The Anomalous Moon

a reply to: Phage

there's this

www.syti.net...

and
www.gravitywarpdrive.com...


but I don't trust Astronauts anyway

a reply to: kibric

Apollo11: These "Babies" are huge, Sir! Enormous! OH MY GOD! You wouldn't believe it!

but I don't trust Astronauts anyway

What makes you think an astronaut said that?

Do you know who Otto Binder was?
comicsalliance.com...

and
www.gravitywarpdrive.com...

Which one says there is a Type II civ on the Moon?

a reply to: Phage

the links are testimonies from Astronauts if you read through them
I cant verify any of it
but its a conspiracy site so I'll at least entertain the idea

Do you know who Otto Binder was?

no I didn't
interesting link
thanks

Which one says there is a Type II civ on the Moon?

I don't think any of them
but I thought I'll contribute something
try to keep ATS conspiracy related and not politics

a reply to: Phage

Where?

a reply to: lunarrover

wms.lroc.asu.edu...

a reply to: kibric

the links are testimonies from Astronauts

Not the "These babies are huge" one.

a reply to: Phage

thanks for another good link

you are good at this aren't you

a reply to: Phage

I dont like lroc too high up but ok if you like grey dead dust and rock I suppose.

a reply to: Phage

no worries
I'll edit

there ya go

just thought some of the testimonies were interesting is all

I'l keep my mouth shut

a reply to: lunarrover

I dont like lroc too high up

How "high up" was the image you posted taken from?

ok if you like grey dead dust and rock

I prefer a nice beach. But the the Moon doesn't have any.
It's dust and rock.

a reply to: Phage

I have no idea.

LROC is too low res, the apollo landing site images are a joke in in the HD world we now live in infact they are rubbish.

a reply to: lunarrover

I have no idea.

I'm not surprised.

LROC is too low res

It gets to about 25cm. That's better than you (as a civilian) can get for anything on Earth from a satellite. www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: Phage

Just not a fan of LROC as the images dont give a good enough representation of what the moon is imo.

a reply to: Phage

I'm not surprised.

no need to be a D*ck

God Bless The NSA

a reply to: lunarrover

Yes. Data which conflicts with one's paradigm can be problematic.

Best disregard it.

a reply to: kibric

no need to be a D*ck

Don't you think that one should understand the "evidence" which one presents?

a reply to: Phage

yes I do

doesn't excuse snarky comments if someone is not up to speed
does it ?

a reply to: Phage

Show me the data and I will take a look at it but as of now LROC is not worth bothering with unless you can change my mind with good quality data the forget it.

I'm open to anything that is quality.

a reply to: kibric

I've gone the hand holding route. It's ineffective in this medium.

Some, however, can be induced to do some actual research through snark.

a reply to: Phage

so being a D*ck is more effective ?

your doing well

I'm convinced