadly many here who will ignore the facts. People in America are used to a certain lifestyle and they do not know what it would really be like under this type of violent revolution.

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse

originally posted by: Gryphon66
That line is in the POST'S article not the Guardian's article.

You don't even know what you're talking about.

You have no evidence, only rhetoric.

You just ignored i quoted directly from the Guardian's article...

But hey, it's "fake news"...

See above.

The New York Post is fake news ... it just happens to be fake news you like.

SO ... where's the violence associated with these Women's Marches now ... you've stalled long enough.

originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: Gryphon66

i'll give you just one right quick of the top of my head.

William Charles "Bill" Ayers

Bill Ayers is a terrorist? What has he done since 1972?

In 1973, new information came to light about FBI operations targeted against Weather Underground and the New Left, all part of a series of covert and often illegal FBI projects called COINTEL.[20] Due to the illegal tactics of FBI agents involved with the program, including conducting wiretaps and property searches without warrants, government attorneys requested all weapons-related and bomb-related charges be dropped against the Weather Underground, including charges against Ayers.[21][22]

Bill Ayers - Wiki Emphasis mine.

Your conspiracy cred just dropped considerably.

a reply to: Gryphon66

and this right above your little quote.
Emphasis mine.

After the Greenwich Village townhouse explosion in 1970, in which Weatherman member Ted Gold, Ayers's close friend Terry Robbins, and Ayers's girlfriend, Diana Oughton, were killed when a nail bomb being assembled in the house exploded, Ayers and several associates evaded pursuit by law enforcement officials. Kathy Boudin and Cathy Wilkerson survived the blast. Ayers was not facing criminal charges at the time, but the federal government later filed charges against him.[7] Ayers participated in the bombings of New York City Police Department headquarters in 1970, the United States Capitol building in 1971, and the Pentagon in 1972, as he noted in his 2001 book, Fugitive Days. Ayers writes: Although the bomb that rocked the Pentagon was itsy-bitsy—weighing close to two pounds—it caused 'tens of thousands of dollars' of damage. The operation cost under $500, and no one was killed or even hurt.[19]

so he is a admitted terrorist and got lucky because a over zealous FBI agent screwed the pouch.
your defense just died.