It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Throes
I don't think anyone is saying abolish PP. Just stop the government funding and go back to it being funding by donations.
Not sure why, when other clinics that give free services receive government funding. This is a circular argument.
There are not free clinics where I live that provide gynecological services.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: neo96
PP is NOT necessary.
PP offers people NOTHING they can't get elsewhere.
Well they can't 'just do abortions' , that wouldn't look good.
That is not what they mainly do.
Hospitals don't do that. Its the goto place for that.
But I get the need for it too.
Of course hospitals do. If you are not poor. you are going to a hospital in a good neighborhood (tell me Cedars Sinai doesn't perform abortions and I will eat my hat)
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: Arizonaguy
I was raised by one, along with a drunken brother...
back in the day when they gave out peanut butter and powdered milk instead of food stamps...
funny thing, we always had food, might have been # on a shingle but it was food and never had a glass of powdered milk in my life.
other things were sacrificed. like when it was time to take the college entrance exams, I asked my mom for the $20 so I could take them.... maybe I should have asked when she was sober or something but her answer was that I didn't need college, I just needed to marry a rich man, one that would take care of her and me.
If I had taken them and went right into college, I would have had enough scholarship money from various sources to carry me through a full four years of collage, easily. but, na, "we couldn't afford it"...
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: intrptr
most abortions can be done safely without hospitalization, so no hospital needed. but, under the right circumstances, yes, a hospital will do an abortion.
originally posted by: Throes
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Throes
I don't think anyone is saying abolish PP. Just stop the government funding and go back to it being funding by donations.
Not sure why, when other clinics that give free services receive government funding. This is a circular argument.
There are not free clinics where I live that provide gynecological services.
Defund them, too.
Besides, PP DOES take most of their cases as abortion or services leading up to abortion, they just lie about the statistics to make it look like they don't.
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: intrptr
most abortions can be done safely without hospitalization, so no hospital needed. but, under the right circumstances, yes, a hospital will do an abortion.
Like an emergency or threat to the mothers life, yah. Thats a very limited scope.
Hospitals are not abortion centers.
They are called planned parenthood today. In my day they were called abortion clinics. I lived across the street from one. The tales I could tell...
it got picketed, burned, bombed, protested. Regular circus every saturday morning (when they performed abrtions).
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Throes
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Throes
I don't think anyone is saying abolish PP. Just stop the government funding and go back to it being funding by donations.
Not sure why, when other clinics that give free services receive government funding. This is a circular argument.
There are not free clinics where I live that provide gynecological services.
Defund them, too.
Besides, PP DOES take most of their cases as abortion or services leading up to abortion, they just lie about the statistics to make it look like they don't.
No, they don't. That is a flat out lie.
Playing around with stats is one thing to prove a Conservative point, but that is a complete lie.
originally posted by: Throes
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Throes
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Throes
I don't think anyone is saying abolish PP. Just stop the government funding and go back to it being funding by donations.
Not sure why, when other clinics that give free services receive government funding. This is a circular argument.
There are not free clinics where I live that provide gynecological services.
Defund them, too.
Besides, PP DOES take most of their cases as abortion or services leading up to abortion, they just lie about the statistics to make it look like they don't.
No, they don't. That is a flat out lie.
Playing around with stats is one thing to prove a Conservative point, but that is a complete lie.
You should read up then.
'The 3% Myth' - Why are they hiding the real number?
nypost.com...
originally posted by: Arizonaguy
a reply to: dawnstar
Well I'm not going to continue with this silly discussion because we are getting way off of topic now. Simple point is that if you have money for Booze you don't need Federal funding. That was in response to an analogy. If Planned Parenthood has money for abortions they don't need Federal funding
originally posted by: Annee
My Planned Parenthood got shut down.
Closest is 3 hours, one way.
Way to go Arizona.
originally posted by: Arizonaguy
originally posted by: Annee
My Planned Parenthood got shut down.
Closest is 3 hours, one way.
Way to go Arizona.
Arizona has common sense. Why should we apologize for it?
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., is recognized as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation by the Internal Revenue Service. A copy of our IRS tax-exempt status letter is available upon request. Former Legal Names of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.
originally posted by: Arizonaguy
originally posted by: Annee
My Planned Parenthood got shut down.
Closest is 3 hours, one way.
Way to go Arizona.
Arizona has common sense. Why should we apologize for it?