Meet the terrorist behind the next women’s march

a reply to: hounddoghowlie

Not at all. They put bombs in empty offices. They destroyed property. No one was hurt.

COINTELPRO was just one FBI guy "Screwing the pooch"? Wow. Okay.

Please Educate Yourself - Cointelpro- Wiki

COINTELPRO (a portmanteau derived from COunter INTELligence PROgram) was a series of covert, and often illegal,[1][2] projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting and disrupting American political organizations.[3]

My defense just died? I'm not defending anything; you are desperately trying to prove that professors are all terrorists.

Is Bill Ayers advocating for violence now? Has he done so in the last 40 years?

What's the answer there, Hounddog?

About the same as with Angela Davis wouldn't you say?

THEY HAVEN'T.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Did you not notice I quoted the Guardian?... Now you are backtracking once you realized you just ate your own shoe because you are not even reading ANY of the information or even the excerpts that have been provided... You just keep proving you are incapable of admitting to make mistakes... Not to mention that you are ignoring these women are calling for "militant revolution" once again. BTW, because they are in their 70s, they probably won't participate in violence, but they certainly incite it.

NO response from the OP to two basic questions that regard the integrity of this thread ...

1. What violence has been advocated for by any of the authors of the Guardian article calling for renewed civil rights actions?

2. What violence has been associated with the Women's Marches of 2017?

With no concrete answers to these basic questions ... the validity here is non-existent.

/thread

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: Gryphon66

Did you not notice I quoted the Guardian?... Now you are backtracking once you realized you just ate your own shoe because you are not even reading ANY of the information or even the excerpts that have been provided... You just keep proving you are incapable of admitting to make mistakes... Not to mention that you are ignoring these women are calling for "militant revolution" once again. BTW, because they are in their 70s, they probably won't participate in violence, but they certainly incite it.

You really want to deflect to me don't you? You're desperate to take attention from the fact that you have no evidence for your claims here. (And you're repeating dishonesty, I stated above that I had made a mistake about one word.)

What violence is called for by the authors of the Guardian article?

What violence has been associated with the Women's Marches in 2017?

a reply to: Gryphon66

ROFLMAO... Haven't you noticed that the new "cointelpro" is actually the CIA, and other three letter agencies trying to advance "left-wing revolutions"?... Are you ignoring that globalist progressive/liberals like Soros are the people funding these types of "left-wing violence"?... Oh and btw, just because in the past the FBI did infiltrate these groups to discredit them doesn't mean these groups were not, and are not violent... Heck, under what rock have you been living that you are ignoring the violence and murders being perpetrated by such groups in present time? I don't care if it is a black, or a white group, a Hispanic or Asian, or whatever group. You resort to inciting violence, and calling for "militant uprisings" you are all part of the same disease that is plaguing the world.

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: Gryphon66

ROFLMAO... Haven't you noticed that the new "cointelpro" is actually the CIA, and other three letter agencies trying to advance "left-wing revolutions"?... Are you ignoring that globalist progressive/liberals like Soros are the people funding these types of "left-wing violence"?... Oh and btw, just because in the past the FBI did infiltrate these groups to discredit them doesn't mean these groups were not, and are not violent... Heck, under what rock have you been living that you are ignoring the violence and murders being perpetrated by such groups in present time? I don't care if it is a black, or a white group, a Hispanic or Asian, or whatever group. You resort to inciting violence, and calling for "militant uprisings" you are all part of the same disease that is plaguing the world.

Another wild attempt at deflection.

You've got nothing to back up your claims.

G'nite.

a reply to: Gryphon66

You are the one deflecting Gryphon66. You yourself claimed that quote came from the NYP, even though several times I quoted directly from the Guardian... Then you asked "where in the guardian are they calling it "militant feminist struggle"?... I quoted it again, and now you are deflecting and getting your panties in a bunch for being called out for your hypocrisy.

BTW, you also did ignore what another of the co-authors has written, and keeps writing about in the International Socialist Review advocating in favor of Maoist terrorist groups and claiming because The U.S. Canada and the European Union is calling these Maoist groups as terrorists that "the Maoist are attacking the right kind of people."

Now go back to your safe space and keep telling yourself "it's only fake news, it's only fake news"...

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

What violence is called for by the authors of the Guardian article?

What violence has been associated with the Women's Marches in 2017?

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: spiritualzombie

It seems to be people like yourself who are s#itting your pants that your calls for violence are being called for what they are. If anyone is to be blamed for the violence coming from several groups in the left is because of mindless zombies like yourself. You have no one else to blame.

Lol... calls for violence?? You just pull this sh#t out of your ass?

a reply to: Gryphon66

He's just one of the uneducated members of hysteria. Someone says women's march and he dives behind the sofa. Lol

a reply to: Gryphon66

Keep yelling some more please. We can't hear you with all the flip-flop you keep making. And what's the point, even when Madonna herself did call for violence you among some others have tried to defend her calls for violence... and yes, saying "I have thought a whole lot about blowing up the white house" is a call to violence... And let's not forget her claims about "peace' and then saying "f*** Y**" several times, because you know telling people who disagree with you FU is so peaceful and it's about "love'... Calling for a new "feminist militant uprising" is also a call to violence.

Not every woman attending will resort to violence, but just as there have been some who have already resorted to violence, there will be others who will resort to violence, and you ignoring this won't make it go away, and it won't make the fact that violent socialists are once again using "social justice" and "social reforms" to introduce the most backward policies ever implemented under socialist doctrines.

a reply to: Gryphon66


You think you have credibility by defending convicted or known terrorists, also someone who was found guilty of immigration fraud?

Did you watch the video in the link I provided with the interview of one of Rasmea friends, decades later, is she lying and under duress?



But I suppose in your world we`re the fascists, not those creating/leading and organising march's and havoc because they are butt hurt someone with female parts didn`t get elected, no matter how corrupt or dirty handed she was.


This is the very reason heavy vetting is necessary for the security of America, that DT is doing, pity it wasn`t enforced earlier, but she won`t last much longer, but might go out with a BANG.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Not at all. They put bombs in empty offices. They destroyed property. No one was hurt.

it's still terrorism whether or not any one is killed or not,

ter·ror·ism [ˈterəˌrizəm] NOUN the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.

bombing empty buildings is a action used for a pursuit of political goals. or is bombing empty building not a form of violence.
plus the pentagon, and , the United States Capitol building are never empty. the New York Police Department was given 6 minutes warning i can't say much about all their other bombings. not only that they also killed and wounded people with their bombings in at least one.

COINTELPRO was just one FBI guy "Screwing the pooch"? Wow. Okay.

educate your self, in his book he said that he did, not that he was persuaded or coerced by illegal actions of a FBI agent. he actually bragged about it, and as recently as 2013 he was bragging again.

My defense just died? I'm not defending anything; you are desperately trying to prove that professors are all terrorists.

there you go twisting my words again, show me exactly where i said all professors are terrorists.
my words,

there have been and are countless professors and community organizers that are involved and support terrorist organizations, and their views.

i said there have been and are are countless professors, not all professors. you need to brush up on those comprehension skills.

Is Bill Ayers advocating for violence now? Has he done so in the last 40 years?

at least not in public, i can't say what he does in private, but he is sure trying/ tried profiting from it, which is kinda sorry in my opinion. like being a terrorist is something to be proud of.

here are two of his books about it.
Public Enemy. Confessions of an American Dissident, Bill Ayers, Beacon Press, 2013, ISBN 978-0-8070-3276-3
Fugitive Days: A Memoir, Bill Ayers, Beacon Press, 2001, ISBN 0-8070-7124-2 (Penguin, 2003, ISBN 978-0-14-200255-1)

a reply to: gps777

Ah, a referee of credibility ... I've always thought that was a feeble ploy when you have nothing in an argument.

I haven't defended anyone; I asked you a specific question that you have yet to answer.

Have any of these women who authored this article called for violence? Yes, or no?

Has there been any violence at the Women's marches?

I haven't called you a fascist; how absurd.

What havoc is associated with the Women's Marches?

You're already sputtering with silly insults.

Heavy vetting? LOL.

Yeah, talk about anything but the topic.

a reply to: hounddoghowlie

It was terrorism yes. In 1972. Said that an hour ago.

Your statement was that there are all these professors who are continuing to organize violence, and you haven't proven even one tiny smidgen of that claim.

There's no defense for violence; I've stated that dozens of times too.

You're doing the same thing others are doing in the thread, and I'm bored to tears:

What violence is called for by the authors of the Guardian article?

What violence has been associated with the Women's Marches in 2017?

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: Gryphon66

Keep yelling some more please. We can't hear you with all the flip-flop you keep making. And what's the point, even when Madonna herself did call for violence you among some others have tried to defend her calls for violence... and yes, saying "I have thought a whole lot about blowing up the white house" is a call to violence... And let's not forget her claims about "peace' and then saying "f*** Y**" several times, because you know telling people who disagree with you FU is so peaceful and it's about "love'... Calling for a new "feminist militant uprising" is also a call to violence.

Not every woman attending will resort to violence, but just as there have been some who have already resorted to violence, there will be others who will resort to violence, and you ignoring this won't make it go away, and it won't make the fact that violent socialists are once again using "social justice" and "social reforms" to introduce the most backward policies ever implemented under socialist doctrines.

I'm not yelling, EO. You keep ignoring the two basic questions that frame the claims of your thread, so I thought maybe you just couldn't see them.

If you're going to quote Madonna, give the full quote. If you don't your argument looks very weak:

"I've been thinking about blowing up the White House (said in front of 2 million or so people) but I choose love."

I'm done asking you questions because you have proven your mettle:

There's been zero violence at the Women's Marches in 2017.

There was no calls to violence in the article these women authored in the Guardian.

a reply to: Kali74

Rasmea Yousef Odeh was already found guilty of fraud which means her citizenship has been revoked. When you lie in your citizenship application that immediately revokes your citizenship, or green card status.

Niraj Warikoo , Detroit Free Press Published 8:52 a.m. ET March 12, 2015 | Updated 11:06 p.m. ET March 12, 2015

Palestinian activist Rasmieh Odeh, 67, was sentenced today in a Detroit courtroom to 18 months for immigration fraud tied to her alleged role in bombings in Israel in 1969 that killed two civilians. Her case has drawn national attention, becoming a flash point in the debate over Israel.

U.S. District Judge Gershwin Drain handed down the sentence in a packed courtroom, calling the former Jackson resident a liar and a terrorist. He said the sentence was right in the middle of the recommended 15 to 21 months for her crime of not disclosing on her immigration and citizenship forms if she had ever been arrested in or convicted of a crime.
...

www.freep.com...

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: Kali74

Rasmea Yousef Odeh was already found guilty of fraud which means her citizenship has been revoked. When you lie in your citizenship application that immediately revokes your citizenship, or green card status.

Palestinian activist Rasmieh Odeh, 67, was sentenced today in a Detroit courtroom to 18 months for immigration fraud tied to her alleged role in bombings in Israel in 1969 that killed two civilians. Her case has drawn national attention, becoming a flash point in the debate over Israel.

U.S. District Judge Gershwin Drain handed down the sentence in a packed courtroom, calling the former Jackson resident a liar and a terrorist. He said the sentence was right in the middle of the recommended 15 to 21 months for her crime of not disclosing on her immigration and citizenship forms if she had ever been arrested in or convicted of a crime.
...

www.freep.com...

Still no violence.

Still no violence advocated for.

a reply to: Gryphon66

It was terrorism yes. In 1972. Said that an hour ago.

really i just scrolled through the last few pages that go back about a hour and haven't found that. sorry if you did must have missed it, i just look at the replies to my post when i respond to something said to me, when i 've been away for a bit.


it appears that you are becoming triggered, that's three time now you have yelled at people. need to simmer down before you bust a blood vessel or have a aneurysm. but you know that's typical of the left, they start yelling when they can't prove a point.

i'm gonna bow out now i wouldn't want to be responsible for you popping one.

a reply to: Kali74

Oh and btw, even though she was convicted for the bombing which killed 2 African nationals, and injured 8 others, in 2015 and 2016 the students for Justice in Palestine have been campaigning for her, and raising a fundraiser not only to free her, but to allow her to stay in the U.S.