It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: FalseMove
Well, then I'm glad to see you decided to share that which sickened you so much with everyone else. Maybe you should comment about it so it at least looks like you have some input on it rather than just spreading it around for no reason.
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: FalseMove
Well, then I'm glad to see you decided to share that which sickened you so much with everyone else. Maybe you should comment about it so it at least looks like you have some input on it rather than just spreading it around for no reason.
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes
Really??? So you think birthing the child to the crackhead mother who decided to put it in the microwave was a good idea???
Or the woman who gives birth in the middle of walking down the street only to then cut the cord and throw it in the trash to suffer a very short life in garbage is still a worthy life and one of compassion. Because I don't. If I was that child I'd much rather someone spare me those hours or days of helpless existence until my brutal fate and let me out of that whole thing as early as possible.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
I have been giving this a lot of thought lately, as I watch my now 2 year old daughter growing up.
I think less about her twin brother now than I did the first year after they were born, and how he struggled for 10 long days to survive after the surgery to correct his heart defect - the longest 10 days of my life. I never even got to hug him, only hold his tiny little hand and watch his little heart beating faster than I thought was possible while he was hooked into all these tubes and a hyperventilator (to try to help remove the excess CO2). They left his chest open after the surgery, so I literally was watching his heart beating.
I'm now 56 years old (yes, an old fart to have a 2 year old daughter), and I honestly never in my wildest dreams imagined being a father would feel the way it does.
I would like to try to change the nature of the abortion argument into one that seeks common ground, and where the one, single question - the only question that really matters - can be discussed rationally, without the emotional baggage that people who have been engaged in this debate for any length of time usually bring to the table. If I reach just one person, that would be more than good enough for me.
So, as for common ground, I hope everyone can agree that no one - in their right mind - would advocate that it is OK to kill a newborn child, or that such an act would be anything other than a horrible crime of murder.
Once there is agreement on this, it really should become crystal clear that the entire argument hinges on the answer to one, simple, question. It isn't a new question, we've all heard it before.
When does Life begin?
I honestly don't understand all of the rage surrounding this one little question, but in an attempt to get people who think they already know the answer to this question to give it a second thought, I would like to rephrase the question a little...
If you take a newborn child, and start stepping backwards in that child's life, one heartbeat at a time, at what point - at which heartbeat - does that small, tiny, helpless child become a blob of flesh that you can casually rip out of a woman's womb and discard like last weeks leftover ham?
No other question is of any consequence, and I think this very important point gets lost in the very heated arguments about abortion.
So when does 'life' begin? Some people believe it is the second after the baby is born and draws its first breath. I think that people who believe this ... have never witnessed an abortion.
I personally believe that the *potential* of the life is what is most important. I believe that, because in the vast majority of cases, a normal reasonably healthy woman who gets pregnant will have a normal healthy baby, the unborn baby should have the same protections under the law that the mother herself enjoys, and that the baby will enjoy the moment it is born.
But based on my rephrased question above, maybe the point in time that I can live with is when that tiny little heart starts beating. I was surprised to learn that this happens at just 18 days (less than 3 weeks) into the pregnancy, which is often before the woman even knows she is pregnant.
I'll be quiet now, and think about little John Alexander, what he might look like now, and how much he'd probably be fighting with his sister, while I'm on my way to pick her up from daycare.
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
That some people have killed a small baby isn't a valid excuse for making it legal to kill an unborn baby. Logic fail.
originally posted by: mOjOm
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
That some people have killed a small baby isn't a valid excuse for making it legal to kill an unborn baby. Logic fail.
I'm talking about the kids born with abnormalities because their parents were doing dope while pregnant. Or the parents who spend the first handful of years abusing their kid or worse. Sure it's easy for you to say they should go ahead and still have it, you don't have to take care of it. You also don't have to take the abuse the parents do to it either. You just get to sit there oblivious to it all and patting yourself on the back for your moral superiority.
You don't know what reasons someone may have for needing an abortion, nor do you have to help or do anything if they can't get one.
But that's what's so good about being Pro-Choice. You can choose what you think is right and so can they. You wouldn't agree to someone else making that choice for you so what makes you think it's ok for you to make it for someone else??? That's a double standard which makes you on the wrong side from the start.
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes
Actually I think those are definitely valid reasons just to name a few.
All you seem to care about is making sure everyone gives birth once pregnant regardless of the circumstances. Well that's easy for you to make that choice since you aren't the person who has to take on raising the kid.
I'm also not claiming any moral superiority here. I'm saying give everyone the same choice. Nothing superior about that. It's as fair as you can get.
What gives you the right and authority to make decisions for other people and their lives???
We both know you wouldn't accept the same treatment in return so why should they???
How many kids have you adopted BTW??
How many mothers in need are you out giving help to in raising their kids???
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes
No, you have it backwards. You're trying to force people to do what you want them to do. I'm on the side of letting them choose for themselves. You're arrogance is what is forcing someone. I'm supporting choice for each person. That is what you Pro-Lifers never seem to understand.
Again you have it backwards. I'm not responsible for someone else having a kid. Plus I support them having the choice of whether or not to actually have it. You are forcing them to have it whether they want it or not. Therefore why don't you pitch in and help them when they do. You're the one making them have it, not me. This is why your argument fails. Because you are the one forcing one option on everyone, not me. I support choice and them taking responsibility for their own life.
Face it, you and I will never agree on this. But the fact is that it is YOU who is forcing people to do what you want them to do. Not me. I support them choosing for themselves what they want to do. I'm not making them do anything at all. I support choices because choices is what I would also want. I don't want to be forced in to doing what someone else chooses for me. So I treat others how I want to be treated. YOU are the one dictating what others have to do even if they don't want to. YOU are the authoritarian. YOU are the Dictator. Not me.
So if you want to control others lives and force them to live how you want them to live then that means you own them and control them. So if that's what you want then you should also take responsibility for them. Otherwise let them choose for themselves. It's that simple.
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes
At 5.5 weeks you're not even a fetus yet let alone a baby or child.
No, I'm not changing my position of allowing someone a choice. Because it doesn't involve me so I'm not making choices for someone else just like I don't want them making choices for me.
You want to dictate peoples lives for them, fine. Then don't complain when someone dictates how you must live your life. Because that is what you support.