The Anomalous Moon

a reply to: humanoidlord

Do you understand concepts such as 3D, convex, concave and other geometrical features?

a reply to: noonebutme

How so may be 30 years ago and not now, explain.

originally posted by: humanoidlord
a reply to: Phage

f#ck nsa fbi and similars ATS SHOULD LAUNCH A CIVILIAN SPY SATTELITE

Elon Musk is offering holiday orbits to the moon, cant wait for the holiday snaps

Some advice for those checking images via their phones or led monitors etc.

When viewing images and zooming you get to the point where the images can start to pixlate badly and the pics start to break apart, a good way to negate this problem is to use a decent magnifier as it is better than zooming unless the image is very high res to start with then you can push the envelope quite a bit farther.

a reply to: lunarrover

obviously! im no ramdom mr nobody

a reply to: lunarrover

im saying that ats should launch one of those to earth,moon and mars nothing can hide from the eyes of the public

This thread is beginning to remind me of this thread:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: eriktheawful

Except my images arev1000% better.

a reply to: lunarrover

narcisism much????

a reply to: eriktheawful

that menber you are pointing out was actually a profilic menber of a certain mars anomalies forum
he would spam the forums with his suposed antartic anomalies as you have already said none never saw those "anomalies"

originally posted by: lunarrover
SELENE JAXA Evidence as posted earlier.

Explain. What evidence? There is nothing I can see but craters. Where is the building? The bases? Show me something that doesn't require me to squint or 'draw my own conclusions'.

JAXA are controlled by NASA.

Ah I didn't know that. Can you please link me to the documents that show JAXA is controlled by NASA? I'm sure Naoki Okumura would like to know his space agency is controlled by the Americans.

Oh wait. You can't. Why? Oh yes of course. It's all in your head. Like the rest of your 'evidence'.

a reply to: noonebutme

The mushroom cloud that vapourised their identity took care of that back in 1945 Japan have been reduced to nothing more than capitalist techno crap puppets churning out tv's and PS4's for their American overlords.

I have posted enough images to prove it is real. I will try to help you over time however I am accustomed to people being resistive and difficult because I can understand it as being part of the human condition. They've done such a job on us all it is so very difficult to accept and there is catagorically no way on gods good earth that we are not alone in the universe and never have been.

I personally love anomaly threads. hat's why I [prematurely it turned out] gave a S&F. Just because we need other things than US politics.
I love a well constructed mystery, even if in the end nothing comes of it, it's like reading a fiction book.
I also am a believer of [some] anomalies and can't get enough of [well presented] anomalies that make me think. One of my all time favourite image is of the 'Mars Worms'. It shows clearly an anomaly and it can be checked and the more you look, the weirder it gets even if it is 'just' a natural formation, it is a mightily weird formation.

Then I went into this thread, almost with a bowl of popcorn and a blanket...only to get more and more confused and disappointed.

I love looking at large, high res images and have spent hours on Mars and Moon pictures, looking for stuff and finding weird stuff. I am mentioning this in case I get insulted by OP for being blind or not wanting to see or other such condescending things.

Looking at OPs images, they are unusable for any decent research. They are low resolution, some contain photographic artefacts that distort normal things into squares [wooo buildings, spaceships...].

I also like to 'enhance' any images myself and wouldn't do it the way OP did as harsh contrast brings up more artefacts.

I looked at all the images and saw some stuff but could immediately explain what it is or what caused the apparent anomalies. I have seen 1000x better images with higher resolutions, that made me look twice and go 'whoa'. However none of OPs pictures fall into that category.

I also noted sadly that OP ignores constructive criticism [as to how we here at ATS expect threads to be] and throws insults at those that can't see anything. If people can't see it is because we don't know what to look at, and when an arrow finally appears, I can still explain it away.

This whole thread should be scrapped and started again. With an introduction, followed by a theory and then strategically chosen images that underline said theory. I want to see enlargements, data points, resolution, size and camera details. I want to know when and what mission took the photos. Then I want to hear OP explaining why what he sees cannot be an artefact or an optical illusion with examples from science.

As it stands, someone just took an image dump [diahorrea] and calls everyone names who doesn't see what they see in the resulting mess. Not impressed.

originally posted by: lunarrover
The mushroom cloud that vapourised their identity took care of that back in 1945 Japan have been reduced to nothing more than capitalist techno crap puppets churning out tv's and PS4's for their American overlords.

Wow. Do you actually read the financials or have you ever opened a textbook? That's a very poor view of Japan. No country is perfect, but they are far from a 'vapourised' identity-devoid people.

I have posted enough images to prove it is real.

No, you haven't. You've posted pixelated, low-resolution images that show nothing. You 'want' to see shapes and buildings, so you do. I want to see them as well, but I also have a brain and I went to school and received an education, so I'm less likely to jump to conclusions over what my eyes may misinform me about the world I see.

I will try to help you over time however I am accustomed to people being resistive and difficult because I can understand it as being part of the human condition.

Explain your definition of 'the human condition'. I don't think you're using that term correctly. Being skeptical about someone's assertion that presents poor to no evidence is not 'being part of the human condition'. It's the rational, logical, common sense approach.

They've done such a job on us all it is so very difficult to accept and there is catagorically no way on gods good earth that we are not alone in the universe and never have been.

I categorically believe we are not alone in the universe. I fully believe there are other sentient beings from advanced and even less-advanced civilisations out there. But my belief is not fact as I have no evidence and I won't assume to tell people what I believe is true without supporting proof.

originally posted by: Hecate666
I personally love anomaly threads. hat's why I [prematurely it turned out] gave a S&F. Just because we need other things than US politics.
I love a well constructed mystery, even if in the end nothing comes of it, it's like reading a fiction book.
I also am a believer of [some] anomalies and can't get enough of [well presented] anomalies that make me think. One of my all time favourite image is of the 'Mars Worms'. It shows clearly an anomaly and it can be checked and the more you look, the weirder it gets even if it is 'just' a natural formation, it is a mightily weird formation.

Then I went into this thread, almost with a bowl of popcorn and a blanket...only to get more and more confused and disappointed.

I love looking at large, high res images and have spent hours on Mars and Moon pictures, looking for stuff and finding weird stuff. I am mentioning this in case I get insulted by OP for being blind or not wanting to see or other such condescending things.

Looking at OPs images, they are unusable for any decent research. They are low resolution, some contain photographic artefacts that distort normal things into squares [wooo buildings, spaceships...].

I also like to 'enhance' any images myself and wouldn't do it the way OP did as harsh contrast brings up more artefacts.

I looked at all the images and saw some stuff but could immediately explain what it is or what caused the apparent anomalies. I have seen 1000x better images with higher resolutions, that made me look twice and go 'whoa'. However none of OPs pictures fall into that category.

I also noted sadly that OP ignores constructive criticism [as to how we here at ATS expect threads to be] and throws insults at those that can't see anything. If people can't see it is because we don't know what to look at, and when an arrow finally appears, I can still explain it away.

This whole thread should be scrapped and started again. With an introduction, followed by a theory and then strategically chosen images that underline said theory. I want to see enlargements, data points, resolution, size and camera details. I want to know when and what mission took the photos. Then I want to hear OP explaining why what he sees cannot be an artefact or an optical illusion with examples from science.

As it stands, someone just took an image dump [diahorrea] and calls everyone names who doesn't see what they see in the resulting mess. Not impressed.

You can have the images, call it a gift, with love from me to you xxx

Why have you never posted anything of any real signifigance?

a reply to: noonebutme

Awe! stop it. You're only saying that cos.....

Considering the incredible amount of witness testimonies and extraterrestrial related data generated in the last 50+ years its not so crazy to think the moon may be inhabited in some fashion in my opinion. Logically if your going to conduct observation on earth its the best choice. Earth has been habitable for millions of years right? That's a long time for something to stop by and look around.
There is a lot at stake concerning disclosure for a lot of very rich and powerful people, the truth is most likely crazier than any of us think. These pictures don't do much for me but I'm already of the mind that we weren't the first civilization to call earth home. I hope I'm alive for the day real solid irrefutable evidence is shown to the world, what a time to exist that would be.

originally posted by: lunarrover

Why have you never posted anything of any real signifigance?

Aw, come on. Resorting to such manners, again ? When this user took time to explain - as some others have done before - why your thread is wrong ? His single comment has more substance than the entirety of your ramblings.

If you want to attempt to try and discuss a scientific matter with the outside world, accept that you have to conform to certain standards - especially on ATS, especially in the Space Exploration forum (I'm only assuming we are still on Space Exploration as I am on mobile and have trouble checking), if you want to be taken seriously. You've only been dismissing questions and failed the basic requirements for a honest discussion.

My advice is, try again posting a clean thread, with a few representative images in your first post, each with references indicating which files you got them from, and arrows, big arrows, pointing at the alien bases, ufos, vampires, anything you think is in the pictures. And be ready to show more civility towards the people who come discuss with you, otherwise, you might as well just open the notepad and post whatever you want in it without fear of anyone disagreeing with you.



Edit : I just checked and it is in Skunk Works. Sorry, I should have checked earlier. Well, you can do as you wish in here, feel free to disregard my message, but in case your thread was first posted in Space Exploration, or in case you plan on posting there in the future, keep all that in mind.

anyone want to buy me a ticket to the moon ?

I've always been an avid fan of it and going back on some old threads on ATS that were largely based around our visits and more so ability to visit the moon are interesting reads.

I'd like to believe we've been there and I'm not scientifically knowledgeable enough to say if we could or not.

All I can say is a trip there would be amazing just for the sights!

a reply to: Jokatgulm

Thank you, you are too kind.